international tax lawyer st paul

US-Canada Tax Treaty: Beware of Income Exemption Traps

/in , , /by

Are you a US taxpayer earning income in Canada? Do you rely upon the US-Canada tax treaty (officially known as, The Convention with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, U.S.-Can., Sept. 26, 1980, T.I.A.S. No. 11,087) exemptions to claim deductions or limit reporting of income for US tax purposes?

If so, then you need to be aware that the tax treaty between the US and Canada does not always provide protections for US taxpayers- even if the treaty specifically states so. A recent example is the Jamieson v. Commissioner case.

In Jamieson v. Commissioner, 08-1253, the taxpayers were US citizens living, and earning income, in Canada in 2003. After paying their Canadian taxes, they claimed the foreign tax credit on their US tax returns, resulting in a net liability. They did not compute any AMT liability under the provisions of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 55, taking the position that the Article XXIV of The US-Canada Treaty, limiting double taxation, precluded such a liability.

However, the IRS argued that under IRC Section 59(a)(2), enacted as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, which reduced the foreign tax for AMT purposes to 90% of a taxpayer’s AMT liability, an AMT liability existed. (Section 59(a)(2) was repealed in relevant part by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004).

The US Tax Court ruled for the IRS. A Federal District Appeals Court affirmed, determining that Section 59(a)(2) superseded the US-Canadian Tax Treaty. The court held that the US Supreme Court case Whitney v. Robertson “last-in-time” rule governed in the case, in examining conflicts between treaties and statutes. The rule provides that when an inconsistency exists, whichever enactments came later in time will prevail over earlier ones.

Thus, the court determined that Section 59(a)(2) superseded the treaty, and was thus the last expression of the sovereign will. Furthermore, the court cited a DC Court of Appeals case in which it was determined that the IRS Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, specifying that Section 59(a)(2) and other applicable sections was intended by Congress to supersede any conflicting treaty provisions.

This article is intended to give a brief summary of these issues, and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. Reporting foreign-earned income often necessitates an experienced understanding of complex regulations, IRC statutes, and case law, especially since the IRS penalties for failure to comply can be substantial.

If you have further questions regarding your own tax circumstances, Sherayzen Law Office offers professional advice for all of your cross-border, international, and other tax needs. Call (952) 500-8159 for a consultation today.

Non-Resident Alien Spouse and Joint U.S. Tax Return

/in , , /by

This article will cover the options that are available for married couples where one spouse is a non-resident alien and the other is a U.S. citizen. A nonresident alien is an alien who has not passed the green card test or the “substantial presence test” under IRS rules. For the purposes of this article, a “married couple” will refer solely to this specific situation.

Election to File Joint Return

Although a non-resident alien who does not have U.S. source income is generally not required to file a U.S. tax return, in some instances it may be beneficial for a non-resident alien married to a U.S. citizen to do so. If the married couple meets certain criteria, they may elect to file a joint return.

The criteria is as follows: A married couple may elect to treat the non-resident alien as a U.S. resident, if the couple is married at the end of the taxable year. This also includes instances in which one of the spouses is a non-resident alien at the beginning of the year, but becomes a resident alien at the end of the year, and the other spouse is a non-resident alien at the end of the year.

Reason for Electing to File a Joint Return

There are numerous reasons why a non-resident alien in a married couple may elect to file a joint return. For instance, the non-resident alien may have U.S. source income, in which case U.S. taxes will likely be owed in any event. Thus, filing a joint return may result in less taxes paid, depending on tax brackets, type of income and applicable deductions.

It may also make sense in certain circumstances for a non-resident alien who does not have U.S. source income to file a joint return. Additionally, a non-resident alien filing a joint return may be allowed to claim possible credits on foreign income taxes paid, such as the Foreign Tax Credit.

Note however, in certain circumstances, the non-resident alien spouse of the married couple filing the joint return may still be treated as a non-resident alien (such as for the tax purposes of IRC Chapter 3 Withholding, Social Security, or Medicare).

Applicable Rules

Married couples must file a joint return in the year they first elect to treat the non-resident alien as a resident alien for tax purposes. Both spouses will be considered to be residents for tax purposes for all years that the election is in effect. While a joint income return must be filed for the year the election is made, a joint or separate return may be filed in later years.

By electing to file the joint return, both spouses must report all worldwide income on the return. In general, neither spouse will be able to claim tax treaty benefits as a resident of a foreign country in the years in which the election is made, although this will depend upon the specifics of each treaty.

Making The Election

Married couples may make the election by attaching a statement, signed by both spouses, to the joint return for the first tax year that the election is made. (See specific IRS requirements for more details). Married couples may also make the election by filing a amended Form 1040X joint tax return (however, any tax returns filed after the tax year of the amended return must also be amended).

