Final Regulations and Guidance Issued on Reporting Interest Paid to Nonresident Aliens under FATCA

/in , /by

The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), was enacted in 2010 as part of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act, and mandates new reporting requirements, and amends existing IRC Sections.  Recently, the IRS issued final regulations and guidance regarding the reporting interest paid to nonresident aliens by certain financial institutions, as well as revenue procedure specifying foreign countries with which the U.S. has a information exchange agreement.  Nonresident aliens should be especially aware of these new rules, as many individuals will likely be affected by these rules.

TD 9584 (Guidance on Reporting Interest Paid to Nonresident Aliens), effective April 19, 2012, has the final regulations concerning the reporting requirements for commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions, securities brokerages, and insurance companies that pay interest on deposits.

In general, beginning with interest payments made on, or after, January 1, 2013, covered financial institutions will be required to report deposit interest paid to certain nonresident alien individuals.  The IRS may then exchange information relating to tax enforcement with the officials of foreign countries.  Under the new Treas. Reg. §§ 1.6049-4(b)(5) and 1.6049-8(a), interest paid to nonresident aliens must be reported if the amount in aggregate is $10 or more.

The IRS views this ability to share such information as important to its goal of gathering information from other jurisdictions about US taxpayers who may be evading US tax by hiding assets offshore.  Additionally, the IRS enacted the new reporting requirements to limit US taxpayers with US deposit accounts from falsely claiming to be nonresident aliens in order to avoid paying US taxes on interest they receive from deposits.

Taxation of Prizes and Awards

/in , /by

A lot of taxpayers are still unaware that awards and prizes may be potentially subject to U.S. federal income taxation.

In general, prizes and awards (other than certain types of fellowship grants and scholarships) should be included in gross income and subject to federal taxation.

Awards for religious, charitable, scientific, educational, artistic, literary or civic achievement are excluded from gross income only if the award is transferred unused by the payor to a governmental unit or a tax-exempt organization (charitable, religious, or educational) designed by the recipient.

The recipient of the award must be selected for the contest or proceeding without any of his action (or any action on his behalf).  Moreover, the recipient cannot be required to render substantial future services as a condition to receiving the prize or award.

Employee achievement awards are excludable from gross income only to the extent that the cost of the award is deductible by the employer.  It is important the awards do not represent disguised compensation.  The amounts subject to exclusion from gross income cannot be more than $400 for non-qualified awards and $1,600 for qualified awards (see IRC Sections 74 and 274(j) for further details).

Taxation of Restricted Stock Units

/in , /by

Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) have become prominent in the news recently as a result of the Facebook IPO. Many of Facebook’s employees received RSUs in addition to their wages, and will soon be paying a heavy tax bill. Facebook has estimated that its employees’ total tax liability will be approximately $4 Billion dollars. In fact, many startup companies, especially tech companies, are turning towards RSUs to reward their employees. Therefore, if you are an employee of such a company, you may want to read about the basics of RSUs, and how they are taxed in this article.

RSUs

In general, RSUs differ from traditional stock options in that RSUs are only transferred when the certain conditions are met, and the shares have vested. Whereas stock options may be taxed when a holder exercises or sells the options, RSUs are taxable (as explained below) once they vest. This means of course, that employees may face a significant tax once the RSUs vest, even if they haven’t actually sold a single share of the stock.

Taxation of RSUs

Once RSUs initially vest, the shares are not eligible to be treated as capital gains under the Internal Revenue Code. Instead, RSUs are treated as compensation, to be taxed as ordinary income. Additionally, no section 83(b) election will be available.

The amount of ordinary income to be reported is the fair market value price of the stock as of the vesting date times the numbers of shares vested, minus the original purchase or exercise price, if any. Additionally, because of the treatment of the vesting of RSUs as compensation income, withholding taxes may also apply. For US employees, this means that Federal and any applicable state taxes, as well as Social Security and Medicare taxes, will be withheld (special rules may apply for non-US taxpayers, depending upon foreign taxation regimes).

Once a shareholder does sell the stock after the vesting date, capital gain or loss treatment will then be available. The capital gain or loss will be the difference between the fair market price on the date of vesting and the final sales price of the stock.

RSUs and US Employees of Foreign Subsidiaries

US taxpayers working abroad for foreign subsidiaries of U.S.-based multinational companies face special obstacles. Unfortunately, in the past, despite having large compliance departments, some companies failed to fully comply with the RSU reporting requirements regarding U.S. taxpayers employed by these companies’ foreign subsidiaries.

