Underpayment and Overpayment Interest Rates for the First Quarter of 2012

/in , /by

On November 29, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service announced that underpayment and overpayment interest rates will remain the same for the calendar quarter beginning January 1, 2012. The rates will be:

  • three (3) percent for overpayments (two (2) percent in the case of a corporation)
  • three (3) percent for underpayments
  • five (5) percent for large corporate underpayments
  • one-half (0.5) percent for the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000

Under the Internal Revenue Code, the rate of interest is determined on a quarterly basis. For taxpayers other than corporations, the overpayment and underpayment rate is the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points. Generally, in the case of a corporation, the underpayment rate is the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points and the overpayment rate is the federal short-term rate plus 2 percentage points.

The rate for large corporate underpayments is the federal short-term rate plus 5 percentage points. The rate on the portion of a corporate overpayment of tax exceeding $10,000 for a taxable period is the federal short-term rate plus one-half (0.5) of a percentage point.

Notice 88-59, 1988-1 C.B. 546, announced that, in determining the quarterly interest rates to be used for overpayments and underpayments of tax under section 6621, the Internal Revenue Service will use the federal short-term rate based on daily compounding because that rate is most consistent with section 6621 which, pursuant to section 6622, is subject to daily compounding.

Interest factors for daily compound interest for annual rates of 0.5 percent are published in Appendix A of Revenue Ruling 2011-32. Interest factors for daily compound interest for annual rates of 2 percent, 3 percent and 5 percent are published in Tables 7, 9, 11, and 15 of Rev. Proc. 95-17, 1995-1 C.B. 561, 563, 565, and 569.

Form 8938 New Foreign Asset Reporting Requirements: Introduction

/in , /by

In its continuous efforts to combat tax evasion, the IRS imposed a brand-new foreign asset reporting requirements on U.S. persons.  For the very first time, starting tax year 2011 (with certain exceptions), certain individuals must file the new Form 8938 to report the ownership of specified foreign financial assets if the total value of those assets exceeds an applicable threshold amount.

This threshold amount differs depending on the particular situation of a U.S. person – whether an individual lives in the United States, is married and filing a joint income tax return, et cetera.

The “specified foreign financial assets” include any financial account maintained by foreign financial institution and certain investment assets such as stock, securities or any other interest in a foreign entity and any financial instrument or contract with an issuer or counterparty who is not a U.S. person.

Based on this description alone, it becomes obvious that the new Form is likely to impose a higher reporting burden than the famous FBARs.   Note that Form 8938 does not replace the FBAR reporting requirements – i.e. the FBARs must still be filed by June 30 (former FBAR due date) of a relevant year in addition to Form 8938.

Unlike the FBAR, Form 8938 is attached to the filer’s annual tax return and must be filed by the due date (including extensions) for that return.  An annual return includes the following forms: Form 1040, Form 1120, Form 1065, Form 1120-F, Form 1120-S, and Form 1040NR (of a nonresident alien who is a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico or American Samoa).

Note that Form 8938 imposes new failure-to-file and accuracy-related penalties, which are very severe and may be combined with other penalties.  Moreover, failure to file an accurate Form 8938 may extend the statute of limitations for all or a part of your income tax return until three years after the date on which you file Form 8938.

Note that, pursuant to Notice 2011-55, the IRS provides for a transitional rule for the year 2011 which may defer your obligation to file Form 8938 until the tax year 2012 as long as you satisfy all of the three requirements of the transitional rule.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office For Legal Help With Form 8938

This article highlights a few features of the new Form 8938 and it should not be relied upon in determining whether you are obligated to file Form 8938.  Form 8938 is fairly complex and you need professional help to determine how to comply with the Form’s requirements.

If you have any questions with respect to Form 8938, please contact Sherayzen Law Office.  Our experienced international tax firm will help you determine whether you must file Form 8938 and help you draft and file the form with your tax return in order to avoid the heavy IRS penalties for non-compliance.

Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs)

/in , /by

The term limited liability partnership (“LLP”) is often used in public discourse- often erroneously. What exactly is an LLP, and what are its features compared to a traditional, general partnership? This article will attempt to answer that question and provide you with some basic understanding of LLPs.

Please note that this article is intended to only cover the general aspects of LLPs- the majority of states currently allow for the LLP form, and state laws vary widely, so applicable state laws for specifics relating to your particular situation will need to be consulted.

Advantages of an LLP

In general, an LLP is a type of partnership in which some or all partners may have limited liability, meaning that partners are not liable for damages resulting from negligence, fraud, malpractice or similar misconduct committed by another partner. This is an essential difference between LLPs and general (unlimited) partnerships. This feature thus provides an important advantage that the corporate form provides for shareholders.

It should be noted, partners in an LLP are still personally liable for any negligence, fraud, malpractice or similar misconduct that they themselves commit.

