2012 OVDP: Principal Purpose of the Program

/in , , /by

As 2012 OVDP (Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program) now closed enters its second tax season, it is important to review once again the reasons behind the existence of the program, what it offers to the IRS and how it may benefit currently non-compliant U.S. taxpayers.

Focus on International Tax Compliance

Since 2003, the IRS has conducted a number of voluntary disclosure programs for U.S. taxpayers with undisclosed foreign accounts or entities and undisclosed income. It is important to emphasize that these programs were not part of the traditional IRS voluntary disclosure program with respect to domestic income. The focus of each offshore voluntary disclosure program is on international tax compliance, particularly Report on Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (the “FBAR”) and other informational returns such as Forms 5471, 8865, 8868 and so on.

It is important to note that with each new program the rules are becoming more and more stringent as well as complex. The idea behind the tougher terms of each succeeding program is to reward early disclosure and induce taxpayers to enter a voluntary disclosure program as soon as possible.

2012 OVDP

The 2012 OVDP came into existence less than half a year after the tremendous success of the 2011 OVDI (which also came two years after a very profitable 2009 OVDP). It is obvious that the IRS considered the existence of such voluntary disclosure programs a vital part of its international tax compliance efforts.

As expected, 2012 OVDP came in with tougher terms (for example, the highest penalty category is 27.5% instead of 25% as it was under 2011 OVDI rules), closed some 2011 OVDI loopholes and created a more complex and detailed set of rules. However, 2012 OVDP also has some unique features.

The most prominent of these features is that there is no official end to the program – this is the very first time in the history of the voluntary disclosure programs. At the time, the IRS warned that it can end the program at any time, creating a great sense of uncertainty and urgency for the taxpayers who wish to enter the program.

Why the IRS Created the 2012 OVDP

The most obvious reason (and the most repeated one in various articles by commentators) for why the IRS wants a voluntary disclosure program like 2012 OVDP in place is money – these programs brought in billions of dollars to the U.S. treasury. While this is an important reason, I believe that the reasoning behind the 2012 OVDP is much more complex.

In addition to bringing more money to the cash-starved U.S. government and allowing people to become tax-compliant with the understanding that their penalties will be definite and limited, there are two other primary reasons behind the 2012 OVDP and all other similar voluntary disclosure programs. First, the voluntary disclosure programs have a tremendous collateral impact on the overall international tax compliance. The collateral effect is reflected not only in assuring that the persons who go through the voluntary disclosure are likely to continue to comply with U.S .tax laws in the future, but also in the tremendous publicity of the program and the U.S. tax laws.

However, the most curious collateral product of the 2012 OVDP is the fear that induces wider tax compliance and more entrees into the voluntary disclosure program. It seems paradoxical that a voluntary disclosure would create this apprehensive feeling, but it is very logical once you understand that this is not a fear of the 2012 OVDP itself, but the terror of seeing widespread compliance which singles out the non-compliant taxpayers more and more with each new OVDP participant.

The second reason behind the voluntary disclosure programs is information gathering. Each 2012 OVDP participant brings a treasure trove of information about where they keep their money, the level of complicity by foreign banks, the particular foreign and domestic advisors involved in promoting international tax non-compliance, and other valuable information. This information allows the IRS to establish the overall patterns of non-compliance (both geographic and with respect to particular individuals and organizations), identify the next investigation targets and amass evidence for future prosecutions.

IRS is currently sitting on a mountain of data and it is inevitable that this information will be used in the future against non-compliant U.S. taxpayers and their foreign advisors. Already in 2012, we observed aggressive IRS moves in Liechtenstein and Israel as well as engagement of over 50 jurisdictions around the world regarding FATCA compliance. My prediction is that this trend of expanded enforcement into other countries will continue in 2013 and will result in larger number of prosecutions.

What is the Benefit of 2012 OVDP for U.S. Taxpayers

The 2012 OVDP does not only benefit the IRS, but also certain U.S. taxpayers. The benefit is at least three-fold. First, for certain U.S. taxpayers 2012 OVDP is the only way to avoid tremendous penalties and criminal prosecution by the IRS. Equally important is the fact that a taxpayer enters the OVDP program with an ability to calculate(with reasonable degree of certainty) the total cost of resolving all offshore tax issues. However, the decision to enter the OVDP must be made after all of the facts are analyzed and the taxpayer is aware of the consequences of entering the 2012 OVDP.

Second, while generally very rigid, the 2012 OVDP program has a certain degree of flexibility built into its penalty structure. The number of penalty categories and the various rules of the program allow international tax attorneys to determine the best mode of the voluntary disclosure and develop the strategies to implement this particular voluntary disclosure scenario.

