taxation law services

Failure to Conduct Voluntary Disclosure and Potential Penalties: 2013 Update

/in , , /by

Failure to conduct voluntary disclosure may mean heavy penalties for U.S. taxpayers are not in compliance with international tax laws established by U.S. government. In this article, I summarize some of the key penalties that such non-compliant U.S. taxpayers may face once the IRS finds them.

Penalties in General

In general, if the IRS verifies that a taxpayer failed to disclose his offshore financial accounts and foreign entities (and the income from these sources), the taxpayer may be subject to severe civil and criminal penalties. In addition to income-related accuracy related penalties, the IRS may also assess additional fraud-related penalties, FBAR penalties and foreign asset reporting penalties (with interest). Combined, all of these penalties and interest may exceed the actual value of nondisclosed assets and foreign bank accounts. In the worst-case scenario, a criminal prosecution may be initiated against such noncompliant taxpayers.

Finally, the voluntary disclosure process – which would otherwise be a far less painful way to deal with this problem – is automatically unavailable for taxpayers as soon as they are subject to IRS investigation.

Let’s discuss the penalties in more detail.

Accuracy-Related and Failure to File and Pay Penalties

An accuracy-related penalty on underpayments is imposed under IRC § 6662. Depending upon which component of the accuracy-related penalty is applicable, a taxpayer may be liable for a 20 percent or 40 percent penalty.

If a taxpayer fails to file the required income tax return, a failure to file (“FTF”) penalty may be imposed pursuant to IRC § 6651(a)(1). The penalty is generally five percent of the balance due, plus an additional five percent for each month or fraction thereof during which the failure continues may be imposed. The total penalty will not exceed 25 percent of the balance due.

If a taxpayer fails to pay the amount of tax shown on the return, a failure to pay (“FTP”) penalty may be imposed pursuant to IRC § 6651(a)(2). The penalty may be half of a percent of the amount of tax shown on the return, plus an additional half of a percent for each additional month or fraction thereof that the amount remains unpaid, not exceeding the total of 25 percent of the balance due.

Fraud Penalties

Fraud penalties may imposed under IRC §§ 6651(f) or 6663. Where an underpayment of tax, or a failure to file a tax return, is due to fraud, the taxpayer is liable for penalties that may essentially amount to 75 percent of the unpaid tax.

FBAR Penalties

The most severe civil penalties are likely to come from non-compliance with FinCEN Form 114 formerly Form TD F 90-22.1 (Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, commonly known as an “FBAR”) non-compliance. Generally, the civil penalty for willfully failing to file an FBAR can be as high as the greater of $100,000 or 50 percent of the total balance of the foreign account per violation (see 31 U.S.C. § 5321(a)(5)). Non-willful violations that the IRS determines were not due to reasonable cause are subject to a $10,000 penalty per violation. For more detailed discussion of the FBAR civil penalties, I refer you to this article.

Form 8938 Penalties

Form 8938 is a newcomer to the world of tax penalties. The Form was born out of the HIRE and came into existence only starting the tax year 2011. Generally, failure to file Form 8938 carries a penalty of $10,000; however, other additional penalties may be applicable (for more detailed discussion of Form 8938 penalties, please read this article).

Penalties for Failure to File Other Information Returns

In addition to these common penalties, additional penalties may apply depending on the particular circumstances of the non-compliant taxpayer. I will summarize a few key penalties here.

Form 5471

If the taxpayer belongs to one of the four categories of required filers of Form 5471 (Information Return of U.S. Persons with Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations) and he fails to do so, he generally faces a penalty of $10,000 for each return. For a more detailed discussion of Form 5471 penalties, review this article.

Form 8865

Where the taxpayer is required to file Form 8865 (Return of U.S. Persons With Respect to Certain Foreign Partnerships) and he fails to do so, the non-compliant taxpayer generally faces a $10,000 per each unfiled return with additional penalties possible. If the taxpayer transferred property to a controlled foreign partnership and he fails to file Form 8865, he faces additional penalties of 10 percent of the value of any transferred property; the penalty is limited to $100,000. Please, review this article for a more detailed discussion of Form 8865 penalties.

Other Common Information Returns

Depending on a taxpayer’s situation, he may face additional penalties for failure to file Forms 926, 3520, 3520-A, 5472 and other forms.

Criminal Prosecution

In the worst-case scenario, a criminal prosecution may be conducted by the IRS. Huge penalties and potential jail time are the possible in case of tax evasion.

