taxation law services

St Paul International Tax Lawyer: Hiring Questions

/in , /by

When you are about to hire a St Paul international tax lawyer to help you with an international tax issue, there are three fundamental questions that you need to ask him.

Hiring St Paul International Tax Lawyer Question #1:  How Will I Be Billed?

Generally, a St Paul international tax lawyer will bill you on an hourly basis, particularly in a tax litigation setting. He will provide you with a general estimate of your future expenses, which, understandably, will vary with the progress of the case. In a tax preparation or sometimes even in a simple tax planning case, a St Paul international tax lawyer may also offer a flat fee option. Where there are complex international tax planning issues involved, however, most St Paul international tax lawyers are likely to charge on an hourly basis. Similarly, while working on international tax compliance issues (Form 3520, 5471, 8891, et cetera) or preparing a tax return (including foreign tax credit and earned foreign income exclusion), St Paul international tax lawyers tend to rely on the hourly fee arrangements.

The more important issue with regard to this question is the manner in which you will be billed. Here, the practice varies among international tax lawyers in St Paul, Minnesota. Some St Paul international tax lawyers may require you to provide a large retainer which is later deposited in a client trust account; the withdrawals from the account are made in conjunction with the work completed and as spelled out in the retainer agreement between the lawyer and the client. If the retainer is later depleted, your St Paul international tax lawyer may ask you to replenish it. Other St Paul international tax lawyers will require a smaller retainer and will then bill you on a monthly basis. If the latter option is proposed by your St Paul international tax lawyer, you should ask for a sufficient time period (usually 10-14 days) to pay your bill. A mix of these options is also available. You will find that St. Paul international tax lawyers, especially solo practitioners, are rather flexible in their choice of the payment mode, but, once the fee agreement is signed, they will be firm in insisting that you comply with the terms of the agreement.

Hiring St Paul International Tax Lawyer Question #2: What percentage of the practice is devoted to the international tax law?

The purpose of this question is two-fold. First, you will figure out whether this St Paul international tax lawyer likes handling cases in your area of law. If a tax lawyer devotes more than 50% of his practice to international tax law, you know that he likes this area of law and will be enthusiastic about your case. This means that, in addition to his general due diligence obligations, this St Paul international tax lawyer will have a professional interest in your case. Second, generally, a St Paul international tax lawyer who devotes 50% or more of his practice to international tax law is likely to have good experience in this area.

Hiring St Paul International Tax Lawyer Question #3: will this St Paul international tax lawyer devote his personal attention to your case?

This question is very important, because you need to make sure that your lawyer personally works on your case. This becomes one of the biggest problems with hiring most mid-size and large law firms, because in those firms, the partner with whom you signed the agreement will generally delegate a large percentage (sometimes virtually all) of his responsibilities to his associates, who are generally less experienced in the area than the partner. In this case, you should insist that the St Paul international tax lawyer who signed the retainer agreement with you devotes his personal attention to your case and delegates only marginal matters to his associates. Generally, solo practitioners or small international firms do not have similar problems.

The other important issue involved in this question is whether your St Paul international tax lawyer is generally responsive to your calls and keeps you up-to-date with respect to the progress of your case. Most international tax lawyers are very busy people; yet, you must insist that you should be able to communicate with them. In my practice, I devote a great deal of energy and time to make sure that my clients do not feel neglected and have the latest information about their case available to them. For example, my firm has a rule of returning most calls before the end of the day.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Legal Help With Your International Tax Issues

Tax Lawyer Minneapolis | Common Tax Penalties and Interest: The Basics

/in , , /by

Penalties and interest may be impose

d by the IRS relating to various tax underpayments. Taxpayers should understand some of the basic tax penalties detailed in this article (many of which can be quite sever) in order to avoid such penalties if possible, and to perhaps mitigate any imposed penalties.

Accuracy-Related Penalties

An accuracy-related penalty of 20% of a tax underpayment may be imposed by the IRS if the underpayment is attributable to one or more of the following: (1) negligence or disregard of the rules and regulations; (2) any substantial understatement of income tax; (3) any substantial valuation overstatement; (4) any substantial overstatement of pension liabilities; and/or
(5) any substantial gift or estate tax valuation understatement.

Late-Filing Penalty

If a taxpayer files a late tax return, unless he/she can demonstrate “reasonable cause” to the IRS for not filing on time, a late filing penalty of 5% of the net tax due for each month the return is due, up to five months (25% maximum) can be imposed. In addition, there is a minimum
penalty, equal to the lesser of $135 or the net amount required to be shown on the tax return, for returns that are more than 60 days late (including extensions).

The late filing penalty does not apply if a return is filed late but no taxes are owed.

Failure to Pay Penalty

In general, if a taxpayer is late in paying taxes owed, the IRS can impose a failure to pay penalty of 0.5% (0.5 of 1%) upon the net amount of tax due and unpaid by the due date. The penalty begins on April 16th, and stops accruing when the IRS receives the payment amount. The maximum penalty that can be imposed is 25%.

