Fifth Protocol to the Canada-US Income Tax Treaty

/in , /by

The Fifth Protocol to the Canada-US Income Tax Convention (also known as the Canada-US Income Tax Treaty) was signed in 2007 and ratified by the U.S. Senate the following year, making significant changes to the then existing treaty.

This article will briefly explain some of the major Fifth Protocol (“Protocol”) changes to the US-Canada Income Tax Treaty (“Treaty”). It is not intended to constitute tax or legal advice, and it does not cover every change to the Treaty.

Cross-border taxation can involve many complex tax and legal issues, so you are advised to seek an experienced attorney in these matters. Sherayzen Law Office, PLLC can assist you in all of your tax and legal needs, and help you avoid making costly mistakes.

Treaty Article XI- Withholdings on Interest

One substantial change to the Canada-US Tax treaty was the elimination of withholding tax on cross-border interest payments to unrelated parties. According to the Protocol, “[I]nterest means income from debt-claims of every kind, whether or not secured by mortgage, and whether or not carrying a right to participate in the debtor’s profits, and in particular, income from government securities and income from bonds or debentures, including premiums or prizes attaching to such securities, bonds or debentures, as well as income assimilated to income from money lent by the taxation laws of the Contracting State in which the income arises.” It should be noted however that “interest” under this definition does not include dividends.

Taxpayer Migration – Protection Against Double Taxation

Under the previous rule, the US and Canada were allowed to tax residents on all of their capital gains without any provisions made for the fact that a country may have leveled a pre-departure tax on emigrants. The Protocol addressed this concern by allowing such individuals to “[E]lect to be treated for the purposes of taxation in the other Contracting State, in the year that includes that time and all subsequent years, as if the individual had, immediately before that time, sold and repurchased the property for an amount equal to its fair market value at that time.” (See Article 8 of the Protocol).

Mandatory Arbitration

For US and Canadian residents subject to certain unresolved double-taxation issues between US and Canadian revenue authorities within a specified time period, the Protocol changed the existing Treaty to allow taxpayers to require that the revenue authorities of the two countries enter a binding arbitration. While the arbitration procedure is mandatory for revenue authorities once compelled by a taxpayer, the decision of whether to do so is entirely optional for the taxpayer. A taxpayer must have filed a tax return with at least one of the two countries to utilize the election.

“Limited Liability Companies” (LLCs) and Other Hybrid Entities

LLCs and certain other hybrid entities face different tax treatment in the US and Canada. In general, in the US, such entities are treated as pass-through vehicles, whereas in Canada, they are treated as corporations (please see Department of Finance Canada for more information about Canadian taxation). Prior to the Protocol, a reduced withholding tax rate was not available to such entities because an entity must be taxable as a “resident” in at least one of the two countries in order to benefit from the Treaty. According to the Department of Finance Canada, under the Protocol changes, “Income that the residents of one country earn through a hybrid entity will in certain cases be treated by the other country (the source country) as having been earned by a resident of the residence country. On the other hand, a corollary rule provides that if a hybrid entity’s income is not taxed directly in the hands of its investors, it will be treated as not having been earned by a resident.”

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help with US-Canada Cross-border Tax Issues

If you have any questions regarding US-Canada tax treaties or you have not filed your Forms 8891, contact the experienced tax firm of Sherayzen Law Office for help.

Subpart F Active Financing Income Exceptions and Look-Through Rule Extended

/in , /by

The recent American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 passed by Congress and signed by the president on January 2, 2013 extended the temporary exceptions for “active financing income” from subpart F foreign personal holding company income, foreign base company services income, and insurance income. The same act also extended the subpart F look-through rule of IRC Section 954(c)(6).

This article will briefly explain the active financing exception to the subpart F rules and the look-through rule of Section 954(c)(6) and detail the extensions of such provisions provided for by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. The article is not intended to convey tax or legal advice.

IRS Subpart F rules and the IRC sections covering Controlled Foreign Corporations involve many complex tax and legal issues, so it is advisable to seek an experienced attorney in these matters. Sherayzen Law Office, Ltd. can assist you in all of your tax and legal needs, and help you avoid making costly mistakes.

Active Financing Income Exception to Subpart F Rules

IRC Section 954(h) provides for a special exception from IRS subpart F rules for “[I]ncome derived in the active conduct of banking, financing, or similar businesses.” In general, a controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) will be treated as being predominately engaged in the active conduct of banking, financing, or similar businesses if more than 70% of the gross income of the CFC is derived directly from the, “[A]ctive and regular conduct of a lending or finance business from transactions with customers which are not related persons.”

The active financing exception was originally included in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997; the same act also modified Passive Foreign Investment Company (“PFIC”) rules to eliminate overlap between Subpart F and PFIC provisions as a special one-year exception (President Clinton vetoed this provision under the Line Item Veto Act, but it was reinstated after the US Supreme Court ruled that the Line Item Veto Act was unconstitutional). IRC Section 954(h)(3) was later amended by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-357) to provide for the temporary exception, and the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 subsequently extended the exception for tax years ending in 2007 and 2008. The Middle Class Tax Relief Act of 2010 further extended the active financing exception through 2011. Under the new American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, the exception was retroactively extended through the end of 2013.

