Business Lawyer: Essential Characteristics of Closely Held Corporations

/in , /by

Most small business lawyers in St. Paul deal with closely held corporations. In order to understand this form of business entity, it is useful to explore the essential characteristics shared by the predominant majority of closely held corporations. The purpose of this article is to provide a general overview of the four most common characteristics of a closely held corporation.

1. No Public Ownership of Stock

This characteristic is present in almost every closely held corporation. Lack of “public ownership of stock” usually means that the stock of a closely held corporation has never been sold in a public offering (as this term is used in connection with Securities and Exchange Act of 1933 and similar state statutes). It may also mean that the stock of a closely held corporation is not listed on any stock exchanges or otherwise regularly traded. The corollary of this characteristic is that it is often very difficult to determine the value of a closely held corporation’s stock.

2. Closely Controlled by Few Shareholders

It is very common for a closely held corporation to be controlled by one individual, a single family, or a small group of shareholders. This characteristic also holds true even where a large percentage (yet less than controlling share) of a corporation’s stock is owned by a public shareholder, while the controlling number of shares is in the hands of an individual or a private group of shareholders. In such atypical cases, closely held corporations are often being singled out for special tax treatment. The converse of this reality is that the present of a public shareholder may reduce substantially many of the tax problems (for example, in the are of the tax on accumulated earnings).

3. Management by Owners

In a closely held corporation, the shareholders and the operating executives are often the same individuals. Moreover, in many cases, the stock held by these individuals is not merely an investment, but rather the principal source of income.

4. Restricted Ownership

Closely held corporations are also often “closed” corporations. This means it is often difficult for an outsider to obtain stock in a closely held corporation, and it is difficult for a current shareholder to sell stock except to other shareholders or the corporation itself. Very often, this situation arises intentionally as part of the legal structure of the corporation as defined by the Shareholder agreements.

Conclusion

As one see, usually a closely held corporation is generally a corporation that is owned, controlled and managed by a few private shareholders; the stock of such corporation is neither traded frequently nor listed on any of stock exchanges. These are obviously only the most common characteristics. There plenty of variations which may also be classified as “closely held corporations”, but even these variations usually share most of these common characteristics.

Reduce Your Self Employment Tax with a New Health Insurance Deduction

/in , , /by

Due to the enactment of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, self-employed taxpayers who pay their own health insurance costs can now reduce their net earnings from self-employment by these costs. Previously, the self-employed health insurance deduction was allowed only for income tax purposes. For tax year 2010, however, self-employed taxpayers can also reduce their net earnings from self employment subject to self-employment taxes on Schedule SE by the amount of self-employed health insurance deduction claimed on line 29 on Form 1040.

Taxpayers can claim the self-employed health insurance deduction if the insurance plan is established under their business and if any of the following are true:

a) They were self-employed and had a net profit for the year,
b) They used one of the optional methods to figure net earnings from self-employment on Schedule SE, or
c) They received wages from an S corporation in which the taxpayer was a more-than-2-percent shareholder.

Contact Mr. Sherayzen at Sherayzen Law Office Minneapolis tax lawyer who can help you properly plan your tax strategy to take advantage of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contact Us Now!

Contract Lawyers: Top Legal Fee Issues

/in , /by

Legal fees usually constitute a top concern for potential clients who wish to retain a St. Paul contract attorney.  In this essay, I would like to point out the top three legal fee issues that are usually associated with retaining a contract lawyer in St. Paul, Minnesota.

1. Payment Structure

There are three main models of payment that St. Paul contract lawyers use: hourly fee, contingency fee, and flat fee. The most common payment structure is hourly fee. This arrangement occurs where a contract attorney is paid based on how much time he spends on a case. If you’re paying your St. Paul contract lawyer by the hour, the agreement should set out the hourly rates of the business attorney and anyone else in this attorney’s office who might work on the case.

The contingency fee is relatively rare in a contract litigation setting, and virtually non-existent in the contract drafting and negotiations. This payment structure is characterized by payment to a contract lawyer of a mutually-agreed percentage of recovery (or contract amount) at the end of a case.