Finally, 2012 OVDP allows international tax attorneys to determine the alternative voluntary disclosure ways. For example, Q&A #17 officially supports the long-standing unofficial policy of the IRS that no FBAR penalties are likely if there is additional U.S. tax liability as a result of voluntary disclosure. Moreover, the very fact that 2012 OVDP delineates certain analytical categories places additional tools for strategy development in the hands of the attorneys who seek alternative ways of bringing U.S. taxpayers into full compliance with U.S. tax laws under the existing legal structure outside of the 2012 OVDP.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help with Voluntary Disclosure

If you have undisclosed foreign account or foreign entities, contact Sherayzen Law Office for help with your voluntary disclosure. Our experienced international tax firm will thoroughly analyze your case, assess your FBAR liability as well as other applicable penalties, identify the options available in your case, and work with you every step of the way until your voluntary disclosure is finished. We have helped taxpayers around the world to do various types of voluntary disclosures, including the official Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Programs and Initiatives.

FBAR Filing: FinCEN’s Third Extension for Certain Signatory Authority Filers

/in , /by

In FinCEN Notice 2012-2, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced a third extension of time for certain Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) filings in light of ongoing consideration of questions regarding the filing requirement and its application to individuals with signature authority over but no financial interest in certain types of accounts. The new extended deadline is set for June 30, 2014.

This extended filing deadline applies only to the following classes of individuals:

1). An employee or officer of a covered entity (see 31 C.F.R. § 1010.350(f)(2)(i)-(v)) who has signature or other authority over and no financial interest in a foreign financial account of another entity more than 50 percent owned, directly or indirectly, by the entity (a “controlled person”). For this purpose, a “controlled person” is a U.S. or foreign entity that is more than 50% owned (directly or indirectly) by an excepted entity.
2). An employee or officer of a controlled person of a covered entity (see 31 C.F.R. § 1010.350(f)(2)(i)-(v)) who has signature or other authority over and no financial interest in a foreign financial account of the entity or another controlled person of the entity.
3). An employee or officer of an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission who has signature or other authority over and no financial interest in a foreign financial account of persons that are not investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Notice that categories 1 and 2 do not apply to companies that are not publicly traded or not SEC-registrants.

This extension comes after a series of earlier extensions by FinCEN. On February 14, 2012, FinCEN issued Notice 2012-1 to extend the filing date for FinCEN Form 114 Formerly TD F 90-22.1, FBAR, for certain individuals with signature authority over but no financial interest in one or more foreign financial accounts to June 30, 2013. This Notice was preceded by two earlier extensions: on May 31, 2011, FinCEN issued Notice 2011-1 (revised on June 2, 2011) to extend to June 30, 2012, the due date for filing the FBAR for certain individuals with signature authority over but no financial interest in one or more foreign financial accounts, specifically individuals whose FBAR filing requirements may be affected by the signature authority filing exceptions in 31 CFR § 1010.350(f)(2)(i)-(v). On June 17, 2011, FinCEN issued Notice 2011-2 similarly extending the FBAR filing due date to June 30, 2012, for certain employees or officers of investment advisers registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission who have signature authority over but no financial interest in certain foreign financial accounts.

The extension contained in FinCEN Notice 2012-2 is the third filing extension for individuals with signature authority over but no financial interest in certain types of accounts. It covers not only the reporting of signature authority held by such persons for 2012, but also for all other years for which filing was previously extended to June 30, 2012, under FinCEN Notices 2011-1 and 2011-2.

It is important to note, however, that all other taxpayers who are required to file an FBAR must still do so by June 30, 2013.

FBAR Attorney

/in , /by

If you are looking for an attorney to help you with your FBAR issues, contact Sherayzen Law Office.

Sherayzen Law Office is an international tax and business law firm that specializes in FBAR compliance among other international tax issues. Our office is located in Minneapolis, but we have clients throughout the United States and overseas.

Helping U.S. taxpayers who have FBAR issues is one of our most important specializations. FinCEN Form 114 formerly Form TD F 90-22.1, the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (commonly known as the “FBAR”), is not the most complex form in the Internal Revenue Code, but it is definitely one of the most severe forms when it comes to penalties. A lot of U.S. taxpayers either do not know about this form, do not realize how important it is, or they already realized that they should have filed the FBAR earlier and do not know how to get out of the vicious cycle of non-compliance.

Our international tax firm is highly experienced in these delinquent FBAR matters, including the voluntary disclosure process. We will analyze your case thoroughly, determine your FBAR liability and identify your voluntary disclosure options. Once you make your choice with respect to your voluntary disclosure option, we will create and implement a customized case strategy, including preparation of all of the necessary tax forms and legal briefs.

Clients of Sherayzen Law Office enjoy the personal attention of Mr. Eugene Sherayzen, the firm’s owner, who will be working with you throughout the process in order to make sure that your case proceeds efficiently. He is easily accessible by phone and email throughout the case.

We believe that each case is unique, especially in such complex matters as FBAR voluntary disclosure. Our international tax law firm will be looking for the unique features in your particular fact pattern to determine the most expeditious and favorable manner to proceed with your case.

One the biggest problems facing U.S. taxpayers in finding the right FBAR representation at this point is the tendency among some accounting firms and even law firms to disregard the special circumstances of a case and automatically channel their clients into the 2012 OVDP (Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program) at the highest penalty rates with the idea that they will figure out later what the strategy of the case will be and whether the taxpayer needs to opt-out of the program.

