Payroll Tax Cut Extended to the End of 2012 and Revised Form 941

/in , /by

On February 23, 2012, the Internal Revenue Service released revised Form 941 enabling employers to properly report the newly-extended payroll tax cut benefiting nearly 160 million workers.

The IRS needed to revise Form 941 due to the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (enacted on February 22, 2012). Under the new law, the social security tax cut was continued until the end of 2012. This means that employees will continue to receive larger paychecks for the rest of this year based on a lower social security tax withholding rate of 4.2 percent, which is two percentage points less than the 6.2 percent rate in effect prior to 2011. This reduced rate, originally in effect for all of 2011, was extended through the end of February by the Temporary Payroll Tax Cut Continuation Act of 2011 (enacted in December of 2011).

The new law also repeals the two-percent recapture tax included in the December legislation that effectively capped at $18,350 the amount of wages eligible for the payroll tax cut. As a result, the now repealed recapture tax does not apply.

Self-employed individuals will also benefit from a comparable rate reduction in the social security portion of the self-employment tax from 12.4 percent to 10.4 percent.

For the tax year 2012, the social security tax applies to the first $110,100 of wages and net self-employment income received by an individual.

Revised Form 941 Will Need to Be Filed By Employers

The revised Form 941 is already available and will have to be filed by employers for every quarter of 2012. Failure to file Form 941 may lead to significant penalties.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office to Deal With Form 941 Penalties

If you are facing Form 941 penalties, contact Sherayzen Law Office NOW. Our experienced tax firm will rigorously and skillfully represent your interests in the IRS negotiations with respect to any Form 941 penalties.

IRS Power to Reallocate Income, Deductions, and Other Items under IRC Section 482

/in , /by

Some taxpayers may be tempted, especially in situations involving related parties, to arbitrarily shift the source of income or allocation of deductions, in order to avoid or lessen taxes.  Congress, however, enacted IRC Section 482 to give the IRS wide power to prevent such actions.  This article will give a brief overview of some aspects of this complex area of U.S. tax system.

IRS Authority under IRC Section 482

In general, IRC Section 482 gives the IRS the ability to distribute, apportion, or allocate gross income, deductions, credits or allowances between certain organizations if they are controlled or owned by the same taxpayers, and it is determined that such action is necessary to prevent tax evasion, or to clearly reflect such organizations’ income.  The IRS has broad authority under this section (and the definition of “control” is similarly interpreted broadly); taxpayers, on the other hand, are generally not able to use this section to reallocate income, deductions or other items on their own.

IRS authority under this section to make such determinations is generally granted whenever taxpayers report different income, deductions, or other related items than they would have had if the taxpayers made an arm’s-length transaction with organizations that were not controlled or owned by them.  Various methods are available to the IRS to determine the proper arm’s-length price.

In the context of international taxation, one of the purposes of this section is to prevent taxpayers from improperly shifting income to controlled organizations in countries with lower tax rates (or conversely, transferring deductions to controlled organizations in high tax rate countries).

Penalties under IRC Section 482

Severe penalties may apply under IRC Section 482.  IRC 6662(e)(1)(B) imposes transfer pricing penalties on any underpayment attributable to a “substantial valuation misstatement” pertaining to transfer pricing. There are two types of transfer pricing penalties under this particular provision: (A) the transactional penalty, which applies when the price reported for any property or services is 200% or more (or 50% or less) of the amount determined to be the proper price, and (B) the net adjustment penalty, which applies when the net IRC 482 adjustment (i.e. the reallocation of profit determined by the IRS) exceeds the lesser of $5 million or 10% of a taxpayer’s gross receipts.  An accuracy-related penalty of 20% may be applied in such circumstances.  Further, under IRC Section 6662(h), a 40% penalty for “gross misstatements” (as defined in the provision) may be applied.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Legal Advice on Business Transactions and Structure

The powers of the IRS under IRS Section 482 are broad and the penalties can be substantial.  Therefore, it is important to contact a business tax attorney to plan the business transactions and business structure ahead of time, identifying the problem areas and accurately evaluating the risk of potential IRS actions.

This is why you should contact the experienced business tax firm of Sherayzen Law Office for legal help with analyzing your business structure and planning your business transactions.

Making the Section 338(g) Election when Purchasing a Target Corporation’s Stock

/in , /by

This article will explain Internal Revenue Code Section 338(g), which allows corporations, that buy a certain percentage of a target corporation’s stock and meet certain requirements, to make an election to treat the acquisition as an asset purchase instead of a stock purchase. In the right circumstances, a Section 338(g) election can be a very useful tool for tax purposes; however there are certain drawbacks, so you should consult an experienced tax attorney to determine whether the election would be a sound decision for your corporation.

Requirements for Section 338(g) Election

In general, in order to make an Section 338(g) election, the purchasing corporation must acquire through a “qualified stock purchase” 80% or more of the total voting power and 80% or more of the total value of the stock of the target corporation within a 12-month period. Preferred stocks are not counted for either purpose.

