Posts

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions | Minneapolis Minnesota International Tax Lawyer

/in , /by

In a previous article, I discussed in detail the Substantial Presence Test and I mentioned that there are a number of exceptions to the Test. This means that, even though a person met the requirements of the substantial presence test, he can still avoid the resident alien status for US income tax purposes based on a specific exception.  In this brief essay, I will summarize these Substantial Present Test exceptions.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Closer Connection

The first set of exceptions includes the Closer Connection Exception and the Tax Treaty Exception.  Let’s deal with each one separately.

Under the Closer Connection Exception, an individual who meets the requirements of the Substantial Presence Test is able to escape being a US tax resident for income tax purposes if he can demonstrate a “closer connection” to a foreign country.

In another article, I detail all of the requirements of the Closer Connection Exception.  Here I would like to restate the main requirements under IRC § 7701(b)(3)(B) and Treas. Reg. § 301.7701(b)-2(a):

1.The individual must be present in the United States for fewer than 183 days in the current calendar year;

2.The individual must maintain a tax home in a foreign country during the year;

3.The individual must have a closer connection to that foreign country than to the United States; and

4. An individual must be an eligible individual.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Tax Treaty Exception

The Tax Treaty Exception is very similar to the Closer Connection Exception, but it is based on a completely different concept – the tie-breaker rules of a tax treaty.

 IRC §7701(b)(6) and Treas. Reg. §301.7701(b)-7 provide that an individual who meets the substantial presence test but is a resident of a treaty country under a tie-breaker provision of an income tax treaty may elect to be treated as a nonresident alien for US income tax purposes. This individual will need to make an election on Form 8833, Treaty-Based Return Position Disclosure.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Eight Categories of Exempt Individuals

While the Closer Connection and the Tax Treaty Exceptions deal with someone who actually met the Substantial Presence Test and is trying to escape the its consequences, the second set of exceptions exempts the days spent in the United States from the consideration of the Substantial Presence Test so that the exempt individual never meets the Substantial Presence Test.  This is a very important distinction, because it may greatly affect one’s obligations concerning US international information returns.

Here is a list of categories of exempt persons:

Foreign government-related individuals and their immediate family (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(B))

Teachers and trainees and their immediate family (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(C))

Foreign students on F-, J-, M- or Q-visas (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(D))

Professional athletes temporarily in the US for charitable sporting events (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(A)(iv))

Individuals unable to leave the US due to medical conditions (26 USC §7701(b)(3)(D)(ii))

commuters from Canada and Mexico 26 USC §§7701(b)(7)(B)

foreign vessel crew members 7701(b)(7)(D) and

and persons who travel between two foreign countries with a less than a 24-hour layover in the United States 7701(b)(7)(C)

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Note on the Professional Athletes Exception

The “professional athletes who are temporarily present in the United States to compete in a charitable sporting event” category  has very specific requirements for the sport events in order for exemption to apply.  First, the sports event must be organized primarily to benefit §503(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Second, the net proceeds from the event must be contributed to the benefitted tax-exempt organization. Finally, the event must be carried out substantially by volunteers.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Note on the Medical Condition Exception

Concerning the last category “foreign aliens who are unable to leave the United States because of a medical condition”, Rev. Proc. 2020-20 expanded this medical condition exception to include “COVID-19 Medical Condition Travel Exception” for eligible individuals unable to leave United States during “COVID-19 Emergency Period”. The term COVID-19 Emergency Period is a single period of up to 60 consecutive calendar days selected by an individual starting on or after February 1, 2020 and on or before April 1, 2020 during which the individual is physically present in the United States on each day. An Eligible Individual may claim the COVID-19 Medical Condition Travel Exception in addition to, or instead of, claiming other exceptions from the substantial presence test for which the individual is eligible.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Eligibility is on Day-by-Day Basis

The eligibility for any particular exception is determined on a day-by-day basis. If an alien ceases to qualify for any of these exceptions because of a change in circumstances but remains in the United States, he must count the days present in the United States for the purposes of the substantial presence.  The count must start from the very day that he no longer qualifies for the exception.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Immediate Family

Immediate family can be derivatively eligible for a substantial present test exception only for the following categories: foreign government-related individual, a teacher or trainee (J-visa or Q-visa holder) and a student (F-visa or M-visa holder).  The family of the individuals in the other five categories may only claim an exception based on their own particular facts and circumstances.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help with US International Tax Law

US international tax law is incredibly complex.  This is why you need to contact Sherayzen Law Office for professional help.  Sherayzen Law Office is a highly-experienced leader in US international tax compliance that stands out for its ability to navigate complex international tax issues with creativity, precision and depth.

Contact Us Today to Schedule Your Confidential Consultation!

Saving Clause | International Tax Lawyer & Attorney Minneapolis

/in , /by

The Saving Clause is a provision that all US income tax treaties contain. In this brief essay, I will introduce the readers to the Saving Clause, its purpose and its effect.

Saving Clause vs. Savings Clause

The first thing to note is that the proper way to refer to this important tax treaty provision is “saving clause” and not “savings clause” (see, for example, 2016 US Model Income Tax Treaty, article 1(4)).  You will still see sometimes various articles and even tax provisions (for example, §7852(d)(2)) incorrectly use “savings clause”.

