Posts

Office of Administrative Hearings: Sources of Procedure and Procedural Rights

/in , /by

If you appealed your business license denial and your case is pending effectively in the Office of Administrative Hearings, it is essential to understand the procedural rules of this administrative court as well as your procedural rights. This means that you and/or your attorney must have a good understanding of the sources of the administrative rules and procedural rights.

There are five main sources of the administrative procedure, including procedural rights, for the cases pending in the Office of Administrative Hearings. First, the Due Process Clause of the U.S. and Minnesota constitutions. Due process rights must be afforded to parties irrespective of whether they are explicitly mentioned in a relevant statute. The two most important rights include: a right to notice and a right to a hearing. A deep understanding of the due process clause may be required to mount an effective defense against the state’s claims or to support your arguments for approval of your business license application.

Second, Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act can be found in Chapter 14 of the Minnesota Annotated Statutes. It constitutes is an important source of the procedural rules for Minnesota state agencies, and, among other things, sets up the procedures for an agency’s rulemaking and applicant petitioning.

The most direct source of the OAH procedures are the rules of the Office of Administrative Hearings(OAH). The Rules can be found in Chapter 1400 of the Minnesota Administrative Rules. Knowledge of the rules is crucial for effective pre-hearing practice as well as the conduct of the actual hearing.

Fourth, a specific statute or an agency’s procedural rules may provide for the specific procedural rules and even substantive requirements.

Finally, where an agency or the OAH has not promulgated a rule to govern unanticipated circumstances, the administrative law judge is likely to rely on the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure. In fact, the OAH rules specifically mention the Rules of Civil Procedure as a guide for an administrative law judge in situations where the administrative rules are silent.

I have already detailed elsewhere (click here) the great importance of timely hiring an attorney to represent you in case of a business denial appeal. Here, I will just reiterate that hiring a business lawyer knowledgeable in the OAH rules and procedures is likely to save you nerves, time, money, and even determine the outcome of your case.

Sherayzen Law Office can help you every step of the way in your business license denial appeal case. We will make the utmost use of the pre-hearing process and will provide a vigorous and creative defense of your interests during the hearing.

Call NOW to schedule the consultation!

Net Worth Requirement for Money Transmitter License in Minnesota

/in , /by

An applicant for a money transmitter license in Minnesota must comply with Minn. Stat. §53B.05 net worth requirements. Under Minnesota law, each licensee engaging in money transmission in three or fewer locations in the state, either directly or through authorized delegates, must have a net worth of at least $25,000. However, if a licensee engages in money transmission at more than three locations in the state, but fewer than seven locations (either directly or through authorized delegates), he must have a net worth of at least $50,000. If there are more than six locations in the state, the licensee should have a net worth of $100,000 and an additional net worth of $50,000 for each location or authorized delegate located in the state in excess of seven, to a maximum of $500,000. The net worth is calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

The required net worth must be maintained throughout the licensed period. Failure to meet the statutory net worth requirement may lead to license revocation and denial of the license renewal application. Minn. Stat. §53B.19 (2).

The burden of proof is on the initial licensee. This means that when the applicant files its money transmitter license application for the very first time, he must prove by preponderance of evidence that he satisfies the net worth requirements and any other issues raised by the Minnesota Department of Commerce (“Department”). When an application for license renewal is filed, however, the issue of who bears the burden of proof is not yet settled by courts. There is a very good argument that the Department bears the burden of proof once the initial burden of production is satisfied by the applicant. Sherayzen Law Office can help you make this argument once the need arises.

It is very important to hire a Minnesota attorney to review your license application. The regulatory compliance costs are very high and making sure that your application satisfies the statutory requirements prior to its filing may be crucial to containing legal expenses and even ultimate ability to obtain (for the first time) or renew the license.

If, however, you submit your license application without professional review of a Minnesota attorney and the Department raises issues with respect to the application, it is indispensable to retain a Minnesota business lawyer as soon as possible. Timely professional intervention may lead to quick resolution of the issues and led to significant savings in accounting and legal expenses.

Sherayzen Law Office can help you file a new license application as well as a renewal application. If your application has been rejected and you appeal the case with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Sherayzen Law Office will provide you with a vigorous yet cost-effective legal representation. Call our office at (952) 500-8159!

Top 3 Reasons to Hire Attorney to Represent You in a Contested Hearing Conducted by the Office of Administrative Hearings

/4 Comments/in , /by

In this article, I will discuss three most important reasons for retaining a lawyer to represent you in a Contested Hearing conducted by the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH).

1. Contested Hearing conducted by the OAH is an Administrative Version of a Trial

Contested Hearing is an administrative trial. In most ways, it is highly similar to a regular civil trial, only with somewhat relaxed procedural and evidentiary rules. There is an administrative law judge and an attorney representing the other side. The rules of procedure and evidence, while more informal and less strict than in a usual trial, must be followed. Moreover, where the OAH does not provide for or omits certain procedures, the administrative judge will refer back directly to the civil court rules for the guidance.

Thus, you need to know the OAH rules. It is very easy to damage your case by making unnecessary procedural mistakes. Even where the mistakes are reversible, the image of your case may suffer.

2. Government Agencies are Represented by Attorneys

Government agencies realize the complexity and importance of the Contested Hearings. Hence, they are always represented by attorneys, often highly experienced and specialized in the relevant areas of law. Government lawyers are also well-versed in the procedural rules of the OAH.

Therefore, it is simply very difficult, if not impossible, for a business owner, who is not trained in law and inexperienced in the OAH procedures, to match the government’s combination of experience, knowledge, and skillful advocacy – even when the judge is lenient when it comes to procedural mistakes committed by the pro se litigators (i.e. business owners who choose to represent themselves).

3. Legal Fees are Often Lower than the Cost of Failure

An adverse ruling by the judge in a Contested Hearing may often put you out of business (for example, in a business license denial case). Even if your business is able to absorb the costs of the final outcome, the expenses associated with the provisions of the ruling may often be significantly higher than in a situation where an attorney’s timely intervention may have mitigated or averted altogether the worse terms of the judge’s decision.

Of course, hiring an attorney does not mean that you will automatically win your case. It does mean, however, that you will have a professional ardent advocate skilled in the art of law and procedure working solely to reach the most favorable outcome in your case. Even in a losing situation, your attorney may be able to find the least-damaging solution to your problem. Often, a lawyer may be able to settle the case even without the need to go to the hearing, avoiding the expenses associated with it.

Conclusion

While a Contest Hearing is not as full-blown civil trial, you should make sure that you are adequately represented during the hearing proceedings. There are procedures to follow, rules to know, and a formidable opponent to defend against. The stakes are usually sufficiently high to justify reasonable expenses on the legal representation.

Sherayzen Law Office can help you every step of the way in the pre-hearing process and it will provide vigorous and creative defense of your interests during the hearing. Call NOW at (952) 500-8159 to schedule the consultation!