Form 114(a): Authorization to Efile FBARs

/in , /by

In response to numerous requests made by the international tax attorneys and individual FBAR filers of the Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBARs) jointly with spouses, or wish to submit them via third-party preparers, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) introduced FinCEN Form 114(a), Record of Authorization to Electronically File FBARs. A copy of this form would be maintained by the filer and the account owner, but not submitted to FinCEN. The form would be made available upon request by FinCEN or the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

New Version of the FBAR

Note, that Form 114(a) came out just ahead of the new version of the FBAR which was tested in October of 2013.

FBARs are used by U.S. taxpayers to disclose foreign financial accounts and they were due on June 30; the filing deadlines now coincide with tax return deadlines (April and October) for each preceding calendar year. There is an automatic extension to October if you cannot file your FBAR by April 15th. Failure to file FBARs on time can lead to severe penalties and even criminal prosecution.

Modified Voluntary Disclosure Based on Reasonable Cause

It is important to emphasize that Form 114(a) should be provided to your international tax attorney if he is filing FBARs on your behalf. This is irrespective of whether you are filing your FBARs a few days late or whether your international tax attorney is e-filing the FBARs as part of your modified voluntary disclosure based on reasonable cause. Note that, starting October 1, 2013, the OVDP/OVDI participants are also required to e-file the FBARs ; special reference to the OVDP/OVDI program should also be submitted – contact Sherayzen Law Office for details.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help with E-filing FBARs for Undisclosed Accounts

If you have foreign bank accounts and need help with e-filing late FBARs for undisclosed accounts, contact Sherayzen Law Office for legal and tax help. Our law firm consists of highly experienced international tax professionals who will thoroughly review your case, identify available options and prepare all of the legal documents and tax forms necessary for your voluntary disclosure process.

New 2013 FBAR form: E-filing Explanation for Late FBARs

/in , /by

On October 1, 2013, in response to various requests from FBAR tax lawyers and accountants, FinCEN updated the online FBAR filing form. There are various new technical additions and a much friendlier user interface, but the inclusion of the explanation for the delay in FBAR filing is definitely the key new feature for the FBAR tax lawyers who are thinking about recommending the reasonable cause disclosure (a/k/a Modified Voluntary Disclosure) to their clients.

The late FBAR explanation has two particularly interesting characteristics.

Analysis of the Late Filing Explanation Choices

First, a taxpayer who files his FBAR late can choose among the following ten answers to explain the reason for filing the FBAR late:

A. Forgot to file
B. Did not know that I had to file
C. Thought account balance was below reporting threshold
D. Did not know that my account qualified as foreign
E. Account statement not received in time
F. Account statement lost (replacement requested)
G. Late receiving missing required account information
H. Unable to obtain joint spouse signature in time
I. Unable to access BSA E-Filing System
Z. Other

These choices are somewhat surprising for FBAR tax lawyers because some of these choices would not normally constitute a reasonable cause, others are repetitive and some may actually get the taxpayer (especially a taxpayer who is not represented by an FBAR tax lawyer).

The most dangerous answer is “A” – forgetting the FBAR means that the taxpayer admits to the knowledge of the existence of the FBAR requirement and non-willfully but negligently fails to comply with the FBAR requirement. Potentially, the IRS can use this answer to impose a $10,000 penalty per violation.

Choice “B” is a good but insufficient choice. Lack of knowledge of the FBAR may help establish non-willfulness, but it is not sufficient in itself for a reasonable cause. FBAR tax lawyers usually start with non-willfulness, but this is not where they end.

Choices “C” and, to a lesser extent, “F” may be dangerous because it is unclear where the confusion (in case of “C”) comes from and why the statements (in the case of “F”) were lost. The taxpayer could be opening the door to potential charge that he is not compliant with the FBAR recordkeeping requirements.

Outside of U.S. territories, I am not certain who would be using answer “D”. In any case, by itself, it does not appear to be sufficient to avoid the imposition of an FBAR penalty.

Choices “E” and “G” are pretty much the same and would be useful in presenting the argument for the reasonable cause, but this task can hardly accomplished without presenting a comprehensive context in which these events occurred. The same problem applies to “H” and “I”.

