Minnesota Tax Attorneys: Corporate Deadlines on March 17, 2014

/in , /by

Minnesota tax attorneys and attorneys in other states warn their clients that there are two important IRS deadlines next Monday, March 17, 2014.

First, corporate income tax returns are due for corporations with fiscal year ending on December 31, 2013. Normally, the deadline would be on March 15, but because this date falls on Saturday, the deadline in 2014 is March 17.

If you are not ready to file corporate income tax return, you can request an extension using Form 7004 for an additional six months until September 15, 2014. Note, if you file an extension, you still must pay the corporate taxes due by March 17, 2014 (in such a case, Minnesota tax attorneys estimate the final tax liability of the corporation for 2013 and ask their corporate clients to pay the amount due with extension). As Minnesota tax attorneys advise, in most cases, EFTPS system should be used by the corporations to make such a payment.

Minnesota tax attorneys also warn about a second important deadline on March 17 ,2014. This deadline concerns the Subchapter S election for the corporations with tax years ending on December 31, 2013. The corporation can make such an election no later than two months and fifteen days after the beginning of the tax year in which the election is to take place. Again, since March 15 is Saturday, the deadline for this election is moved to March 17, 2014.

Whether your corporation may benefit from becoming an S-corporation is a question that depends on your particular facts. In such case, Minnesota tax attorneys weigh in multiple consideration, legal and tax, before giving an advice to their corporation clients.

Of course, corporations with fiscal years ending on a date other than December 31, 2013, have their own deadlines, but the rule behind calculating the deadlines in such cases are similar. Therefore, you should contact your Minnesota tax attorney to determine the exact due date of the income tax return of your corporation.

Canada FATCA: Canada Agrees to Implement FATCA

/in , /by

On February 5, 2014, the U.S. Department of the Treasury announced that the United States signed an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with Canada to implement the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). Since Treasury last announced multiple IGA signings in mid-December 2013, agreements have also been signed with Italy and Mauritius, the latter of which also signed a new tax information exchange agreement.

Congress enacted FATCA in 2010 to target non-compliance by U.S. taxpayers using foreign accounts, and the provision has since become the global standard for promoting tax transparency. As of February 5, 2014, the United States had signed 22 IGAs and had 12 agreements in substance.  Canada FATCA Agreement is one of the most recent IGAs to be signed.

In general, FATCA seeks to obtain information on accounts held by U.S. taxpayers in other countries. It requires U.S. financial institutions to withhold a portion of certain payments made to foreign financial institutions (FFIs) who do not agree to identify and report information on U.S. account holders. Governments have the option of permitting their FFIs to enter into agreements directly with the IRS to comply with FATCA under U.S. Treasury Regulations or to implement FATCA by entering into one of two alternative Model IGAs with the United States.

Canada FATCA: Model 1 IGA Signed by Canada

Canada FATCA implementation agreement is classified as Model 1 IGA. Under the Canada FATCA implementation agreement, FFIs will report the information required under FATCA about U.S. accounts to Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) , which in turn will report the information (as required by the Canada FATCA IGA) to the IRS.

Canada FATCA: US Taxpayers with Undisclosed Canadian Bank and Financial Accounts Are in Danger

What do these Canada FATCA developments mean for US taxpayers with undisclosed Canadian Bank and Financial Accounts? It means that all of these accounts are likely to be disclosed by the Canadian banks to the IRS, and these taxpayers have very little time to act.

If the IRS finds out about these undisclosed accounts, these U.S. taxpayers may face draconian willful civil and even criminal FBAR penalties.

This means that the owners of undisclosed Canadian accounts should consult an international tax expert in undisclosed foreign accounts as soon as possible.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help with the Voluntary Disclosure of Your Canadian Bank and Financial Accounts

If you have undisclosed financial accounts in Canada, contact Sherayzen Law Office as soon as possible to schedule a consultation. Our law firm has experienced expertise in voluntary disclosure of undisclosed foreign accounts and foreign assets. We have helped U.S. taxpayers around the world to bring themselves back into US tax compliance, while minimizing their tax and FBAR penalty exposure. Call or email us NOW!

OVDP International Tax Lawyer: Swiss Cantonal Banks Enter US Program for Banks

/in , /by

As an OVDP International Tax Lawyer, I continue to point out the centrality of the current U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) The Program for Non-Prosecution Agreements or Non-Target Letters for Swiss Banks (the “Program”) to the global international tax compliance efforts of the United States. As previous explained, the Program basically operates as a voluntary disclosure program for Swiss banks, similar to the US Internal Revenue Service’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (“OVDP”) for U.S. taxpayers holding undisclosed offshore accounts. The DOJ promises that, in return for providing disclosure of the accounts held by U.S. taxpayers and, in some case, paying various penalties, the qualifying Swiss banks can avoid U.S. criminal prosecution.