Combined Penalties

Taxpayers may also be subject to combined penalties, with special rules. For example, if both late-filing and late-payment penalties are imposed on a taxpayer, a combined penalty of 5% per month will be applied for the duration in which both penalties apply at the same time (maximum penalty of 25%). The combined penalty is made up of a reduced late-filing penalty (4.5% instead of the standard 5%) added to the 0.5% late-payment penalty. After the maximum 25% penalty is met, the late-filing portion of the penalty ends, but the late-payment portion will continue at 0.5% up to a maximum of 22.5%.

Other penalties may also be imposed in addition to the combined penalty.

Civil Fraud Penalties

If the IRS can establish by clear and convincing evidence that a taxpayer has fraudulently underreported income, it can impose a penalty equal to 75% of the entire amount underreported. After such determination, the burden of proof rests upon the taxpayer to establish that fraud did not constitute the entire underreported amount. Fraud is defined to be an intentional wrongdoing by the taxpayer with the specific intent to evade a tax known or believed to be owing.

Furthermore, if the IRS determines that a taxpayer fraudulently failed to file a tax return, a penalty equal to 15% of the net tax due for every month that a return is due and not filed, up to five months (for a maximum of 75%) can be imposed.

Interest on Tax Underpayments

In addition to the various penalties, interest on tax underpayments may also be imposed. For individual taxpayers, the interest rate is equal to the short-term Federal rate plus 3%. Interest is compounded daily in most cases, and begins to accrue from the due date of the return.

IRS Announces 2011 Standard Mileage Rates

/in , , , /by

On December 3, 2010, Internal Revenue Service issued the 2011 optional standard mileage rates used to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes.

Beginning on January 1, 2011, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be:

a) 51 cents per mile for business miles driven
b) 19 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes
c) 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations

A taxpayer may not use the business standard mileage rate for a vehicle after using any depreciation method under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) or after claiming a Section 179 deduction for that vehicle. In addition, the business standard mileage rate cannot be used for any vehicle used for hire or for more than four vehicles used simultaneously. Taxpayers also have the option of calculating the actual costs of using their vehicle rather than using the standard mileage rates.

Minneapolis Tax Lawyer | Tax Consequences of Selling a Structured Settlement

/in , , /by

Are your structured settlement payments taxable?

For federal income tax purposes, it is not relevant whether a plaintiff receives proceeds from a judgment or settlement. No matter how the result is reached, amounts received are characterized either as income, or are specifically excluded from income. Section 104 of the Internal Revenue Code generally excludes from gross income: amounts received as personal injury damage awards (to the extent that the damages are compensatory and not punitive); amounts received through accident or health insurance for personal injury or sickness; and amounts received as pension, annuity, or for personal injuries or sickness resulting from active service in the armed forces of any country. Punitive damages are almost always included in gross income. Essentially, judgments resulting from personal injury lawsuits and the like are meant to make a plaintiff whole and compensate them for something that they lost that was not income (e.g. loss of an arm), therefore any amount received in compensation of such an injury also must not be income.

If your settlement payments are not covered by Section 104, you need to determine if your structured settlement payments must be included in your income by considering the item that the settlement replaces. Business injury or non-personal injury judgments are generally regarded as gross income. Here are a few examples of judgments usually included in gross income: interest on any award; compensation for lost wages or lost profits in most cases; punitive damages (in most cases); pension rights (if you did not contribute to the plan); damages for patent or copyright infringement, breach of contract, or interference with business operations; and back pay and damages for emotional distress received to satisfy a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Structured periodic payments for business injury judgments or settlements should generally be included as income to the extent that the payments fit under the definition above. With respect to the personal injury plaintiffs, Section 104 explicitly excludes from gross income periodic payments that are otherwise excluded from gross income. Portions of periodic payments specifically labeled as interest may not be excluded from gross income. If properly structured, personal injury settlement payments can be tax free generally irrespective of the number of years the payments continue.

A note of caution, the analysis above is very general and simplistic, even with respect to the examples provided above. You should consult your tax attorney to determine whether your settlement should be included in gross income pursuant to Section 104.

What happens if you sell your right to structured settlement payments for a lump sum?

The information above is very important to an original beneficiary of a structured settlement who may be interested in selling their right to receive structured settlement payments. This is because Section 104 still controls characterization of any lump sum payment received in return for transferring the right to structured settlement payments. The end result is that any lump sum payment you receive from selling your structured settlement payments is likely to have the same tax treatment as the payments under the structured settlement.

Therefore, if the current structured settlement payments you receive are tax free, then the money you receive from selling your payments are likely to be tax free. Conversely, if the current structured settlement payments you receive are are likely to be included in your income, then the money you receive from selling your right to payments are also likely to be included in your income.

Again, the exact determination of whether the proceeds from the sale of a structured settlement need to be included in the gross income should be made by a tax attorney. Only a tax professional is likely to have the expertise necessary to take into account all factors of your particular tax situation and conduct correct legal analysis.

Are there tax consequences for the company purchasing the right to your structured settlement payments?