Subpart F Look-Through Rule of IRC Section 954(c)(6)

IRC Section 954(c)(6)(A) (“Look-thru rule for related controlled foreign corporations “) provides that, in general, “For purposes of this subsection, dividends, interest, rents, and royalties received or accrued from a controlled foreign corporation which is a related person shall not be treated as foreign personal holding company income to the extent attributable or properly allocable (determined under rules similar to the rules of subparagraphs (C) and (D) of section 904(d)(3)) to income of the related person which is neither subpart F income nor income treated as effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States.” Treatment of other types of equivalent interest is also addressed in the section.

The Look-Through Rule was part of Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 and originally applied to tax years beginning after December 31, 2005, and before January 1, 2009. Certain parts of the original look-through rule were subsequently modified by later acts, and the rule itself was extended through the end of 2011 by the Middle Class Tax Relief Act of 2010. Under the new American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, the rule now applies to foreign corporation tax years beginning after December 31, 2005, and before January 1, 2014.

Filing and Payment Extension for Suffolk County and other Victims of Boston Marathon Explosions

/in , /by

On April 16, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service announced a three-month tax filing and payment extension to Boston area taxpayers and others affected by April 15, 2013 explosions. This relief applies to all individual taxpayers who live in Suffolk County, Mass., including the city of Boston. It also includes victims, their families, first responders, others impacted by this tragedy who live outside Suffolk County and taxpayers whose tax preparers were adversely affected.

“Our hearts go out to the people affected by this tragic event,” said IRS Acting Commissioner Steven T. Miller. “We want victims and others affected by this terrible tragedy to have the time they need to finish their individual tax returns.”

Under the relief announced today, the IRS will issue a notice giving eligible taxpayers until July 15, 2013, to file their 2012 returns and pay any taxes normally due April 15. No filing and payment penalties will be due as long as returns are filed and payments are made by July 15, 2013.

Note, however, by law, interest, currently at the annual rate of 3 percent compounded daily, will still apply to any payments made after the April deadline.

The IRS will automatically provide this extension to anyone living in Suffolk County. If you live in Suffolk County, no further action is necessary by taxpayers to obtain this relief. However, eligible taxpayers living outside Suffolk County can claim this relief by calling 1-866-562-5227 starting Tuesday, April 23, 2013, and identifying themselves to the IRS before filing a return or making a payment. Eligible taxpayers who receive penalty notices from the IRS can also call this number to have these penalties abated.

Eligible taxpayers who need more time to file their returns may receive an additional extension to Oct. 15, 2013, by filing Form 4868 by July 15, 2013.

Requirements for Timely Filing Tax Returns for U.S. Persons Living Overseas

/in , /by

Are you a U.S. person for living overseas who is required to file U.S. taxes? Then you should be especially aware of U.S. filing deadlines, and the importance of timely filing your tax return under IRC Section 7502. Filing a tax return is often stressful enough for most people living in the U.S. Filing a return while living overseas can be yet an additional burden, particularly for those who do not speak a foreign language fluently, or for those residing in remote areas where access to sufficient postal delivery may be limited. Failure to timely file your tax return can lead to penalties and interest (and further, failure to timely file a refund claim can result in the expiration of such a claim). Hence, if you are a U.S. person living overseas you should ensure that you follow the rules that are outlined in this article.

This article strives to explain the basics of IRC Section 7502 and various revenue rulings clarifying the IRS position regarding timely filing of U.S. tax returns and other documents mailed from foreign countries. It is not intended to constitute tax or legal advice.

International taxation can involve many complex tax and legal issues, so it is highly advisable to seek an experienced attorney in these matters. Sherayzen Law Office, PLLC can assist you in all of your tax and legal needs, and help you avoid making costly mistakes.

A Brief History of IRC Section 7502 and Other Rules

Under the general rule of Internal Revenue Code Section 7502:

“if any return, claim, statement, or other document required to be filed, or any payment required to be made, within a prescribed period or on or before a prescribed date under authority of any provision of the internal revenue laws is, after such period or such date, delivered by United States mail to the agency, officer, or office with which such return, claim, statement, or other document is required to be filed, or to which such payment is required to be made, the date of the United States postmark stamped on the cover in which such return, claim, statement, or other document, or payment, is mailed shall be deemed to be the date of delivery or the date of payment, as the case may be.”

In other words, generally, if a taxpayer mailed a return or the other specified items before a stated deadline, the mailing date would be treated as the filing date, even though the return or other specified documents were received after the actual deadline (this is also commonly known as the “mailbox rule”).

For U.S. taxpayers living overseas, in Rev. Rul. 80-218 the IRS further clarified, “United States federal tax returns mailed by taxpayers in foreign countries will be accepted as timely filed if they bear an official postmark dated on or before midnight of the last date prescribed for filing, including any extension of time for such filing.” Note that Rev. Rul. 80-218 only addressed federal tax returns, and not the other types of items specified in IRC Section 7502, above.

