Tax Lawyers Minneapolis | 7 Reasons To File Tax Return Even if You Do Not Have to Do It

In some case, you may want to file a tax return even though you do not have to. Here are the top seven reasons for this course of action for the tax year 2010.

1. Tax Refund. If federal income tax was withheld from your paycheck, you made estimated tax payments, or had a prior year overpayment applied to this year’s tax, you may be entitled to a tax refund. You will only be able to get it if you file a tax return.

2. Making Work Pay Tax Credit. You may be able to take this credit if you had earned income from work. The maximum credit for a married couple filing a joint return is $800 and $400 for other taxpayers.

3. Earned Income Tax Credit (“EITC”). You may qualify for EITC if you worked, but did not earn a lot of money. Remember, EITC is a refundable tax credit; this means you could qualify for a tax refund.

4. Additional Child Tax Credit. This is also a refundable tax credit. It may be available to you if you have at least one qualifying child and you did not get the full amount of the Child Tax Credit.

5. American Opportunity Tax Credit. The maximum credit per student is $2,500 and the first four years of post-secondary education qualify.

6. First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit. In order too qualify for the credit, you must have bought – or entered into a binding contract to buy – a principal residence located in the United States on or before April 30, 2010. If you entered into a binding contract by April 30, 2010, you must have closed on the home on or before September 30, 2010. The credit is a maximum of $8,000 or $4,000 if your filing status is married filing separately. If you bought a home as your principle residence in 2010, you may be able to qualify and claim the credit even if you already owned a home. In this case, the maximum credit for long-time residents is $6,500, or $3,250 if your filing status is married filing separately.

7. Health Coverage Tax Credit. Certain individuals, who are receiving Trade Adjustment Assistance, Reemployment Trade Adjustment Assistance, or pension benefit payments from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, may be eligible for a Health Coverage Tax Credit. The credit is worth 80% of monthly health insurance premiums when you file your 2010 tax return.

If you have questions with respect to whether you should file your tax return, contact Sherayzen Law Office NOW and discuss your case with an experienced Minneapolis tax attorney!

Contract Lawyers: Top Legal Fee Issues

Legal fees usually constitute a top concern for potential clients who wish to retain a St. Paul contract attorney.  In this essay, I would like to point out the top three legal fee issues that are usually associated with retaining a contract lawyer in St. Paul, Minnesota.

1. Payment Structure

There are three main models of payment that St. Paul contract lawyers use: hourly fee, contingency fee, and flat fee. The most common payment structure is hourly fee. This arrangement occurs where a contract attorney is paid based on how much time he spends on a case. If you’re paying your St. Paul contract lawyer by the hour, the agreement should set out the hourly rates of the business attorney and anyone else in this attorney’s office who might work on the case.

The contingency fee is relatively rare in a contract litigation setting, and virtually non-existent in the contract drafting and negotiations. This payment structure is characterized by payment to a contract lawyer of a mutually-agreed percentage of recovery (or contract amount) at the end of a case.

In a flat-fee arrangement, you pay an agreed-upon amount of money for a project Flat-fee payment is often used by St. Paul contract lawyers only in certain contract drafting situations. Usually, these situations are characterized by predominance of one party over another (for example, in employment context) or there has been an established consensus among parties (for example, in partnership agreement context). Flat fee, however, is less used where contract negotiation is required, and this payment structure is almost non-existent in contract litigation context (unless, a very large retainer is involved). Generally, flat fees are disliked by St. Paul contract attorneys due to its inflexibility. On the other hands, I have seen how a combination of a flat fee payment structure with hourly fees appeals to many clients while it reduces the inflexibility inherent in a simple flat-fee context.

Finally, as I just hinted above, it is possible to merge various payment structures to create a fee arrangement most agreeable to the parties.

2. Timing of Payment

Where hourly-fee arrangement is used, St. Paul contract lawyers usually bill their clients on a monthly basis. In a flat-fee arrangement, a contract attorney would prefer to receive at least half of the payment before he begins to work on a project. In any case, a retainer is usually required by St. Paul contract attorneys.