Ending or Suspending the Election

Once the election is made, it will apply to all subsequent tax years, unless it is ended or suspended. An election may be ended by various means, such as the death of either spouse, legal separation, revocation by either spouse, or inadequate records (See Publication 519, U.S. Tax Guide for Aliens, for more details). Once the election is ended, neither spouse may make the election in subsequent tax years.

An election is suspended if neither spouse is a US citizen or resident alien at any time during a later tax year. Married couples may resume the election however if the required criteria are eventually met again in subsequent tax years.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office

This article is intended to give you a brief summary of these issues. If you have further questions regarding these matters as it pertains to your own tax circumstances, Sherayzen Law Office offers professional advice in all of your tax and international tax needs. Call now at (952) 500-8159 to discuss your tax situation with an experienced international tax attorney.

Tax Treaties

/in , , , /by

Tax treaties are bilateral agreements between two countries that generally provide relief from taxation for individuals who are covered. The U.S. has tax treaties with more than 50 different countries. The U.S. has a formulated a Model Income Tax Treaty to assist in negotiations of future tax treaties. In general, treaties will grant one country primary taxing rights to items of income, and the other country will be required to give a credit for taxes paid.

Primary taxing rights typically depend on either the residency of taxpayers, or the presence of a permanent establishment in a treaty country. A permanent establishment generally is defined to be a branch, factory, office, workshop, mining site, warehouse, or other fixed places of business.

Under most tax treaties, residents (and sometimes, citizens or nationals) of foreign countries will be exempt from U.S. taxes on certain items of income, and taxed at a reduced rate on other specified items. For example, many U.S. tax treaties reduce the withholding tax rate on interest and dividends, and other certain kinds of investment income. The rates and items of taxation vary according to the terms of each treaty. If there is no tax treaty between the U.S. and another country, or a treaty does not cover a certain type of income, a resident (national or citizen, if applicable) of a country will be subject to U.S. taxes.

Under these same tax treaties, though U.S. residents or citizens are subject to U.S. income tax on their worldwide income, they will be exempt from tax, or taxed at a lower rate, in general on certain items of income sourced from another country subject to the tax treaty. Many treaties utilize savings clauses to prevent U.S. residents or citizens from using provisions of a treaty to avoid paying taxes on U.S. source income.

Do you have questions concerning international tax issues? Contact Sherayzen Law Office at (952) 500-8159 to discuss your tax situation with an experienced tax attorney.

Sourcing of Income

/in , , , /by

The sourcing of income has very important tax consequences for U.S. and foreign taxpayers.  The IRS taxes U.S. taxpayers on all income, from any source derived; however, U.S. taxpayers will be relieved of double taxation and may utilize the foreign tax credit in many circumstances involving non-purely domestic taxation. Foreign taxpayers, on the other hand, will usually only pay U.S. taxes on income sourced in the U.S. Thus, the source of income rules are critical to determining where a taxpayer will pay applicable taxes. This article will examine both income sourced inside the U.S. and foreign-source income.

Income Source Determination

In order to determine the sourcing of income, income realized is first placed into certain categories (such as interest, dividends, rent, sale of property, etc.). At times, an item of income may overlap into more than one possible category, in which case, specific IRS rules will likely clarify the proper classification. Once income is categorized, income source rules will then be applied in order to ascertain whether the income is U.S. or foreign-source. As a rule of thumb, income will be either U.S. or foreign-source depending upon where property is located, or where the income was realized, however there are many exceptions to this principle.

Income Source Examples

In this section, common income categories such as dividends, interest, personal services income, rents and royalties, and sales or exchanges of property, and their income sourcing rules will be briefly explained (other common income source rules not detailed here apply to software income, and transportation and communications income).

Dividends

Generally speaking, dividends received from U.S. (domestic) corporations are considered to be U.S.-source income. The fact that a domestic corporation may be distributing dividends derived from overseas operations usually will not matter for these purposes.

Conversely, dividends paid by a foreign corporation will generally be deemed foreign-source income. An important exception to this rule occurs in situations where a foreign corporation earns 25% or more of its gross income from income effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business for the three years immediately preceding the year of the dividend payment. In this case, that percentage of the dividend will be treated as U.S.-source income.

Interest

Interest income received from domestic corporations, the U.S. government and state governments, and non-corporate U.S. residents (among others) are deemed U.S.-source income.
There are some exceptions to this rule. For example, income will is deemed to be foreign-source if interest is received from a U.S. corporation which, over the prior three-year period, earned 80% or more of its active business income from foreign sources.

Personal services income

Personal services income includes such items as salaries, wages, fees, commissions. The location of where the services are performed will usually determine whether the personal services income is U.S. or foreign-source.