Cantonal Swiss Banks deserve a special attention from U.S. taxpayers precisely because they tend to be smaller, more involved in local life and (prior to the Program) would have been least likely to be concerned with the U.S. tax compliance. Yet, as it is explained below, these Swiss banks are actively participating in the Program. U.S taxpayers with undisclosed accounts in Switzerland are now faced with an even more immediate impact on their U.S. tax compliance. It is very important that they seek advice from an experienced OVDP International Tax Lawyer found at Sherayzen Law Office.

OVDP International Tax Lawyer: Switzerland Cantonal Banks Enter the Program

According to recent news reports, half of Switzerland’s publicly-backed cantonal banks (which are either majority or entirely-owned by the Swiss cantons) have announced they will join the Program. In general, many of these banks are protected by a full state guarantee (each respective canton has a subsidiary responsibility its bank’s liabilities). Switzerland has twenty-four cantonal banks in total, serving Switzerland’s twenty-six cantons. As of the end of 2013, the following cantonal banks have stated they will enter the Program:

Aargau (Aargauische Kantonalbank) (AKB)
Appenzell (Appenzeller Kantonalbank) (APPKB)
Geneva (Banque Cantonale de Geneve (BCGE)
Glarus (Glarner Kantonalbank) (GLKB)
Graubünden (Graubundner Kantonalbank) (GKB)
Lucerne (Luzerner Kantonalbank) (LUKB)
Nidwalden (Nidwaldner Kantonabank) (NWKB)
Obwalden (Obwaldner Kantonalbank (OWKB)
Schwyz (Schwyzer Kantonalbank) (SZKB)
St. Gallen (St. Galler Kantonalbank) (SGKB), along with its subsidiaries Hyposwiss Privatbank Zurich AG and Hyposwiss Private Bank Geneve SA)
Vaud (Banque Cantonale Vaudoise (BCV), along with its subsidiary Piquet Galland & Cie SA)
Zug (Zuger Kantonalbank) (ZugerKB)

At least eight of twelve cantonal banks have opted to apply under “Category 2” for Swiss banks likely to accounts held by US persons (see here for more information about this category), which could result in substantial fines, but absolve bank officials from criminal liabilities. Zuger Kantonalbank, for example, stated that it would apply under this category even though it claimed it did not actively seek US customers.

As of the end of 2013, four cantonal banks stated that will enroll in the Program under Category 4 for essentially local Swiss banks that are unlikely to have assets consisting of undeclared U.S.-taxpayer accounts. Swiss banks applying under Category 3 or 4 have a limited time available between July-October, 2014 in which to notify the US as to whether they will enter the Program.

OVDP International Tax Lawyer: Two Cantonal Banks Excluded from the Program

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) previously launched investigations against two other Swiss cantonal banks, such as Basler Kantonalbank (Basel) and Zürcher Kantonalbank (Zurich). These banks are classified as Category 1 banks and will not be allowed to enroll in the Program.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Legal Help with Undisclosed Swiss Accounts

U.S. taxpayers who either hold or previously held undisclosed bank accounts at any of the Swiss cantonal banks eligible for enrollment in the Program, or any bank already under investigation, are advised to seek competent and experienced legal assistance. U.S. taxpayers will likely face substantial civil and potential criminal penalties if they continue to hold undisclosed accounts or if their cases are not handled properly. At Sherayzen Law Office, PLLC, we can help with your all of your voluntary disclosure issues.

Foreign Partnership Tax Attorneys: Filing Form 8865 Schedule O (Part I)

/in , /by

Foreign Partnership Tax Attorneys should point out to their clients that Form 8865 should be used by US taxpayers to report the information required under IRC section 6038 (reporting regarding controlled foreign partnerships), section 6038B (reporting of transfers made to foreign partnerships), and/or section 6046A (reporting of acquisitions, dispositions, and changes in foreign partnership interests).

This article will explain the basics of Part I (“Transfers Reportable Under Section 6038B”) for Schedule O– “Transfer of Property to a Foreign Partnership”, an additional form submitted with Form 8865 that must be completed by certain categories of taxpayers. This article is not intended to convey tax or legal advice. US-International partnership taxation can involve many complex tax and legal issues, so you are advised to seek an experienced attorney in these matters. Sherayzen Law Office, Ltd. can assist you in all of your tax and legal needs, and help you avoid making costly mistakes.

Foreign Partnership Tax Attorneys: Who Must File Schedule O?

Schedule O is typically required to be filed by Category 3 filers under the Form 8865 instructions. In general, Category 3 filers are US persons who contributed property during their tax year to a foreign partnership in exchange for a partnership interest in the partnership (a section 721 transfer), if such persons either owned (directly or constructively) at least a 10% interest in the foreign partnership immediately after the contribution, or if value of the property contributed, when added to the value of any other property contributed to the partnership by such persons (including related persons), during the 12-month period ending on the date of the contribution is greater than $100,000.

Note, this is a general summary of Category 3 filers, and does not include all possibilities. It is very important to consult a foreign partnership tax attorney for help. Please see the instructions or contact Sherayzen Law Office for further details.