Obstacles Overseas Taxpayers Face in Timely Filing Their Tax Returns

U.S. taxpayers living overseas have faced many obstacles when mailing various tax documents to the IRS from foreign countries, though. For instance, Pekar v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 158 (1999), the Tax Court upheld the IRS’ determination that a taxpayer was liable for an addition to tax under IRC Section 6651(a)(1) for failing to file a tax return on or before the date prescribed for filing, despite the fact that the foreign postmark date that appeared on the envelope with the return was the return’s due date. The Tax Court held that Section 7502 did not apply to foreign postmarks, and that “foreign postmarks do not effectively cause the filing date of a document to be the postmark date.” In Action on Decision 2002-04, however, the IRS later filed a motion requesting that the Tax Court modify its opinion, and stated it would not follow the opinion regarding whether the late-filing addition to tax penalty applies.

Because of uncertainty that existed as to what types of private mail delivery services would be viewed as acceptable for filing a federal tax return outside of the U.S., Congress added IRC Section 7502(f). IRS Notice 2004-83 subsequently updated the list of designated private delivery services, including certain international private delivery services.

In Rev. Rul. 2002-23, the IRS additionally addressed some of the unresolved issues mentioned above resulting from Pekar and various revenue rulings. The Service held that it would accept federal tax returns properly meeting the requirements of Rev. Rul. 80-218, and that, “A federal tax return, claim for refund, statement, or other document required or permitted to be filed with the Service or with the United States Tax Court that is given to a designated international delivery service before midnight on the last date prescribed for filing shall be deemed timely filed pursuant to section 7502(a), (d)(1), and (f)(1).”

Subpart F Income- Traps for the Unwary

/in , /by

Under the IRS “Subpart F” rules (26 USC Part III, Subpart F), certain categories of income of controlled foreign corporations (“CFCs”) must be included in the gross income of specified U.S. shareholders, even though the income may not have been distributed.

In this article, we will explain the basics of Subpart F income. It is not intended to constitute tax or legal advice. Subpart F income is an extremely complex area of international tax law and U.S. taxpayers may face significant tax liabilities if they do not have proper tax planning for their CFCs. It is advisable to seek an experienced attorney. Sherayzen Law Office, Ltd. can assist you in all of your tax and legal needs, and help you avoid making costly mistakes.

Subpart F Income

Subpart F income is defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 952 to include numerous categories of income of a CFC. Specifically, it consists of insurance income (as defined in IRC section 953), IRC section 954 “foreign base company income”, income as determined under IRC section 952(a)(3) (amounts subject to the International Boycott rules of IRC section 999), illegal bribes, kickbacks, or other payments unlawful under the Foreign corrupt Practices Act of 1977, and income derived from any foreign country when IRC section 901(j) applies to such country.

Foreign base company income is comprised of the following items: foreign personal holding company income, foreign base company sales income, foreign base company services income, foreign base company shipping income, and foreign base company oil-related income.

Let’s analyze in slightly more detail one of the most common types of subpart F income for U.S. shareholders of a CFC- foreign personal holding company income.

Foreign Personal Holding Company Income

In general, foreign personal holding company income (FPHCI) includes the following items: dividends (or payments in lieu of dividends), rents, royalties, annuities, interest (and income equivalent to interest); net gains from the sale and exchange of certain properties (including gains from the sale or other disposition of any interest in a partnership or trust); gains from commodities transactions; net currency gains from nonfunctional transactions; and income from notional principal contracts.

Certain specific items are excluded from being treated as FPHCI. For example, dividends and interest received may be excluded if they are received from corporations that are related persons and organized in the same country with a substantial part of assets (more than 50 percent) used in its trade or business in that country. Another set of importance exclusions includes: rents and royalties received from unrelated persons in the ordinary conduct of business of the CFC or from related persons for use of property in country of organization; gains from the sale or exchange of inventory; dealer property; property that gives rise to active rent or royalty income; and property that was used in the CFC’s trade or business. In general, exclusions also exist for various insurance and banking business-related activities.

De Minimis Exclusion of Subpart F Income

IRC Section 954 sets forth the de minimis rule for exclusion of Subpart F income. This rule excludes all gross income for the taxable year from being treated as foreign base company income or insurance income if the sum of the CFC’s gross foreign base company income and gross insurance income is less than the lower of 5% of gross income or $1 million. On the other hand, it should be noted that, if the sum of foreign base company income and gross insurance income for the taxable year exceeds 70 percent of gross income, subject to certain provisions, then the entire gross income of the CFC will be treated as foreign base company income or insurance income.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help With Subpart F International Tax Issues

If you own a foreign corporation, you may be subject to Subpart F rules with complex compliance tax issues. These issues are so complex that you should approach them only with an experienced tax professional.

Our international tax firm is highly experienced in dealing with Controlled Foreign Corporations and Subpart F issues. Contact Sherayzen Law Office for professional help with Subpart F tax compliance and tax planning.