Possible criminal charges related to tax returns include tax evasion (26 U.S.C. § 7201), filing a false return (26 U.S.C. § 7206(1)) and failure to file an income tax return (26 U.S.C. § 7203). Willfully failing to file an FBAR and willfully filing a false FBAR are both violations that are subject to criminal penalties under 31 U.S.C. § 5322 (see this article for discussion of the FBAR criminal penalties)

A person convicted of tax evasion is subject to a prison term of up to five years and a fine of up to $250,000. Filing a false return subjects a person to a prison term of up to three years and a fine of up to $250,000. A person who fails to file a tax return is subject to a prison term of up to one year and a fine of up to $100,000. Failing to file an FBAR subjects a person to a prison term of up to ten years and criminal penalties of up to $500,000.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help With Offshore Voluntary Disclosure

If you have undisclosed offshore accounts or foreign entities, contact Sherayzen Law Office for help as soon as possible. We are an international tax law firm that specializes in helping U.S. taxpayers in the United States and throughout the world to avoid the nightmare scenario and properly conduct disclosure of offshore assets, foreign bank accounts, foreign entities and unreported foreign income to the IRS.

If you believe that you may not be in full compliance with U.S. tax laws, the worst course of action is to do nothing and wait for the IRS to discover your noncompliance. Once this happens, your options are likely to be severely limited and the penalties a lot higher. Therefore, contact us so that we can help you with your international tax problems. Remember, all calls and e-mails are confidential.

2012 OVDP: Principal Purpose of the Program

/in , , /by

As 2012 OVDP (Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program) now closed enters its second tax season, it is important to review once again the reasons behind the existence of the program, what it offers to the IRS and how it may benefit currently non-compliant U.S. taxpayers.

Focus on International Tax Compliance

Since 2003, the IRS has conducted a number of voluntary disclosure programs for U.S. taxpayers with undisclosed foreign accounts or entities and undisclosed income. It is important to emphasize that these programs were not part of the traditional IRS voluntary disclosure program with respect to domestic income. The focus of each offshore voluntary disclosure program is on international tax compliance, particularly Report on Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (the “FBAR”) and other informational returns such as Forms 5471, 8865, 8868 and so on.

It is important to note that with each new program the rules are becoming more and more stringent as well as complex. The idea behind the tougher terms of each succeeding program is to reward early disclosure and induce taxpayers to enter a voluntary disclosure program as soon as possible.

2012 OVDP

The 2012 OVDP came into existence less than half a year after the tremendous success of the 2011 OVDI (which also came two years after a very profitable 2009 OVDP). It is obvious that the IRS considered the existence of such voluntary disclosure programs a vital part of its international tax compliance efforts.

As expected, 2012 OVDP came in with tougher terms (for example, the highest penalty category is 27.5% instead of 25% as it was under 2011 OVDI rules), closed some 2011 OVDI loopholes and created a more complex and detailed set of rules. However, 2012 OVDP also has some unique features.

The most prominent of these features is that there is no official end to the program – this is the very first time in the history of the voluntary disclosure programs. At the time, the IRS warned that it can end the program at any time, creating a great sense of uncertainty and urgency for the taxpayers who wish to enter the program.

Why the IRS Created the 2012 OVDP

The most obvious reason (and the most repeated one in various articles by commentators) for why the IRS wants a voluntary disclosure program like 2012 OVDP in place is money – these programs brought in billions of dollars to the U.S. treasury. While this is an important reason, I believe that the reasoning behind the 2012 OVDP is much more complex.

In addition to bringing more money to the cash-starved U.S. government and allowing people to become tax-compliant with the understanding that their penalties will be definite and limited, there are two other primary reasons behind the 2012 OVDP and all other similar voluntary disclosure programs. First, the voluntary disclosure programs have a tremendous collateral impact on the overall international tax compliance. The collateral effect is reflected not only in assuring that the persons who go through the voluntary disclosure are likely to continue to comply with U.S .tax laws in the future, but also in the tremendous publicity of the program and the U.S. tax laws.

However, the most curious collateral product of the 2012 OVDP is the fear that induces wider tax compliance and more entrees into the voluntary disclosure program. It seems paradoxical that a voluntary disclosure would create this apprehensive feeling, but it is very logical once you understand that this is not a fear of the 2012 OVDP itself, but the terror of seeing widespread compliance which singles out the non-compliant taxpayers more and more with each new OVDP participant.

The second reason behind the voluntary disclosure programs is information gathering. Each 2012 OVDP participant brings a treasure trove of information about where they keep their money, the level of complicity by foreign banks, the particular foreign and domestic advisors involved in promoting international tax non-compliance, and other valuable information. This information allows the IRS to establish the overall patterns of non-compliance (both geographic and with respect to particular individuals and organizations), identify the next investigation targets and amass evidence for future prosecutions.