Foreign Partnership Tax Attorneys: Schedule O, Part I (“Transfers Reportable Under Section 6038B”)

Part I of Schedule O is used to report the contribution of property to a foreign partnership. In column (a), taxpayers must fill out the date of the property transfer (and if the transfer consisted of multiple transactions over a number of dates, the date the transfer was completed, would be entered). In Column (b), taxpayers list the number of items of property contributed, and in column (c), the fair market value of the property transferred, as of the date of the transfer, must be specified. Column (d) needs to be completed to detail the contributed property’s adjusted basis as of the date of transfer.

If appreciated property was contributed by a taxpayer, column (e) must be filled out, and the method (traditional, traditional with curative allocations, or remedial) used by the foreign partnership to make section 704(c) allocations with respect to each item of property must be specified (see Regulations section 1.704-3(b), (c), and (d) for more information). Also note that the instructions require that if appreciated property or intangible property is contributed, taxpayers must, “[P]rovide the information required in columns (a) through (g) separately with respect to each item of property transferred (except to the extent you are allowed to aggregate the property under Regulations sections 1.704-3(e)(2), (3), and (4)).” If gain was recognized by the taxpayer on the contribution of property, then column (f) must be completed. In Column (g), taxpayers need to state their percentage interest in the foreign partnership immediately after the property transfer (see the instructions for further information about specific types of percentage interest).

Finally, taxpayers may need to provide supplemental information, if required. Further, if property was contributed to a foreign partnership as part of a broader transaction, information about the transaction should be described.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help With Foreign Partnership Compliance

If you have an ownership interest in a foreign partnership, please contact Sherayzen Law Office for help. Our experienced foreign partnership tax law firm will thoroughly review the facts and circumstances of your case, properly prepare all of the required tax compliance documents and offer further planning with respect to U.S. taxes.

New Deduction Phase-outs for 2013 Tax Returns

/in , /by

Upper-income US taxpayers should be aware that new deduction phase-out IRS rules in effect for 2013 tax returns to be filed in 2014 may increase their tax liabilities or reduce refunds. Two new important changes for high-earning individuals or couples are the new itemized deduction phase-outs and personal and dependent exemption deduction phase-outs. Because of these changes in the deduction phase-out rules, along with other new IRS rules that we have covered in previous articles, the necessity for proper tax planning will only increase in future years.

This article will briefly explain the changes in the deduction phase-out rules; it is not intended to convey tax or legal advice. Please consult a tax attorney if you have further questions. Sherayzen Law Office, PLLC can assist you in all of your tax and legal needs.

New Itemized Deduction Phase-Out Changes

Under the new US tax rules, the amount of itemized deductions that high-earning individuals or couples may take on Form 1040 is subject to a phase-out limitation. Specifically, allowable itemized deductions will be reduced by 3% of the amount of adjusted gross income (AGI) above the certain income thresholds (however, this reduction will not exceed 80% of the original total amount of a taxpayer’s itemized deductions).

The income thresholds are the following: $250,000 for single individuals, $300,000 for married filing jointly couples, $150,000 for married filing separately couples, and $275,000 for heads of households. As an example, consider a married couple filing jointly with AGI of $500,000, and $50,000 of original itemized deductions for Schedule A. Because their AGI is $200,000 over the income threshold, their allowable itemized deductions will be reduced by 3% of the excess ($200,000 multiplied by 3%, equaling $6,000). Thus, their allowable itemized deductions will be reduced to $44,000.

New Personal and Dependent Exemption Deduction Phase-Out Changes

While under the general IRS rule, the amount that taxpayers may deduct for each applicable exemption increased from 2012 (at $3,800) to 2013 (now $3,900), certain taxpayers may lose some or all of the benefit of their exemptions if their AGI exceeds certain thresholds under the new Personal Exemption Phase-out (PEP). Under this rule, the dollar amount of each personal exemption must be reduced from its original value by 2 percent for each $2,500 or part of $2,500 ($1,250 for married filing separately) that AGI is above the above specified income thresholds.
For 2013 tax year returns, the phase-out starts at the following amounts: $250,000 for single individuals, $300,000 for married filing-jointly couples and qualifying widowers, $150,000 for married filing separately returns, and $275,000 for heads of households. If taxpayer’s AGI exceeds these applicable amounts by more than $122,500 ($61,250 for married filing separately returns), their deductions for exemptions amount will be reduced to zero.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help With Your Tax and Estate Planning

Combined with the new 3.8% Medicare surtax on investment income and the new 0.9% Medicare surtax on salaries and self-employment income earned by certain high-earning individuals, and the increased threshold amount for Schedule A itemized medical expense deductions, the new phase-out rules detailed in this article will dramatically impact many taxpayers. Professional tax planning may help lower your future tax liabilities.

This is why you need to contact the experienced tax law firm of Sherayzen Law Office to help you create a thorough tax plan aimed at taking advantages of the various provisions of the U.S. tax code.