This may result in placing additional burden on these employees, including going back and amending their prior tax returns to properly reflect the tax liability that resulted from RSUs. Therefore, employees in this situation should be especially concerned regarding the proper treatment of RSUs by their employer.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Questions Regarding RSUs

If you have any questions about the taxation of RSUs, or other stock option plans, or if you seek to minimize your taxation through proper tax planning, you should contact Sherayzen Law Office today.

IRS Investigation of Tax Crimes

/1 Comment/in , /by

This article will explain the basics of criminal tax investigations. It is extremely important if you find yourself under such an investigation, or believe that the potential for a criminal investigation exists in your case, that you obtain an experienced attorney to represent you.

Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 7608(b) grants the right to the criminal investigators of the IRS’ Intelligence Division to investigate tax crimes. There are various means by which the IRS may decide to begin a criminal investigation, including audits that indicate potential fraud, informant’s tips, or other credible reports, such as newspaper articles about fraudulent behavior. An IRS agent will begin to collect more information at this point as part of the procedures of the Internal Revenue Manual in order to establish a “firm indication of fraud.” Once such an indication can be demonstrated, the taxpayer’s civil audit will be suspended, and referred to the Criminal Investigation Division (CID).

The Criminal Investigation Division (CID) of the IRS is empowered under IRC Sections 7622 and 7602 to examine records, books and other supporting documents regarding information contained in tax returns, to take testimony and to administer oaths.

Taxpayers and their representatives will not be informed of the reasons for the suspension once their case is referred to the CID. It is thus crucial that taxpayers be careful regarding any statements they may make to an IRS agent, as the potential exists for such information to be used against them in a criminal proceeding.

After a case is referred to the CID, it will be reviewed by the CID Chief. The Chief will then assign a Special Agent to investigate if it is felt that the case clearly indicates possible fraud. The Special Agent, accompanied by another agent serving as a witness, may then contact the taxpayer, without prior notice. The agent is required to give the taxpayer a Miranda-type warning. An agent may also, in certain circumstances, obtain a search warrant, as well as the summons power under IRC Section 7602.

If an agent determines after the investigation that a prosecution should be in order, the case will then be forwarded to the IRS attorneys. Under the criminal standard of proof, it must be demonstrated that the evidence against the taxpayer is sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and that it is a reasonable probability that the taxpayer will be convicted of the crimes alleged.

Once the case is transferred, the taxpayer will then usually have the opportunity to present any defenses at a special conference with the IRS. If the IRS counsel agrees that the taxpayer should be prosecuted after the evidence and arguments presented at the conference, the case will then be referred to the Tax Division of the Department of Justice for review. If the DOJ attorney decides that the taxpayer should be prosecuted, the case may be then transferred to the U.S. Attorney (the DOJ attorney may also give the U.S. Attorney discretion of whether to prosecute, or not, in certain cases). The U.S. attorney may in some circumstances receive the case with an authorization for a grand jury investigation to be conducted.

As can be seen from the information above, criminal tax investigations are a serious matter. There are numerous potential pitfalls that may arise at any step of a tax investigation that may lead a taxpayer to ultimately wind up being convicted for a tax crime.

The taxpayers are advised to obtain experienced tax attorneys to represent them if they believe, at any point in their civil investigation that the potential for a criminal investigation exists.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Legal Advice Regarding Criminal Tax Matters

If you believe that you may be subject to a criminal IRS investigation, contact Sherayzen Law Office. Our experienced tax law firm will analyze the facts of your case, offer defense options and rigorously represent your interests during the IRS investigation and any court proceedings.

Deductibility of Meals on Schedule C: General Overview

/in , /by

Virtually every business incurs some type of meal-related expenses. A question arises as to whether such meals are deductible and to what extent. This article provides a general overview of this topic; remember, though, that the deductibility of meals is highly fact-dependent and this article only provides an educational background to this issue, NOT a legal advice.

General Rule

Generally, expenses incurred with respect to the entertainment-related meals are not deductible, unless the taxpayer is able to establish that the expense is directly related to the active conduct of a business or trade.

However, if a meal expense directly precedes or follows a bona fide business discussion (including a convention meeting), then it is deductible if it is established that the expense was associated with the active conduct of a trade or business. The taxpayers needs to be able to establish that this is the case.