3. Retainer Fee

Most contract lawyers in St. Paul require their client to pay a retainer. Retainer can mean two different fee arrangements. First, retainer may be the amount of money a client pays to guarantee a contract lawyer’s commitment to the case. Under this arrangement, the retainer is not a form of an advance payment for future work, but a non-refundable deposit to secure the lawyer’s availability. Second, a retainer is simply the amount of money a St. Paul contract attorney asks his client to pay in advance. In this scenario, the lawyer usually deposits the retainer in a client trust account and withdraws money from it for the work completed according to the fee agreement. The fee agreement should specify the amount of the retainer and when the lawyer can withdraw money form the client trust account (usually, on a monthly basis).

Conclusion

Obviously, the three issues discussed above do not cover all of the issues associated with legal fees when you are hiring St. Paul contract lawyers. These three issues, however, are likely to provide the necessary background for you to understand the basics of the legal fee arrangements with your St. Paul contract attorney.

One of the key areas of our practice at Sherayzen Law Office is contract law. We are highly experienced in the matters of contract drafting, negotiation, and litigation. We also regularly offer our contract review and consultation services to our clients throughout Minnesota.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office NOW to discuss your contract with an experienced contract lawyer!

Tax Lawyers Minneapolis: Preparing for Initial Consultation II (for Individuals)

In previous article, I discussed the first part of preparation for an initial consultation with Minneapolis tax lawyers; the first part was mainly concerned with what type of information you should bring to your Minneapolis tax attorney. In this essay, I shift the focus toward the second part of the preparation which is about what type of questions you need to ask your tax lawyer.

Usually, the questions that you want your tax attorney to answer should, at the very least, cover the following four areas:

1. Cost and Billing

One of most important areas that you need to cover is the cost of the case as well as the manner in which you will be billed. Unless this is a flat-fee case, you should not expect your attorney to give you a precise amount of money you will need to spend on your case. Usually, your tax lawyer will give you an estimate, which, in the end, may or may not correspond to the actual cost of the case. I usually provide a fairly conservative estimate and it is rare for my clients to pay above the estimate; usually, it occurs where a client fails to fully disclose the circumstances of the case or otherwise causes a significant delay in the proceedings of the case.

In terms of the manner of billing, you are likely to billed per hour in most tax litigation and voluntary disclosure matters. Regular tax returns, especially for returning clients whose circumstances have not changed in any significant way, are usually subject to a flat fee.

2. Time

The next area you should question your Minneapolis tax attorney about is how long the case will need to be conducted. The estimates here are likely to vary significantly. While it is fairly easy to predict when a tax return will be finished, it is much harder to estimate an amount of time a voluntary disclosure process may take (especially if more issues come up during the disclosure process).

3. Participation

Ask your Minneapolis tax lawyer about who will handle your case – i.e. whether the attorney will handle it personally or turn it over to his associates. When you are dealing with a large law firm, you run the risk that the attorney with whom you are having the initial consultation will not be the one handling your case, especially if you are a small business or an individual. Due to common division of labor in large law firms, it is very likely that the case will be turned over to inexperienced associates whose work will be only reviewed by the attorney who conducted the initial consultation.

If, however, you are hiring a small firm or a solo practitioner, you are very likely to avoid this problem and your case will be handled from the beginning through the end by your experienced tax lawyer who is probably an owner of the law firm and personally responsible for the case.

4. Percentage of Practice

Ask your Minneapolis tax lawyer about how much time per month, on the average, he devotes to his tax practice. At the very minimum, your tax attorney should devote about 25% of his practice to tax law. If, however, the attorney has specialized associates (for example, someone who is a lawyer and a CPA), then he can have a lower percentage devoted to tax law because he may work closely with his experienced and specialized associate.

Conclusion

While these four questions do not represent a complete list of questions you should ask your tax attorney, they are likely to provide that minimum background necessary for the review of a retainer agreement with your Minneapolis tax lawyer.

Sherayzen Law Office can help you with your tax issues, whether you want to check your tax return, negotiate with the IRS, or engage in complex tax planning.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office NOW to discuss your tax case with an experienced Minneapolis tax attorney!

Tax Lawyers Minneapolis: Preparing for Initial Consultation I (for Individuals)

A little disclaimer first: this article is concerned only with individuals contacting Minneapolis tax lawyers for a consultation. I will discuss preparation of business owners for an initial tax consultation in another article.

There are two sides to your preparation for the initial consultation with your Minneapolis tax lawyer. First, the information you need to supply to your tax attorney. Second, the questions you want to ask your tax lawyer. This essay deals with the first part of the preparation.