We believe that this is an incorrect approach which completely disregards the individual circumstances of each taxpayer and may subject them to an unnecessarily high penalties and additional legal and accounting fees. Each case should be thoroughly analyzed at the beginning of the process before the taxpayers enters the 2012 OVDP, not in the middle or even at the end of the voluntary disclosure.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help with FBARs

If you have any undisclosed foreign financial accounts, contact Sherayzen Law Office as soon as possible for an individual, comprehensive, creative and ethical approach to your voluntary disclosure process.

FBAR Lawyers Minneapolis

/in , /by

Sherayzen Law Office is a premier international law firm that specializes in FBAR compliance among other international tax issues. The firm is headquartered in Minneapolis, but it serves clients throughout the United States and overseas.

FinCEN Form 114 formerly Form TD F 90-22.1, the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (commonly known as the “FBAR”), is not the most complex form in the Internal Revenue Code, but it is definitely one of the most severe forms when it comes to penalties. A lot of U.S. taxpayers either do not know about this form, do not realize how important it is, or they already realized that they should have filed the FBAR earlier and do not know how to get out of the vicious cycle of non-compliance.

Helping these taxpayers is our specialty. Our international tax firm is highly specialized and experienced in the FBAR matters, including FBAR voluntary disclosure. We will analyze your case thoroughly, determine what your FBAR liability is (because this is not a straightforward matter and there are a lot of factors that influence your potential FBAR penalties) and identify your voluntary disclosure options.

Once you have made your choice with respect to your voluntary disclosure, we will proceed with implementing your customized case strategy. Attorney Eugene Sherayzen will personally be working with you throughout the case; we will prepare all of the required documentation (including any tax forms and the necessary legal briefs), submit all documentation to the IRS and rigorously represent your interests before the IRS throughout the voluntary disclosure process.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help with FBARs

If you have any undisclosed foreign financial accounts, contact Sherayzen Law Office as soon as possible. The earlier you contact us, the sooner we can schedule a consultation to review your case. It is highly important that you contact Sherayzen Law Office before the IRS begins its investigation of your undisclosed accounts, because such investigations may preclude the availability of some of the voluntary disclosure options.

IRS FY 2012 Performance Results

/in , /by

The IRS released the statement describing its performance in the Fiscal Year 2012. The general results continued last year’s trend.

In the enforcement area, audits of individuals topped 1 million for the sixth year in a row, with a 1.03% coverage rate out of all tax returns filed. Audits in the upper income ranges remained substantially higher than other categories.

With respect to businesses, the IRS increased examinations across all categories of business returns by more than 12% in FY 2012, with the largest increases coming in audits of flow-through entities, which include partnerships and Subchapter S corporations. The examination rate exceeded 20% for the largest corporations.

IRS enforcement was highly profitable for the U.S. government, especially in the area of voluntary disclosures (such as 2009 OVDP, 2011 OVDI and 2012 OVDP). The IRS collected more than $50 billion in enforcement revenue in FY 2012, the third year in a row topping that figure. However, the 2012 numbers were lower than 2010 and 2011, which were unusual years with enforcement dollars helped by large numbers of offshore tax cases coming in. More than 38,000 disclosures of offshore accounts have been made to date through the IRS’ offshore voluntary disclosure programs. In addition, the economic slowdown contributed to lower enforcement figures, as most enforcement dollars collected resulted from audits of returns for years during the slowdown.

In terms of staffing, however, the IRS again suffered from the cuts to its budget by the Congress, despite extensive evidence that investment in IRS enforcement brings disproportionate amount of income to U.S. government. After a nearly flat budget in FY 2011, the IRS’ FY 2012 budget was reduced by $305 million. This reduction affected the level of staffing available to deliver service and enforcement programs. Overall full-time staffing has declined by more than 8% over the last two years, and staffing for key enforcement occupations fell nearly 6% in the past year.

One exception to the staffing problems has been identify theft. In FY 2012, the IRS more than doubled the number of staff dedicated to preventing refund fraud and assisting taxpayers victimized by identity theft, with more than 3,000 employees working in this area. As a result of these increased efforts, the IRS in FY 2012 was able to prevent the issuance of more than 3 million fraudulent refunds worth more than $20 billion, an increase from approximately 1.8 million refunds worth about $14 billion the previous year.

On the service side, the IRS saw continued strong growth in electronic filing by individuals, as the e-filing rate in FY 2012 exceeded 80% for the first time. Taxpayer interest in online interactions continued to increase as well, with web page visits on IRS.gov up nearly 17% to 372 million.

One of the most surprising trends has been the steady increase in criminal investigations and the growth in the conviction rate. The number of criminal investigations for tax and tax-related matters has gone up from the low of 1,269 investigation in 2009 to 1,846 in 2012 – a whopping 45% increase. During the same time, the conviction rate went up from 87.2% in 2009 to 93.0% in 2012. This means that the IRS is not only radically increasing the number of criminal investigations, but also it is more successful in its prosecution efforts.

Overall, 2012 appears to have been a successful year for the IRS, especially with respect to international tax enforcement.