Choice “Z” – Other Explanation

The second and most important feature of the new FBAR is that it provides the space for writing an explanation for why the FBARs are filed late – this is the last choice “Z”.

There is, however, a very important limitation with respect to choice “Z”; there are only a maximum of 750 characters allowed. In other words, FinCEN and the IRS only gave taxpayers a few tweets to present a complex argument for non-willfulness and reasonable cause. Most FBAR tax lawyers will agree that 750 characters is a laughable amount of space for a reasonable cause explanation.

I believe that this feature will continue to be a great obstacle to submitting reasonable cause explanations purely electronically. More likely, the electronic explanation will need to reference the reasonable cause statement on paper.

Possibility of PDF File Upload in the Future

It seems that the IRS also understands that there is a big problem with choice Z. I fully expect the IRS to finish and implement a new feature (probably in the next version of the FBAR) that would allow FBAR tax lawyers to upload their reasonable cause statements as a pdf file (in a same manner as it is currently done in many court systems in the United States).

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Legal Help With Late FBARs

If you have undisclosed foreign accounts and you are facing a situation where your FBARs will be filed late, contact Sherayzen Law Office for professional legal help with your late FBARs. Our experienced FBAR tax firm will thoroughly analyze your case, present the available choices, and properly conduct your voluntary disclosure, including the preparation and filing of late FBARs and other necessary legal documents and tax forms.

Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Attorney: Introduction to Program for Swiss Banks

/in , /by

Since the early 2000s, the IRS has engaged in a multi-layered effort to enforce U.S. tax laws overseas, in particular (at least from the perspective of an offshore voluntary disclosure attorney) curb tax evasion in Switzerland with the emphasis on undisclosed Swiss financial accounts (mainly FBAR compliance). In 2008, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) scored a major victory in the now-famous UBS case.

Since that case, DOJ has pursued a large number of criminal investigations against the U.S. accountholders, Swiss tax and financial advisors and, actually, Swiss banks. There has also been a tremendous surge in IRS civil audits and John Doe summons. Even the Whistleblower Office became engaged in the international tax compliance efforts. A number of new laws and treaties, stemming from FATCA, have been utilized by the U.S. government in its worldwide efforts to increase U.S. tax compliance internationally.

As the DOJ increased its pressure on the U.S. taxpayers who have undisclosed foreign accounts, the IRS created a number of voluntary disclosure programs, 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) being the latest example. As of September of 2013, it is estimated that about 40,000 U.S. taxpayers have voluntary participated in this program OVDP is now closed.

The Program – Voluntary Disclosure Program for Swiss Banks

On August 29, 2013, the DOJ announced a new, unprecedented initiative – The Program for Non-Prosecution Agreements or Non-Target Letters for Swiss Banks (Program) – which is intended to allow Swiss banks to bring themselves into compliance with DOJ requirements and avoid any US enforcement action in exchanged for detailed disclosures and, in some cases, the payment of monetary penalties.

In essence, this is a voluntary disclosure program. Unlike the OVDP, however, this is “OVDP” for foreign banks in a foreign country! This is a truly unique reach that the DOJ and IRS have achieved in a country which has been celebrated for centuries for its bank secrecy laws.

Outlines of Required Disclosure

Under the Program, the Swiss banks are required to turn over a vast amount of extensive and detailed information regarding its account holders, including providing the following information: description of how the banks structured, operated and supervised their cross-border activities; list of names and functions of all individuals who participated in any of this activity; description of how a bank marketed its services to U.S. persons and serviced their accounts; list the value of accounts greater than $50,000 during three separate periods; on an account by account basis, the highest value during the period beginning August 1, 2008; the number of persons affiliated with the account and their functions; whether the account was held in a structure (a foreign corporation, foundation, etc.); whether it held U.S. securities; the name and role of any outside advisor affiliated with the account; information about transfers of funds into or out of the account; and other detailed information (note: these are some of the disclosure requirements, but there are many more – contact offshore voluntary disclosure attorney Eugene Sherayzen at Sherayzen Law Office for more information).