In a flat-fee arrangement, you pay an agreed-upon amount of money for a project Flat-fee payment is often used by St. Paul contract lawyers only in certain contract drafting situations. Usually, these situations are characterized by predominance of one party over another (for example, in employment context) or there has been an established consensus among parties (for example, in partnership agreement context). Flat fee, however, is less used where contract negotiation is required, and this payment structure is almost non-existent in contract litigation context (unless, a very large retainer is involved). Generally, flat fees are disliked by St. Paul contract attorneys due to its inflexibility. On the other hands, I have seen how a combination of a flat fee payment structure with hourly fees appeals to many clients while it reduces the inflexibility inherent in a simple flat-fee context.

Finally, as I just hinted above, it is possible to merge various payment structures to create a fee arrangement most agreeable to the parties.

2. Timing of Payment

Where hourly-fee arrangement is used, St. Paul contract lawyers usually bill their clients on a monthly basis. In a flat-fee arrangement, a contract attorney would prefer to receive at least half of the payment before he begins to work on a project. In any case, a retainer is usually required by St. Paul contract attorneys.

3. Retainer Fee

Most contract lawyers in St. Paul require their client to pay a retainer. Retainer can mean two different fee arrangements. First, retainer may be the amount of money a client pays to guarantee a contract lawyer’s commitment to the case. Under this arrangement, the retainer is not a form of an advance payment for future work, but a non-refundable deposit to secure the lawyer’s availability. Second, a retainer is simply the amount of money a St. Paul contract attorney asks his client to pay in advance. In this scenario, the lawyer usually deposits the retainer in a client trust account and withdraws money from it for the work completed according to the fee agreement. The fee agreement should specify the amount of the retainer and when the lawyer can withdraw money form the client trust account (usually, on a monthly basis).

Conclusion

Obviously, the three issues discussed above do not cover all of the issues associated with legal fees when you are hiring St. Paul contract lawyers. These three issues, however, are likely to provide the necessary background for you to understand the basics of the legal fee arrangements with your St. Paul contract attorney.

One of the key areas of our practice at Sherayzen Law Office is contract law. We are highly experienced in the matters of contract drafting, negotiation, and litigation. We also regularly offer our contract review and consultation services to our clients throughout Minnesota.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office NOW to discuss your contract with an experienced contract lawyer!

Minnesota LLC Formation V: Member Control Agreement

/in , /by

Member Control Agreement can be the most important governance document in the process of the LLC Formation because it may provide the LLC members with maximum governance flexibility, including overruling some provisions of the Minnesota Limited Liability Company Act.

In fact, a Member Control Agreement may completely reorganize the governance structure of an LLC away form the Act’s default corporate model.  Instead, the members of the LLC may choose to adopt a partnership-like governance model which may greatly facilitate the conduct of business, especially where there are few LLC members.

One of the least-known aspects of a Member Control Agreement is that a person, who is neither a member nor a party to a contribution agreement, may nevertheless be a party to a Member Control Agreement.  This provision may provide a new level of flexibility by incorporating in the Agreement persons who may have financial rights under the Agreement even though they do not possess the usual membership rights (such as voting).

Typically, a Member Control Agreement can regulate a wide range of ownership and management issues, including: transfer of membership interest; contributions of capital, property or services during and after the formation of an LLC, management and governance structure of an LLC, tax elections, distributions of cash and other assets, allocation of profit and loss, establishment and maintenance of bank accounts, books and records; access to books and records, valuation of membership interests, employment of members, dissolution and winding up of the LLC, et cetera. A Member Control Agreement may even re-determine the rights of dissenting members as provided in Minn. Stat. §322B.383 and Minn. Stat. §322B.386. Even this non-exclusive list of issues already emphasizes the significance of the Member Control Agreement to the operation of the LLC.

Precisely due to this significance, special requirements are imposed by the Act on the execution of a Member Control Agreement. In order to be valid, a Member Control Agreement must scrupulously follow the requirements of Minn. Stat. §322B.37.  Even then, the Agreement can only be enforced “by persons who are parties to it and is binding upon and enforceable against only those persons and other persons having knowledge of the existence of the member control agreement.” Minn. Stat. §322B.37, Subd. 3(a). Finally, special recordkeeping requirements are demanded by the Act, including filing of the Member Control Agreement with the required records of an LLC.  The records themselves must note that the members’ interests are governed by a Member Control Agreement.

