Contract Lawyers: Top Legal Fee Issues

/in , /by

Legal fees usually constitute a top concern for potential clients who wish to retain a St. Paul contract attorney.  In this essay, I would like to point out the top three legal fee issues that are usually associated with retaining a contract lawyer in St. Paul, Minnesota.

1. Payment Structure

There are three main models of payment that St. Paul contract lawyers use: hourly fee, contingency fee, and flat fee. The most common payment structure is hourly fee. This arrangement occurs where a contract attorney is paid based on how much time he spends on a case. If you’re paying your St. Paul contract lawyer by the hour, the agreement should set out the hourly rates of the business attorney and anyone else in this attorney’s office who might work on the case.

The contingency fee is relatively rare in a contract litigation setting, and virtually non-existent in the contract drafting and negotiations. This payment structure is characterized by payment to a contract lawyer of a mutually-agreed percentage of recovery (or contract amount) at the end of a case.

In a flat-fee arrangement, you pay an agreed-upon amount of money for a project Flat-fee payment is often used by St. Paul contract lawyers only in certain contract drafting situations. Usually, these situations are characterized by predominance of one party over another (for example, in employment context) or there has been an established consensus among parties (for example, in partnership agreement context). Flat fee, however, is less used where contract negotiation is required, and this payment structure is almost non-existent in contract litigation context (unless, a very large retainer is involved). Generally, flat fees are disliked by St. Paul contract attorneys due to its inflexibility. On the other hands, I have seen how a combination of a flat fee payment structure with hourly fees appeals to many clients while it reduces the inflexibility inherent in a simple flat-fee context.

Finally, as I just hinted above, it is possible to merge various payment structures to create a fee arrangement most agreeable to the parties.

2. Timing of Payment

Where hourly-fee arrangement is used, St. Paul contract lawyers usually bill their clients on a monthly basis. In a flat-fee arrangement, a contract attorney would prefer to receive at least half of the payment before he begins to work on a project. In any case, a retainer is usually required by St. Paul contract attorneys.

3. Retainer Fee

Most contract lawyers in St. Paul require their client to pay a retainer. Retainer can mean two different fee arrangements. First, retainer may be the amount of money a client pays to guarantee a contract lawyer’s commitment to the case. Under this arrangement, the retainer is not a form of an advance payment for future work, but a non-refundable deposit to secure the lawyer’s availability. Second, a retainer is simply the amount of money a St. Paul contract attorney asks his client to pay in advance. In this scenario, the lawyer usually deposits the retainer in a client trust account and withdraws money from it for the work completed according to the fee agreement. The fee agreement should specify the amount of the retainer and when the lawyer can withdraw money form the client trust account (usually, on a monthly basis).

Conclusion

Obviously, the three issues discussed above do not cover all of the issues associated with legal fees when you are hiring St. Paul contract lawyers. These three issues, however, are likely to provide the necessary background for you to understand the basics of the legal fee arrangements with your St. Paul contract attorney.

One of the key areas of our practice at Sherayzen Law Office is contract law. We are highly experienced in the matters of contract drafting, negotiation, and litigation. We also regularly offer our contract review and consultation services to our clients throughout Minnesota.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office NOW to discuss your contract with an experienced contract lawyer!

Tax Lawyers Minneapolis: Preparing for Initial Consultation II (for Individuals)

/in , /by

In previous article, I discussed the first part of preparation for an initial consultation with Minneapolis tax lawyers; the first part was mainly concerned with what type of information you should bring to your Minneapolis tax attorney. In this essay, I shift the focus toward the second part of the preparation which is about what type of questions you need to ask your tax lawyer.

Usually, the questions that you want your tax attorney to answer should, at the very least, cover the following four areas:

1. Cost and Billing

One of most important areas that you need to cover is the cost of the case as well as the manner in which you will be billed. Unless this is a flat-fee case, you should not expect your attorney to give you a precise amount of money you will need to spend on your case. Usually, your tax lawyer will give you an estimate, which, in the end, may or may not correspond to the actual cost of the case. I usually provide a fairly conservative estimate and it is rare for my clients to pay above the estimate; usually, it occurs where a client fails to fully disclose the circumstances of the case or otherwise causes a significant delay in the proceedings of the case.

In terms of the manner of billing, you are likely to billed per hour in most tax litigation and voluntary disclosure matters. Regular tax returns, especially for returning clients whose circumstances have not changed in any significant way, are usually subject to a flat fee.

2. Time

The next area you should question your Minneapolis tax attorney about is how long the case will need to be conducted. The estimates here are likely to vary significantly. While it is fairly easy to predict when a tax return will be finished, it is much harder to estimate an amount of time a voluntary disclosure process may take (especially if more issues come up during the disclosure process).

3. Participation

Ask your Minneapolis tax lawyer about who will handle your case – i.e. whether the attorney will handle it personally or turn it over to his associates. When you are dealing with a large law firm, you run the risk that the attorney with whom you are having the initial consultation will not be the one handling your case, especially if you are a small business or an individual. Due to common division of labor in large law firms, it is very likely that the case will be turned over to inexperienced associates whose work will be only reviewed by the attorney who conducted the initial consultation.

If, however, you are hiring a small firm or a solo practitioner, you are very likely to avoid this problem and your case will be handled from the beginning through the end by your experienced tax lawyer who is probably an owner of the law firm and personally responsible for the case.

4. Percentage of Practice

Ask your Minneapolis tax lawyer about how much time per month, on the average, he devotes to his tax practice. At the very minimum, your tax attorney should devote about 25% of his practice to tax law. If, however, the attorney has specialized associates (for example, someone who is a lawyer and a CPA), then he can have a lower percentage devoted to tax law because he may work closely with his experienced and specialized associate.

Conclusion

While these four questions do not represent a complete list of questions you should ask your tax attorney, they are likely to provide that minimum background necessary for the review of a retainer agreement with your Minneapolis tax lawyer.

Sherayzen Law Office can help you with your tax issues, whether you want to check your tax return, negotiate with the IRS, or engage in complex tax planning.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office NOW to discuss your tax case with an experienced Minneapolis tax attorney!