There are some exceptions to this general rule, including a limited commercial traveler exception for short business trips and de minimus amounts.

Rents and Royalties

For income received from the use of tangible property, the location of the property will determine its income sourcing. Other factors, such as where the property was manufactured, are not considered.

For income received for the use of intangible property (e.g. patents, copyrights, goodwill, etc.), in general, the location of where the property was used will determine its income sourcing.

Sale or Exchange of property

In general, the source of income relating to disposition of real property will depend upon the location of the property.

Broadly speaking, the sale of personal property (i.e, stocks, securities, equipment, inventory, intangible assets) will depend upon the residence of the seller. However, there are various exceptions to this rule. For example, if a item of purchased inventory is sold, the location of the sale will determine its income source.

Tax Treaty versus Regular Sourcing of Income Rules

Under certain circumstances, the sourcing source of an item of income or deduction could be changed by the provisions of a treaty. However, taxpayers claiming this benefit will need to file their tax return along with Form 8833.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office

This is a general overview of the taxation rules relating to sourcing of income. There are many other complex issues that may apply, depending upon the circumstances. Do you have questions concerning taxes relating to your international transactions or income? Sherayzen Law Office can assist you with these matters. Call (952) 500-8159 to set up a consultation today.

St Paul International Tax Lawyer: Hiring Questions

/in , /by

When you are about to hire a St Paul international tax lawyer to help you with an international tax issue, there are three fundamental questions that you need to ask him.

Hiring St Paul International Tax Lawyer Question #1:  How Will I Be Billed?

Generally, a St Paul international tax lawyer will bill you on an hourly basis, particularly in a tax litigation setting. He will provide you with a general estimate of your future expenses, which, understandably, will vary with the progress of the case. In a tax preparation or sometimes even in a simple tax planning case, a St Paul international tax lawyer may also offer a flat fee option. Where there are complex international tax planning issues involved, however, most St Paul international tax lawyers are likely to charge on an hourly basis. Similarly, while working on international tax compliance issues (Form 3520, 5471, 8891, et cetera) or preparing a tax return (including foreign tax credit and earned foreign income exclusion), St Paul international tax lawyers tend to rely on the hourly fee arrangements.

The more important issue with regard to this question is the manner in which you will be billed. Here, the practice varies among international tax lawyers in St Paul, Minnesota. Some St Paul international tax lawyers may require you to provide a large retainer which is later deposited in a client trust account; the withdrawals from the account are made in conjunction with the work completed and as spelled out in the retainer agreement between the lawyer and the client. If the retainer is later depleted, your St Paul international tax lawyer may ask you to replenish it. Other St Paul international tax lawyers will require a smaller retainer and will then bill you on a monthly basis. If the latter option is proposed by your St Paul international tax lawyer, you should ask for a sufficient time period (usually 10-14 days) to pay your bill. A mix of these options is also available. You will find that St. Paul international tax lawyers, especially solo practitioners, are rather flexible in their choice of the payment mode, but, once the fee agreement is signed, they will be firm in insisting that you comply with the terms of the agreement.

Hiring St Paul International Tax Lawyer Question #2: What percentage of the practice is devoted to the international tax law?

The purpose of this question is two-fold. First, you will figure out whether this St Paul international tax lawyer likes handling cases in your area of law. If a tax lawyer devotes more than 50% of his practice to international tax law, you know that he likes this area of law and will be enthusiastic about your case. This means that, in addition to his general due diligence obligations, this St Paul international tax lawyer will have a professional interest in your case. Second, generally, a St Paul international tax lawyer who devotes 50% or more of his practice to international tax law is likely to have good experience in this area.

Hiring St Paul International Tax Lawyer Question #3: will this St Paul international tax lawyer devote his personal attention to your case?

This question is very important, because you need to make sure that your lawyer personally works on your case. This becomes one of the biggest problems with hiring most mid-size and large law firms, because in those firms, the partner with whom you signed the agreement will generally delegate a large percentage (sometimes virtually all) of his responsibilities to his associates, who are generally less experienced in the area than the partner. In this case, you should insist that the St Paul international tax lawyer who signed the retainer agreement with you devotes his personal attention to your case and delegates only marginal matters to his associates. Generally, solo practitioners or small international firms do not have similar problems.

The other important issue involved in this question is whether your St Paul international tax lawyer is generally responsive to your calls and keeps you up-to-date with respect to the progress of your case. Most international tax lawyers are very busy people; yet, you must insist that you should be able to communicate with them. In my practice, I devote a great deal of energy and time to make sure that my clients do not feel neglected and have the latest information about their case available to them. For example, my firm has a rule of returning most calls before the end of the day.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Legal Help With Your International Tax Issues