It is important to understand that your Minneapolis tax attorney will initially have to rely almost exclusively on the information that you supply to him. Moreover, failure to supply the necessary information during initial consultation may lead to significant delays in your case and increase your legal expenses. This is why it is very important to come prepared to the initial interview.

Below, you will find a number of suggestions about how to prepare for the initial consultation with your Minneapolis tax attorney. These suggestions come from my personal experience when I had to advice my clients on what to bring with them to the interview in order to maximize the efficiency of the case and my ability to provide sound tax advice.

The first step is to ask your tax attorney about what you should bring with you. The most common response is that you should bring all documents that are related to your case. Usually, however, I would list specific documents which are customary in a given tax situation. Unfortunately, I have found that a lot of clients, for various reasons, are not willing to bring many of these documents but only what they think a Minneapolis tax lawyer needs. Later on, this usually leads to repetitive documentary requests by a tax attorney from his clients.

“Everything related to the case” usually includes all official documents, accounting documents, e-mails, letters, corporate tax documents, et cetera. Sometimes, this would mean divulging sensitive financial information. For example, if you have foreign bank accounts and you are retaining your attorney to help resolve an FBAR issue, then these bank accounts will need to be submitted to your tax lawyer as well.

The next step is for you to review what documents you actually have. The exact list of documents may differ depending on your particular situation; however, here is a non-exclusive list of the most usual documents you need to bring to your tax attorney:

a) Tax returns: copies of your tax returns, usually going back three tax years. Your tax attorney, however, may advise you to bring tax returns for the past six years in certain situation;
b) Supporting documentation for tax returns (including deductions and credits): usually, you do not have to provide it for the initial interview unless this is relevant to your case (for example, you are contacting a tax attorney to file a tax return);
c) Housing documents: this issue usually comes up with respect to claiming first-time homebuyer tax credit or for tax planning purposes.
d) IRS correspondence: all relevant IRS correspondence should be provided to your tax lawyer;
e) Your correspondence: letters, e-mails, faxes, et cetera if they are relevant to your case;
f) Business/Investment documentation: I discuss preparation for a business-related tax consultation in another article, but it is important to mention here that if your individual tax issue is related to your business or investment activities, then you should bring relevant business documents (incorporation documents, business structure documentation, business tax I.D. number, et cetera);
g) Any other documents relevant to your case: if there is anything else that you think is relevant to your case, then bring it with you. I once had a client who brought carton boxes with unique ID numbers on them.

The third step is to find out what information you are missing. Compare the information you obtained from the second step with the list of documents your attorney provided and what you think is relevant to the case. Identify the documents that are missing and try to obtain the missing information before meeting with your tax attorney. If this is not possible, then let your attorney know during the consultation what information you are missing and whether you will be able to find it after the meeting.

Once you go through these three steps, the first part of the your preparation for the initial tax consultation is finished. I will discuss the second part of your preparation in the next article.

Remember, Sherayzen Law Office can help you with your tax issues, whether you want to check your tax return, negotiate with the IRS, or engage in complex tax planning.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office NOW to discuss your tax case with an experienced tax attorney!

Estate Planning Lawyers Minneapolis | Latest Estate and Gift Tax Cuts

Prior to the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (the “Act”) and after abolishment of the estate tax for decedents dying in 2010, the estate tax was scheduled to return in the tax year 2011 with a maximum tax rate of 55% and a $1 million exclusion.

Under the Act, however, the maximum estate tax rate for decedents dying on or after January 1, 2011, is 35% and an applicable exclusion amount is $5 million ($10 million for married couples) for decedents dying on or after January 1, 2011, and on or before December 31, 2012. The Act also reinstates the stepped-up basis regime for assets included in the estate.

Similarly, the maximum gift tax rate will be 35% for the tax years 2011 and 2012 with a maximum applicable exclusion amount of $5 million. It is important to note that for gifts made after December 31, 2009, and before January 1, 2011, the gift tax is computed based on a top tax rate of 35% and a maximum applicable exclusion amount of $1 million.

Note that the Act includes additional provisions on the estate and gift taxes. For example, estates of decedents who died after December 31, 2009 but before January 1, 2011, may elect to apply the 35% rate and stepped-up basis regime instead of the carryover basis regime otherwise applicable for 2010. The Act further includes a “portability” provision which would allow a surviving spouse to take advantage of the unused portion of the estate tax exclusion of his or her predeceased spouse, thereby providing the surviving spouse with a larger exclusion amount.