Section 5891 of the Internal Revenue Code was added in 2002 to protect structured settlement payees/recipients that decide to sell the right to their structured settlement payments. Section 5891 requires the sale of structured settlement payments must be approved by a qualified court order in accordance with the relevant state statute. In Minnesota, the applicable state statute is Minn. Stat. §549.31 (2010).

Section 549.31 requires among other things that: the transfer is not unlawful; the transferee discloses certain facts to the payee in writing; the payee has established that the transfer is in the best interests of the payee and the payee’s dependents; the payee has received independent professional advice regarding the legal, tax, and financial implications of the transfer; the transferee has given written notice of the transferee’s name, address, and taxpayer identification number to the annuity issuer and the structured settlement obligor and has filed a copy of the notice with the court or responsible administrative authority; and that the transfer agreement provides that any disputes between the parties will be governed, interpreted, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of Minnesota and that the domicile state of the payee is the proper place of venue to bring any cause of action arising out of a breach of the agreement. The transfer agreement must also provide that the parties agree to the jurisdiction of any court of competent jurisdiction located in Minnesota.

If a sale of the right to payment under a structured settlement does not comply with Section 5891, then Section 5891 imposes on any person who acquires directly or indirectly structured settlement payment rights in a structured settlement factoring transaction a 40-percent excise tax.

Conclusion

Tax consequences of selling a structured settlement should be analyzed by a tax professional who will be able to conduct proper legal analysis based on the particular facts of your case. Sherayzen Law Office can help you analyze your case and provide an independent advice on the legal and tax consequences of the sale.  Call us to discuss your case with an experienced Minneapolis tax lawyer!

Business Tax Lawyers | Certain End-of-Year Tax Deadlines and Reminders (2010)

/in , , /by

The following are some upcoming tax deadlines and reminders for the December of 2010. (This list may not include all applicable tax deadlines for your situation, and does not constitute tax advice; please, consult Sherayzen Law Office for more information and assistance with your tax planning needs.)

Selected General Deadline Reminders for Individuals: December 31, 2010

Traditional IRA to Roth IRA Conversion. Last date for taxpayers to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA for the tax year 2010 (provided a taxpayer meets the other applicable criteria).

Keogh plan deadline. Keogh plans must be established by the last date of the year (December 31, for calendar year basis taxpayers) in order for contributions to be deductible for the tax year 2010.

Capital Gains and Losses. Capital gains and losses for individual taxpayers are determined by the last trading date of the tax year. This is the case even though the settlement date (the date the shares-sold are actually exchanged and cash is received by the broker) may be several days later. Thus, even though the settlement date may occur in early 2011 for shares sold on the last trading date of 2010, the capital gains and/or losses will be established in 2010.

Short Sale Gains (But not Losses). Gains on shares sold short are also determined by trading date because of an IRS ruling treating the transaction as a constructive sale. Thus, shares sold short for gain on the last trading date of 2010 will be treated as capital gains for the tax year 2010, even though actual delivery of the shares may occur in 2011. Note, however, that for losses on shares sold short, the losses are not deductible until the shares are actually delivered to a broker. Taxpayers should plan accordingly if a loss is anticipated.

Marital Status. Taxpayers should note in general that marital status as of the last date of the year will determine the status for the entire tax year 2010.

General Tax Calendar Deadlines and Information (From IRS Publication 509)

December 10: Employees who work for tips. If you received $20 or more in tips during November, report them to your employer. You can use Form 4070.

December 15: Corporations. Deposit the fourth installment of estimated income tax for 2010. A worksheet, Form 1120-W, is available to help you estimate your tax for the year.

Selected Tax Deadlines for Employers Based on Monthly Deposit Rule

Social security, Medicare, and withheld income tax. If the monthly deposit rule applies, deposit the tax for payments in November by December 15, 2010.

Non-payroll withholding. If the monthly deposit rule applies, deposit the tax for payments in November by December 15, 2010.

Employer’s Tax Deadlines: Payroll Due Dates for Deposit of Taxes for 2010 Under the Semiweekly Rule

Nov 24-26: Dec 1
Nov 27-30: Dec 3
Dec 1-3: Dec 8
Dec 4-7: Dec 10
Dec 8-10: Dec 15
Dec 11-14: Dec 17
Dec 15-17: Dec 22
Dec 18-21: Dec 27
Dec 22-24: Dec 29
Dec 25-28: Jan 3
Dec 29-31: Jan 5

Excise Tax Deadlines

December 10: Communications and air transportation taxes under the alternative method. Deposit the tax included in amounts billed or tickets sold during the first 15 days of November.

December 14: Regular method taxes. Deposit the tax for the last 15 days of November.

December 28: Communications and air transportation taxes under the alternative method. Deposit the tax included in amounts billed or tickets sold during the last 15 days of November.

December 29: Regular method taxes. Deposit the tax for the first 15 days of December.

Have more questions about tax deadlines, or need help in planning for your year-end tax decisions? Call Sherayzen Law Office to discuss your tax situation with an experienced tax lawyer!