Restrictions on the General Rule

The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) places two broad restrictions on the general rule. First, if neither the taxpayer nor the taxpayer’s employee is present at the meal, then, generally, meal expenses are not deductible.

Second, a meals deduction is not allowed where the expense is lavish or extravagant under the circumstances. This topic has been the subject of controversy for some time now as large corporations have engaged in entertaining their important guests in a manner that the IRS may sometime classify as “lavish.”

It is important to point out that these restriction would not apply to certain exceptions to the general rule.

Exceptions to the General Rule

IRC Section 274(e) specifically provides that some exceptions are not subject to the general rule described above and are deductible as ordinary and necessary expenses (as long as they are properly substantiated). The exceptions are:

a. Food and beverages furnished on the business premises primarily to the taxpayer’s employees;

b. Expenses for services, goods, and facilities that are treated as compensation or wages for withholding tax purposes. If the recipient is a specified individual, then the employer’s deduction cannot exceed the amount of compensation reported. IRC Section 274(e)(2)(B) defines who is a “specified individual”; here, it is sufficient to state that it generally means an officer, director, ten-percent shareholder or a related person;

c. Reimbursed expenses: “expenses paid or incurred by the taxpayer, in connection with the performance by him of services for another person (whether or not such other person is his employer), under a reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement with such other person”. IRC Section 274(e)(3). However, this exception applies only if: (1) services are performed for an employer and the employer has not treated such expenses as wages subject to withholding; or (2) where the services are performed for a person other than an employer and the taxpayer accounts to such person;

d. Expenses for recreational, social, or similar activities (including facilities therefor) primarily for the benefit of employees (other than employees who are highly compensated employees (within the meaning of section 414(q)). See IRC Section 274(e)(4) for further details on treatment of shareholders. The most common example of this exception are company picnics;

e. Expenses incurred by a taxpayer which are directly related to business meetings of his employees, stockholders, agents, or directors. IRC Section 274(e)(5);

f. Expenses directly related and necessary to attendance at a business meeting or convention of any organization described in section 501(c)(6) (relating to business leagues, chambers of commerce, real estate boards, and boards of trade) and exempt from taxation under section 501(a). IRC Section 274(e)(6);

g. Expenses for goods, services, and facilities made available by the taxpayer to the general public. IRC Section 274(e)(7);

h. Expenses for goods or services (including the use of facilities) which are sold by the taxpayer in a bona fide transaction for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth. IRC Section 274(e)(8); and

i. Expenses paid or incurred by the taxpayer for goods, services, and facilities furnished to non-employees as entertainment, amusement, or recreation to the extent that the expenses are includible in the gross income of a recipient and reported on a Form 1099-MISC by the taxpayer.

It is very important to note that exceptions a, e, and f maybe subject to the “50-Percent Limitation” rule.

50-Percent Limitation Rule

Generally, a taxpayer can only deduct 50 percent of the allowable meal and entertainment expenses, including such expenses incurred in the course of travel. The process in calculating the 50-percent limitation involves, first, the calculation of the allowable deductions through the process of exclusion of non-allowable deductions (e.g. lavish portion of the meal) and addition of related expenses (e.g. taxes, tips, room rental, and parking fees) and, then, the 50-percent rule applies. Note that the allowable deductions for transportation costs to and form a business meal are not reduced.

The 50-percent rule maybe subject to various statutory modifications based on profession or the nature of activity. For example, the transportation workers may deduct 80 percent. There are also complications with respect to a leasing company and independent contractors.

Exceptions to the 50-Percent Limitation Rule

The 50-Percent Limitation rule is riddled with exceptions.

First, exceptions b, c, d, g, h and i described above (see Exceptions to General Rule section) are not subject to the 50-Percent Limitation rule.

Second, the food expenses classified as de minimis fringe benefits and excludable from the recipient’s gross income are also not subject to the 50-Percent limitation rule.

Third, there are somewhat complicated exceptions related to the tickets to a sporting events.

Fourth, employee’s meal expenses incurred while moving are not subject to the 50-Percent Limitations rule if they are reimbursed by the employer and includible in the employee’s gross income.

There are various other exceptions to the 50-Percent Limitations rule such as food and beverages provided to employees on certain vessels, oil or gas platforms, drilling rigs, and so on.

Conclusion

This article provides a general review of the rules regarding deductibility of meal on Schedule C. However, this is only an educational article and it does NOT offer a tax or legal advice. You should see a tax professional regarding your specific facts.