Debunking the Separation Myth | US International Tax Lawyer Alvarado Veracruz Mexico

/in /by

Hello and welcome to Sherayzen Law Office video blog. My name is Eugene Sherayzen and I’m an international tax attorney and owner of Sherayzen Law Office, Ltd.

Today, I’m continuing my series of vlogs from Alvarado, Mexico and in this vlog I’d like to focus on what I call the separation myth. Basically a belief that if you reside, that you only need to report income in the jurisdiction where it was earned and only in that jurisdiction; that’s why it’s a separation myth. Basically, you separate your income by jurisdiction where it was earned and reported only in that jurisdiction.

This is a very common myth. I receive clients every single month who believe in this myth; actually, I have already lost count of how many people have come to me and said “Oh, you know what? I thought that everything that I had in Mexico is really only relevant to Mexico and everything we have in the United States is only relevant to the United States”. Or “Everything we have in Thailand is only relevant to Thailand and everything in the United States is only relevant to the United States”. “Everything in France is relevant only to France and everything I earn in the United States is only relevant to the United States” and “I’ve always disclosed my US-sourced income on my US tax returns and my foreign income either was not disclosed at all anywhere because it was not required to be so or it was disclosed on local tax returns”.

This myth is completely wrong. If you are a US person; if you are a US tax resident to be more exact, then you must disclose your worldwide income on your US tax returns. It’s not a matter of choice, it’s an obligation and it is absolute.

The only exceptions, and there are few, are contained in some tax treaties, most commonly in the US-France tax treaty. Otherwise, the income must be disclosed on US tax returns if you are a US tax resident.

Be careful and do not fall victim to this myth. In the next vlog, I will continue debunking common myths concerning US tax compliance.

Thank you for watching, until the next time.

Santander Bank Polish PFIC Investments | International Tax Lawyers Chicago Illinois

/in /by

Hello and welcome to Sherayzen Law Office video blog. My name is Eugene Sherayzen and I’m an international tax attorney and owner of Sherayzen Law Office, Ltd.

Today, I’m continuing a series of blogs from Chicago, Illinois. Today I would like to discuss a difficult but very interesing subject of PFIC compliance concerning Polish investments. In particular, (I mean) those very popular former WBK bank (now it’s Santander Bank) investments in Polish mutual funds.

These investments are considered to be PFICs for US international tax compliance purposes. PFICs – Passive Foreign Investment Companies have very special and very unfavorable treatment in US international tax law. If you are a US Person who is doing these types of investments, you should be very careful because these investments have to be worth it. Why? PFIC tax compliance could cost you more than a potential gain that you can get from those PFIC investments, especially if we’re talking about small investments. The trouble that they can bring you could be enormous.

Not only are those investments reportable on FBAR and Form 8938 but you also have to consider the fact that you could/would be paying potentially tax at the highest marginal rate in existence on income related to gains from foreign mutual funds.

If you have any of these former WBK bank investments (now Santander bank investments) in Polish mutual funds you should contact me at (952) 500-8159 or email me at: [email protected]

Thank you for watching, until the next time.

Chicago International Tax Lawyer | Reporting of Polish Income Paid in Poland on US Tax Returns

/in /by

Hello and welcome to Sherayzen Law Office video blog. My name is Eugene Sherayzen and I’m an international tax attorney and owner of Sherayzen Law Office, Ltd.

I’m continuing my series of blogs from Chicago, Illinois, United States. Today, I’d like to talk about something that I mentioned in the very first blog from this city and this is the fact that there is a very large Polish speaking community here in Chicago. Polish is still the second most spoken language among immigrant groups here in Chicago after Spanish. But since I’ve started many topics concerning Latin America in my blog from Mexico City, I wanted to focus today on the discussion of Polish-related issues, particularly income tax reporting concerning Polish-source income.

The reason why I thought about this topic is because I recall I had client from Chicago whose mother runs a successful busines in Poland and in order to reduce her Polish taxes, she would pay a salary to her daugher but her daughter never reported the Polish-source income, that is never until she came to know about the worldwide income reporting requirement. This is precisely what I wanted to emphasize in this blog:

Just because an income is paid in Poland to a Polish account of a US person, this income, and if this income is never brought into the United States, this will not be enough for this income not to be taxed in the United States.

The worldwide income reporting requirement applies irrespective of whether the income ( the foreign-source income) is ever brought into the United States.

Thank you for watching, until the next time.