IRS is currently sitting on a mountain of data and it is inevitable that this information will be used in the future against non-compliant U.S. taxpayers and their foreign advisors. Already in 2012, we observed aggressive IRS moves in Liechtenstein and Israel as well as engagement of over 50 jurisdictions around the world regarding FATCA compliance. My prediction is that this trend of expanded enforcement into other countries will continue in 2013 and will result in larger number of prosecutions.

What is the Benefit of 2012 OVDP for U.S. Taxpayers

The 2012 OVDP does not only benefit the IRS, but also certain U.S. taxpayers. The benefit is at least three-fold. First, for certain U.S. taxpayers 2012 OVDP is the only way to avoid tremendous penalties and criminal prosecution by the IRS. Equally important is the fact that a taxpayer enters the OVDP program with an ability to calculate(with reasonable degree of certainty) the total cost of resolving all offshore tax issues. However, the decision to enter the OVDP must be made after all of the facts are analyzed and the taxpayer is aware of the consequences of entering the 2012 OVDP.

Second, while generally very rigid, the 2012 OVDP program has a certain degree of flexibility built into its penalty structure. The number of penalty categories and the various rules of the program allow international tax attorneys to determine the best mode of the voluntary disclosure and develop the strategies to implement this particular voluntary disclosure scenario.

Finally, 2012 OVDP allows international tax attorneys to determine the alternative voluntary disclosure ways. For example, Q&A #17 officially supports the long-standing unofficial policy of the IRS that no FBAR penalties are likely if there is additional U.S. tax liability as a result of voluntary disclosure. Moreover, the very fact that 2012 OVDP delineates certain analytical categories places additional tools for strategy development in the hands of the attorneys who seek alternative ways of bringing U.S. taxpayers into full compliance with U.S. tax laws under the existing legal structure outside of the 2012 OVDP.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help with Voluntary Disclosure

If you have undisclosed foreign account or foreign entities, contact Sherayzen Law Office for help with your voluntary disclosure. Our experienced international tax firm will thoroughly analyze your case, assess your FBAR liability as well as other applicable penalties, identify the options available in your case, and work with you every step of the way until your voluntary disclosure is finished. We have helped taxpayers around the world to do various types of voluntary disclosures, including the official Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Programs and Initiatives.

FBAR Filing: FinCEN’s Third Extension for Certain Signatory Authority Filers

/in , /by

In FinCEN Notice 2012-2, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced a third extension of time for certain Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) filings in light of ongoing consideration of questions regarding the filing requirement and its application to individuals with signature authority over but no financial interest in certain types of accounts. The new extended deadline is set for June 30, 2014.

This extended filing deadline applies only to the following classes of individuals:

1). An employee or officer of a covered entity (see 31 C.F.R. § 1010.350(f)(2)(i)-(v)) who has signature or other authority over and no financial interest in a foreign financial account of another entity more than 50 percent owned, directly or indirectly, by the entity (a “controlled person”). For this purpose, a “controlled person” is a U.S. or foreign entity that is more than 50% owned (directly or indirectly) by an excepted entity.
2). An employee or officer of a controlled person of a covered entity (see 31 C.F.R. § 1010.350(f)(2)(i)-(v)) who has signature or other authority over and no financial interest in a foreign financial account of the entity or another controlled person of the entity.
3). An employee or officer of an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission who has signature or other authority over and no financial interest in a foreign financial account of persons that are not investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Notice that categories 1 and 2 do not apply to companies that are not publicly traded or not SEC-registrants.

This extension comes after a series of earlier extensions by FinCEN. On February 14, 2012, FinCEN issued Notice 2012-1 to extend the filing date for FinCEN Form 114 Formerly TD F 90-22.1, FBAR, for certain individuals with signature authority over but no financial interest in one or more foreign financial accounts to June 30, 2013. This Notice was preceded by two earlier extensions: on May 31, 2011, FinCEN issued Notice 2011-1 (revised on June 2, 2011) to extend to June 30, 2012, the due date for filing the FBAR for certain individuals with signature authority over but no financial interest in one or more foreign financial accounts, specifically individuals whose FBAR filing requirements may be affected by the signature authority filing exceptions in 31 CFR § 1010.350(f)(2)(i)-(v). On June 17, 2011, FinCEN issued Notice 2011-2 similarly extending the FBAR filing due date to June 30, 2012, for certain employees or officers of investment advisers registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission who have signature authority over but no financial interest in certain foreign financial accounts.

The extension contained in FinCEN Notice 2012-2 is the third filing extension for individuals with signature authority over but no financial interest in certain types of accounts. It covers not only the reporting of signature authority held by such persons for 2012, but also for all other years for which filing was previously extended to June 30, 2012, under FinCEN Notices 2011-1 and 2011-2.