Thus, a Member Control Agreement may provide a great business opportunity by allowing maximum flexibility in the governance structure of an LLC.  This opportunity, however, must be handled with care and knowledge of a legal professional; otherwise, it may turn into a litigation nightmare.  Therefore, you should retain a Minnesota business lawyer to advise you and ultimately draft the Agreement.

Sherayzen Law Office is an experienced business law firm with one of its primary concentrations in advising and creating business governance documents.  We can advise you with respect to whether you need a Member Control Agreement, help you negotiate the necessary provision, draft the Agreement, make sure it is properly executed, and establish the right recordkeeping procedures to comply with Minn. Stat. §322B.37.

Business Lawyers Minneapolis: Legal Fee Issues

/in , /by

When you are about to hire a business lawyer in Minneapolis, you need to discuss the following top three legal fee issues:

1. Payment Structure

There are three main models of payment that lawyers use: hourly fee, contingency fee, and flat fee. The hourly fee is the most common form of business lawyer compensation in Minneapolis because it is fairly simple and, yet, flexible – the business attorney is paid only based on the time he spends on the case. If you are paying your business lawyer by the hour, the agreement should set out the hourly rates of the business attorney and anyone else in this attorney’s office who might work on the case.

A contingency fee, where a Minneapolis business attorney takes a percentage of the amount the client wins at the end of the case, is very rarely used by business attorneys in Minneapolis. In the unlikely case that this latter type of fee arrangement is used, the most important issue to understand is whether the business lawyer deducts the costs and expenses from the amount won before or after you pay the lawyer’s percentage. Obviously, you will pay more in attorney fees if your business lawyer deducts the litigation costs based on the latter scenario (i.e. after you pay the lawyer’s fee).

Finally, in a flat fee arrangement, you pay an agreed-upon amount of money per job/case. For example, you pay $5,000 to your business attorney to organize your corporation with all of the corresponding corporate documents. While a flat fee arrangement is possible in a small project, it is generally disliked by business lawyers in Minneapolis because it often lacks the necessary flexibility to account for the client’s individual legal situation. Usually, some sort of an additional payment arrangement is built into such fee agreements to make sure that the balance between the client’s legal needs and the business attorney’s fees is maintained.

Remember,out-of-pocket expenses (e.g. long-distance calls, mailing costs, photocopying fees, lodging, etc.) and litigation costs (such as court filing fees) are usually billed to you in addition to your business lawyer’s fees.

2. Retainer

Most business lawyers in Minneapolis require their client to pay a retainer. Retainer can mean two different fee arrangements. First, retainer may be the amount of money a client pays to guarantee the lawyer’s commitment to the case. Under this arrangement, the retainer is not a form of an advance payment for future work, but a non-refundable deposit to secure the lawyer’s availability. Second, a retainer is simply the amount of money a business attorney asks his client to pay in advance. In this scenario, the lawyer usually deposits the retainer in a client trust account and withdraws money from it for the work completed according to the fee agreement. The fee agreement should specify the amount of the retainer and when the lawyer can withdraw money form the client trust account (usually, on a monthly basis).

3. Timing of Billing

Usually, business attorneys in Minneapolis bill their clients on a monthly basis. Sometimes, however, when the project is not large, the fee agreement will specify that you will be billed upon completion of the case. In a flat-fee scenario, it is likely that the client will be obligated to pay either a half or even the whole amount immediately as a retainer. It is wise for a client to insist in paying some part of the fee upon completion of the case to retain a degree of control over the case completion.

Conclusion

Generally, before you sign the fee agreement, business lawyers in Minneapolis will discuss with you many more topics than what is covered in this article. The three issues explained here, however, are crucial to your understanding of how the business relationship with your Minneapolis business attorney will work. Before you sign the fee agreement with your business lawyer in Minneapolis, you should ask at least these three questions and make sure that the answers are complete and to your satisfaction.