In essence, with this information, the IRS and DOJ can freely pursue civil and criminal investigations of U.S. persons who have had undisclosed bank accounts since 2008 (and possibly earlier).

Consequences for Swiss Banks

The banks who participate in the Program can use the it to effectively close-out any potential U.S. compliance issues and prevent future criminal prosecution of the banks. The hope is that it will enable Swiss banks to put this issue behind them and enable them to develop a more attractive investment environment in the future.

Consequences for U.S. Accountholders

As any offshore voluntary disclosure attorney will tell you, the consequences for the U.S. accountholders with undisclosed accounts in Switzerland are infinitely more dire. Armed with such detailed information, the IRS should have no problems auditing and, ultimately, prosecuting U.S. taxpayers who are not compliant with U.S. tax laws.

Furthermore, those individuals who have engaged in quiet disclosure at any point since 2008 are under severe risk of exposure and potential prosecution. For example, if a U.S. taxpayer had an undisclosed account since 2004 and engaged in quiet disclosure in 2012, he may now potentially face an IRS audit for all years going back to 2007 (and potentially further).

Additionally, there is a great uncertainly for U.S. taxpayers with Swiss accounts who wish to enter the OVDP, because their accounts may have already been disclosed independently by Swiss banks to the IRS. In this case, the OVDP participation may be precluded.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Legal Help with Undisclosed Swiss Accounts

If you have undisclosed Swiss accounts at any point since 2005, contact Sherayzen Law Office for professional help. Our international tax law firm is highly experienced in the voluntary disclosures of foreign financial accounts and other offshore assets. We will thoroughly analyze your case, determine the available voluntary disclosure options for your offshore assets, and meticulously implement the chosen plan of action (including preparation of all legal documents and tax forms).

FBAR Penalties vs Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program Penalties

/in , /by

There is a great confusion among international tax attorneys and Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) applicants with respect to the OVDP Offshore Penalty and how it differs from the FBAR penalties. I already described in another article the OVDP penalties. In this article, I would like to compare and contrast some of the major features of the OVDP Offshore Penalty with the FBAR penalties.

FBAR Penalties

FBAR is one of the most unforgiving forms on the planet. The penalties associated with delinquent FBARs can be terrifying.

At the apex of the penalty structure are the criminal penalties that are imposed in association with a willful violation of the FBAR filing requirements under 31 U.S.C. section 5322(a), 31 U.S.C. section 5322(b), or 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. The criminal penalties may be up to 10 years in jail and $500,000 in fines.

Willful (i.e. where a person willfully fails to report an account or account identifying information) civil penalties equal to the greater of $100,000 or 50 percent of the balance in the account at the time of the violation. See 31 U.S.C. section 5321(a)(5). Note, that a penalty in this case applies to each violation which is defined as each undisclosed account per year.

Even where the violation is non-willful, a person may be subject to a civil penalty of $10,000 per violation. Again, note that this is a penalty per violation – i.e. per each unreported account per each year.

For the purposes of this article, it is also important to note that the penalties apply only to “foreign financial accounts”. This term is defined broadly to include various types of accounts which are not normally associated with the word “account” (for example: a precious metals storage or a life insurance policy with a cash-surrender value). Nevertheless, the FBAR penalty would not apply to real estate or a business interest; it would apply only to foreign financial accounts – i.e. the balances on the foreign financial accounts and the number of these accounts constitute the primary penalty base for the calculation of the FBAR penalties.

OVDP Offshore Penalties

In contrast to traditional FBAR penalties, OVDP Offshore Penalty may mean a completely different penalty range and penalty base.

Offshore Penalty Range

Unlike the FBAR penalties, OVDP Offshore Penalty is a limited penalty – i.e. there is a certain penalty that you have to pay by virtue of participating into the program. It is very important to understand that most individual circumstances, willfulness, non-willfulness and reasonable case have virtually no impact on the calculation of the Offshore Penalty.

There are three tiers of the OVDP Offshore Penalty. First, there is a 5% penalty tier. There are various possibilities how one would be entitled to such a favorable treatment; a detailed discussion of the 5% penalty possibilities is described elsewhere on sherayzenlaw.com.