It is important to note, however, that all other taxpayers who are required to file an FBAR must still do so by June 30, 2013.

IRS FY 2012 Performance Results

/in , /by

The IRS released the statement describing its performance in the Fiscal Year 2012. The general results continued last year’s trend.

In the enforcement area, audits of individuals topped 1 million for the sixth year in a row, with a 1.03% coverage rate out of all tax returns filed. Audits in the upper income ranges remained substantially higher than other categories.

With respect to businesses, the IRS increased examinations across all categories of business returns by more than 12% in FY 2012, with the largest increases coming in audits of flow-through entities, which include partnerships and Subchapter S corporations. The examination rate exceeded 20% for the largest corporations.

IRS enforcement was highly profitable for the U.S. government, especially in the area of voluntary disclosures (such as 2009 OVDP, 2011 OVDI and 2012 OVDP). The IRS collected more than $50 billion in enforcement revenue in FY 2012, the third year in a row topping that figure. However, the 2012 numbers were lower than 2010 and 2011, which were unusual years with enforcement dollars helped by large numbers of offshore tax cases coming in. More than 38,000 disclosures of offshore accounts have been made to date through the IRS’ offshore voluntary disclosure programs. In addition, the economic slowdown contributed to lower enforcement figures, as most enforcement dollars collected resulted from audits of returns for years during the slowdown.

In terms of staffing, however, the IRS again suffered from the cuts to its budget by the Congress, despite extensive evidence that investment in IRS enforcement brings disproportionate amount of income to U.S. government. After a nearly flat budget in FY 2011, the IRS’ FY 2012 budget was reduced by $305 million. This reduction affected the level of staffing available to deliver service and enforcement programs. Overall full-time staffing has declined by more than 8% over the last two years, and staffing for key enforcement occupations fell nearly 6% in the past year.

One exception to the staffing problems has been identify theft. In FY 2012, the IRS more than doubled the number of staff dedicated to preventing refund fraud and assisting taxpayers victimized by identity theft, with more than 3,000 employees working in this area. As a result of these increased efforts, the IRS in FY 2012 was able to prevent the issuance of more than 3 million fraudulent refunds worth more than $20 billion, an increase from approximately 1.8 million refunds worth about $14 billion the previous year.

On the service side, the IRS saw continued strong growth in electronic filing by individuals, as the e-filing rate in FY 2012 exceeded 80% for the first time. Taxpayer interest in online interactions continued to increase as well, with web page visits on IRS.gov up nearly 17% to 372 million.

One of the most surprising trends has been the steady increase in criminal investigations and the growth in the conviction rate. The number of criminal investigations for tax and tax-related matters has gone up from the low of 1,269 investigation in 2009 to 1,846 in 2012 – a whopping 45% increase. During the same time, the conviction rate went up from 87.2% in 2009 to 93.0% in 2012. This means that the IRS is not only radically increasing the number of criminal investigations, but also it is more successful in its prosecution efforts.

Overall, 2012 appears to have been a successful year for the IRS, especially with respect to international tax enforcement.

IRS Provides Penalty Relief to Farmers and Fishermen

/in , /by

On January 18, 2013, the IRS announced that it will issue guidance in the near future to provide relief from the estimated tax penalty for farmers and fishermen unable to file and pay their 2012 taxes by the March 1 deadline due to the delayed start for filing tax returns.

The delay stems from this month’s enactment of the American Taxpayer Relief Act (ATRA). The ATRA affected several tax forms that are often filed by farmers and fishermen, including the Form 4562, Depreciation and Amortization (Including Information on Listed Property). These forms will require extensive programming and testing of IRS systems, which will delay the IRS’s ability to accept and process these forms. The IRS is providing this relief because delays in the agency’s ability to accept and process these forms may affect the ability of many farmers and fishermen to file and pay their taxes by the March 1 deadline. The relief applies to all farmers and fishermen, not only those who must file late released forms.

Normally, farmers and fishermen who choose not to make quarterly estimated tax payments are not subject to a penalty if they file their returns and pay the full amount of tax due by March 1. Under the guidance to be issued, farmers or fishermen who miss the March 1 deadline will not be subject to the penalty if they file and pay by April 15, 2013. A taxpayer qualifies as a farmer or fisherman for tax-year 2012 if at least two-thirds of the taxpayer’s total gross income was from farming or fishing in either 2011 or 2012.

Farmers and fishermen requesting this penalty waiver must attach Form 2210-F to their tax return. The form can be submitted electronically or on paper. The taxpayer’s name and identifying number should be entered at the top of the form, the waiver box (Part I, Box A) should be checked, and the rest of the form should be left blank.