The election may only be made in taxable stock sales, and the purchaser must be a C corporation. Thus, individuals, partnerships and similar entities are not eligible to make the election. A corporation may purchase a foreign corporation and make the election; however, there are many complex international tax issues that may arise (such as the Subpart F rules).

Once the election is made, the target corporation is deemed as having sold all of its assets in a single transaction; it will be treated as a new corporation which purchased all of the assets of and is unrelated (for most purposes) to the old target corporation. The new (target) corporation also assumes any liabilities of the old target corporation.

Treatment of Basis of Stock & Assets

Normally, when a corporation purchases the net assets of a target company in a taxable stock sale, the purchaser will take a carryover basis in the acquired assets. However, by electing Section 338(g), purchasers will be allowed to take a stepped-up basis at the fair market value purchase price (as well as taking the stock at the FMV price), and the transaction will be deemed for the purposes of the section, as an asset sale. The election is made unilaterally by the purchasing corporation.

Main Advantages and Disadvantages of the Election

The primary advantage of a Section 338(g) election is that by treating the purchase as an asset sale, the purchaser is likely to be able to deduct depreciation and amortization expenses associated with the assets and intangibles; other tax credits may also apply.

The primary disadvantage, however, is that the deemed asset sale may trigger a taxable gain for the acquiring corporation. Conversely, the target corporation’s shareholders will be treated as having sold their shares, and thus will have a taxable gain or loss on the sale of their stock.

Thus, an acquiring corporation must consider whether making the election is worthwhile from a tax perspective. Generally, usable tax credits or Net Operating Losses of the target corporation will be necessary in order to consider making the election.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Tax Planning Help With Business Acquisitions

If you are planning to acquire another business and would like to explore the tax consequences of such purchase (or explore alternative structuring of such purchase), contact Sherayzen Law Office. Our tax firm has extensive knowledge of corporate tax law and we will use our reliable experience to help you achieve your acquisition goals in a tax-sensitive way.

Minnesota Department of Revenue Launches New e-Services System

/in , /by

On October 3, 2011, the Minnesota Department of Revenue announced the launch of its new e-Services online system. This new system is replacing e-File Minnesota and will offer a wider variety of services to 400,000 business taxpayers. The new system was the product of at least four years of diligent work by the Department.

The new E-Services not only provides the ability for business taxpayers to file and pay their taxes, it also allows taxpayers to update their contact information, register new accounts, and send the department secured messages. In addition, business taxpayers will have the ability to view all account information in one location. They can now view their payment history, returns they have filed and all correspondence sent to them by the Department of Revenue.

The functionality being added provides more security flexibility to the business taxpayer. Businesses can create unique user ID’s and passwords which grant online access to tax practitioners and accounts they partner with.

Finally, e-Services will also allow self-service activities 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Business taxpayers now have the ability to handle their tax needs online when it is convenient for them.

The transition to the new system will begin on October 17, 2011 and is currently projected to finish by mid-January of 2012. During the transition, groups of taxpayers will be added each Monday, until all 400,000 business taxpayers have access to e-Services.

IRS Issues Guidance on Tax Treatment of Cell Phones

/in , , /by

On September 14, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service issued guidance designed to clarify the tax treatment of employer-provided cell phones.

The guidance relates to Section 2043 of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, Pub.L.No. 111-240 (enacted last fall) that removed cell phones from the definition of listed property, a category under tax law that normally requires additional recordkeeping by taxpayers.

Generally, a fringe benefit provided by an employer to an employee is presumed to be income to the employee unless it is specifically excluded from gross income by another section of the Code. (See Income Tax Regulations § 1.61-21(a)).

Pursuant to Notice 2011-72, the employer- provided cell phones are treated as an excludible fringe benefit. The Notice further provides that when an employer provides an employee with a cell phone primarily for noncompensatory business reasons, the business and personal use of the cell phone is generally nontaxable to the employee. The IRS will not require recordkeeping of business use in order to receive this tax-free treatment.

Simultaneously with the Notice, the IRS announced in a memo to its examiners a similar administrative approach that applies with respect to arrangements common to small businesses that provide cash allowances and reimbursements for work-related use of personally-owned cell phones. Under this approach, employers that require employees, primarily for noncompensatory business reasons, to use their personal cell phones for business purposes may treat reimbursements of the employees’ expenses for reasonable cell phone coverage as nontaxable. This treatment does not apply to reimbursements of unusual or excessive expenses or to reimbursements made as a substitute for a portion of the employee’s regular wages.

Under the guidance issued today, where employers provide cell phones to their employees or where employers reimburse employees for business use of their personal cell phones, tax-free treatment is available without burdensome recordkeeping requirements. The guidance does not apply to the provision of cell phones or reimbursement for cell-phone use that is not primarily business related, as such arrangements are generally taxable.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office NOW for Legal Help Regarding Your Business Tax Issues!

If you have any questions or concerns regarding this or any other business tax issues, contact Sherayzen Law Office. Our experienced tax firm will guide you through the complex issues of business taxation, help you deal with current business transactions, as well as create a comprehensive business tax plan that allows you to take advantage of the existing Tax Code’s provision and engage in proactive tax planning.