Second, there is a 12.5% penalty tier. An OVDP applicant would be entitled to this penalty tier only if, during each of the years covered by the OVDP, the taxpayer’s penalty base (see below for detailed explanation of what “penalty base” means) is less than $75,000.

Finally, if neither 5% nor 12.5% penalty tiers apply, the default penalty of 27.5% of the penalty base will apply.

Penalty Base

As important as the penalty range, it pales in comparison to the determination of the OVDP Offshore Penalty base, because these calculations can be vastly different from the FBAR penalties.

First, the Offshore Penalty is imposed only once on the highest amount of the penalty base during the Voluntary Disclosure period (i.e. years covered by the OVDP which sometimes can be quite tricky to figure out).

Second, the base for the Offshore Penalty includes a wide variety of assets including foreign bank accounts, the fair market value of assets in undisclosed offshore entities, and the fair market value of any foreign assets that were either acquired with improperly untaxed funds or produced improperly untaxed income. The general rule is that the offshore penalty is intended to apply to all of the taxpayer’s offshore holdings that are related in any way to tax non-compliance, regardless of the form of the taxpayer’s ownership or the character of the asset.

This means that the Offshore Penalty may include such assets as business ownership interests, stocks, artwork, automobiles, patents, trademarks, and (very important) real estate. Even ownership of U.S. businesses acquired with tainted funds may be open to the Offshore Penalty.

In other words, the penalty base of the OVDP Offshore Penalty may include a much greater variety of assets in addition to the assets already covered by the FBAR.

Penalty Differences Between FBARs and OVDP Should Influence Your Voluntary Disclosure Options

Given the tremendous differences in the range of penalties and the calculation of the penalty base, it is highly important (and I cannot stress this point enough) to properly analyze the potential tax liabilities under both methods before making the decision on whether to enter the OVDP or pursue a reasonable cause (so-called “noisy” or “modified”) voluntary disclosure. It is highly important that the client understands the differences in the calculations and the potential risks of pursuing either option.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help With the Disclosure of Your Foreign Financial Accounts

If you have undisclosed foreign financial accounts or other offshore assets, contact Sherayzen Law Office for legal help. Our experienced international tax law firm will thoroughly analyze your case, calculate your potential tax liabilities, present you with a range of options, and implement your voluntary disclosure plan (including preparation of all tax forms and legal documents).

Foreign Tax Credit for Individuals: Who Can Take It?

/in , /by

If you paid or accrued foreign taxes to a foreign country on foreign source income and are subject to U.S. tax on the same income, you may be able to take these qualified foreign taxes as a tax credit to offset (in part or in full) your U.S. tax liability. An important questions arises for foreign tax credit attorneys: who is eligible to claim a foreign tax credit on his individual U.S. tax returns.

The first and most obvious category consists of U.S. citizens. If you are a U.S. citizen, you would usually be entitled to take a credit for foreign taxes that you paid or accrued. Part of the reason for this eligibility is the fact that, as a U.S. citizen, you are taxed by the U.S. government on your worldwide income irrespective of where you live.

Resident aliens constitute the second eligible category to claim foreign tax credit. Same reasoning applies as to U.S. citizens.

In most cases, nonresident aliens would not be able to take a foreign tax credit. However, there are important exceptions. The two major exceptions are: Puerto Rico residency or ECI (Effectively Connected Income).

The latter exception requires a bit more explanation. If you are a non-resident alien who pays or accrues tax to a foreign country or a U.S. possession on income from foreign sources that is effectively connected (here where the “ECI” term comes into play) with a trade or business in the United States, then you may be able to claim foreign tax credit on your individual U.S. tax return. ECI is a term of art and whether your foreign income is effectively connected with a trade or business in the United States is a complex legal question that should be reviewed by an international tax attorney.

Note that, where a non-resident alien pays foreign taxes on income from U.S. sources only because he is a citizen or resident of that foreign country, then this tax cannot be used in figuring the amount of the foreign tax credit.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help with Your Foreign Tax Credit

Claiming a foreign tax credit can be a very complex tax question and you need the right professionals to help you. Contact Sherayzen Law Office for experienced professional help with your foreign tax credit issues.