Saving Clause: Effect on US Citizens

The Saving Clause provides that the United States may tax its citizens as if the tax treaty were not in effect. Here is a common example of the clause from the US-Spain tax treaty: “Notwithstanding any provision of the Convention except paragraph 4, a Contracting State may tax its residents (as determined under Article 4 (Residence)), and by reason of citizenship may tax its citizens, as if the Convention had not come into effect” (italics added).

In other words, the Saving Clause prevents US citizens who are classified as income tax residents of the treaty country from claiming a different tax treatment that would otherwise be available under the treaty to noncitizens who are residents of the treaty country. For example, a US citizen cannot claim an exemption from certain income otherwise exempt for a noncitizen who is a resident of a treaty country.

Saving Clause: Effect on US Residents

The impact of the Saving Clause on US residents is more complicated.  The Clause usually provides that the United States may tax its residents as determined by a treaty (usually in an Article 4) as if the treaty were not in effect.  Usually, these resident provisions would contain tie-breaker rules. This would mean that an individual who is a resident alien under §7701(b) but a resident of the treaty country under the treaty, then the saving clause cannot deny the individual any of the exemptions from US tax law or reductions in US tax that are provided by the treaty to residents of the treaty country. In such cases, the saving clause would have limited impact on residents.

If, however, a tax treaty does not contain the tie-breaker provisions in its definition of a tax resident (as some old treaties), then the impact of the Saving Clause may be tremendous and even dispositive. In this situation, the Saving Clause assures that an individual who is, at the same time, a resident alien under the Internal Revenue Code IRC) provisions and a resident of the treaty country under the treaty country’s laws will still be taxed as a US resident alien irrespective of the tax treaty.

Saving Clause: Worldwide Income Reporting and Foreign Asset Disclosure Requirements

The application of the Saving Clause may have tremendous impact on an individual’s US tax obligations.  First of all, I remind the readers that, absent treaty limitations, all US tax residents are taxed on their worldwide income. This is the rule irrespective of whether the income is earned, whether it is repatriated to the United States and whether it is subject to foreign tax withholding.

Moreover, US Persons may also be subject to multiple US information return reporting requirements, including FBAR, Form 8938, Form 5471, et cetera.  In this context, it is important to remember that the definition of a “US Person” is broader than the definition of a “resident” for income tax purposes. In other words, a person may be a nonresident for tax purposes due to a tax treaty provision, but he will still be a US Person for the purposes of filing an FBAR or another US information tax return.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help with Your US International Tax Compliance

If you are a US tax resident or a US person, you may be subject to highly complex US international tax requirements.  In order to ensure your full compliance with US international tax provisions, contact Sherayzen Law Office for professional help.

Since 2005, Sherayzen Law Office has helped hundreds of US taxpayers to resolve their prior US tax noncompliance and assure their continuous compliance with US international tax laws.  We have extensive experience with all major US tax compliance requirements such as: worldwide income tax compliance, FBAR, Form 926, Form 3520, Form 3520-A, Form 5471, Form 8621, Form 8865, FATCA Form 8938, et cetera. We can help you!

Contact Us Today to Schedule Your Confidential Consultation!

IRS Wins Against Wells Fargo’s Tax Shelter Scheme | Int’l Tax Lawyers MN

/0 Comments/in , /by

On May 25, 2017, the IRS sealed another victory against the infamous abusive tax shelter known as STARS (Structured Trust Advantaged Repackaged Securities).

The actual victory occurred on November 17, 2016, when a jury in Minnesota found Wells Fargo guilty of engaging in abusive tax shelter and determined that Wells Fargo was not entitled to a about $350 million of foreign tax credits. On May 25, 2017, however, the IRS expanded that victory when the Minnesota federal district court found Wells Fargo liable for a 20 percent negligence penalty.

Wells Fargo’s Tax Shelter Scheme can be traced to Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”). Barclays marketed the STARS transaction to American banks, including Wells Fargo. STARS was designed to exploit differences between the tax laws in the United States and in the United Kingdom.

Wells Fargo’s Tax Shelter Scheme is not the first one to be rejected by courts. In fact, at this point, three other cases have rejected the STARS tax shelters similar to Wells Fargo’s Tax Shelter Scheme. These case are: Bank of New York, BB&T Bank and Santander Bank purchased. Santander Holdings USA, Inc. v. United States, 844 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 2016), pet. for cert. filed, March 20, 2017 (No. 16 1130); Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp. v. Comm’r, 801 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 1377 (2016); Salem Fin., Inc. v. United States, 786 F.3d 932 (Fed. Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 1366 (2016).

The recent victory by the IRS against Wells Fargo’s Tax Shelter Scheme is an important reminder of the salience of the business purpose doctrine in US international tax law. Sherayzen Law Office has previously written on the doctrine and emphasized how crucial it is to distinguish legitimate tax planning from engaging in abusive tax shelters.

Sherayzen Law Office advocates an approach that emphasizes legitimate tax planning that allows US taxpayers to utilize the advantages offered by US tax laws without engaging in abusive tax schemes, like STARS.