Another advantage of an LLP is that LLP profits are distributed among the partners for taxation purposes under pass-through rules, and thus are not subject to double-taxation.

Finally, an advantage of LLPs compared to LLCs is that in states that impose franchise taxes on operations, LLPs will not have to pay such taxes, whereas LLCs may have to, depending upon state law.

Remember, whether an LLP is an advantageous form of business for you will depend on your particular circumstances. What appears to be an advantage in one situation may actually become a disadvantage in another. Therefore, you need to consult with a business and tax attorney before deciding whether an LLP is the most convenient form for your particular business.

Certain Aspects of LLPs

LLPs are often utilized by service providers, such as physicians, attorneys, architects, accountants and similar professionals. Articles of LLP must be filed with the Secretary of State of applicable states that allow for LLP formation.

When an LLP is formed, states either require the firm’s name to include the term “limited liability partnership” or “registered limited liability partnership”, or applicable abbreviations, in order to properly inform the public as to its business form.

Some Aspects of Various LLP Statutes

As noted above, statutes differ widely, and should be examined for your particular situation.

Despite the general LLP limited liability rule, certain states may scale back this feature to some degree. For example, in some states, LLP partners may still be jointly and severally liable for matters relating to contractual liability of the LLP.

In general, some states provide for transformation of an unlimited partnership into an LLP. A number of states also allow for only majority- and not unanimous consent- of partners of a general partnerships to become an LLP.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office NOW for Legal and Tax Help For Your Business

The formation of partnerships, limited liability partnerships and other business and tax matters can involve complex issues and knowledge of applicable state and Federal laws, and this article only attempts to provide a very general background information that should not be relied upon in making the determination of your specific situation. Rather, you should contact Sherayzen Law Office for legal help with this issue. Our experienced business and tax firm will guide you through the complex web of rules concerning partnership, LLP, LLC, corporate formation and taxation matters.

Cash and Property Contributions to Partnerships and Their Affect on a Partnership Interest

/in , /by

A partnership is defined to mean the relationship between two or more persons to carry on a trade or business, with each person contributing money, property, labor, or skill, and each expecting to share in profits and losses.  This article will provide a broad overview of some of the tax consequences of cash and property contributions to a partnership (whether upon formation or additional contributions later), the basis of partnership interests received by partners, the basis of contributed property to the partnership, and some other helpful information.

Basis of a Partner’s Interest

The basis of a partnership interest is the cash contributed by a partner, increased by the adjusted basis of any property contributed by a partner. In general, no gain or loss will be recognized when property is contributed by a partner in exchange for an interest in a partnership; however, in certain circumstances (explained further in this article), a partner must recognize gain, and if so, this gain is included in the basis of his or her partnership interest.

Special rules apply to a partner’s contribution to the partnership in the form of assumption of a partnership’s liabilities.

Basis of Contributed Property to the Partnership (Transferred Basis)

For the partnership, the basis of contributed property (for the purpose of determining depreciation, depletion, gain, or loss for the property) will be the same as the partner’s adjusted basis for the property as of the date it was contributed, increased by any gain that must be recognized by the partner.

Contribution of Property- Top Three Exceptions to General Recognition Rules

As mentioned above, usually no gain or loss will be recognized by either a partner or partnership when property is contributed to a partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership. This general rule applies to both situations where a partnership is being formed and already existing partnerships.

However, there are some exceptions to this rule, three of which are explained below.

1) Property Subject to a Liability

If a partner contributes property that is subject to a liability, or if a partner’s liabilities are assumed by the partnership, that partner’s basis interest will usually be reduced (but never below zero) by the amount of the liability assumed by the other partners. The partner’s basis should be reduced because the assumption of the liability is treated as a distribution of cash to that partner; the other partners’ assumption of the liability is likely to be treated as a cash contribution by them to the partnership.

In most circumstances, a partner must recognize gain when property is contributed which is subject to a liability, and the resulting decrease in the partner’s individual liability exceeds the partner’s partnership basis.

2) Partnership Would be an Investment Company if Incorporated

Gain will be recognized when property is contributed in exchange for a partnership interest if the partnership would be treated as an investment company, if it were incorporated .

A partnership will usually be treated as an investment company if over 80% of the value of its assets is held for investment, and it consists of certain readily marketable items, such as money, stocks and other equity interests, real estate investment trusts, and interests in regulated investment companies. Whether a partnership will be treated as an investment company or not, is typically determined immediately after the contribution of property.

3) Partnership Capital in Exchange for Services Rendered

In most circumstances, if a partner receives a partnership interest in exchange for services rendered, that partner must recognize compensation income.

Partnership’s Holding Period for Contributed Property

Usually, the partnership’s holding period for contributed property includes the partner’s holding period.

Partner’s Holding Period for Partnership Interest

A partner’s holding period for a partnership interest usually includes the holding period of the property contributed (if the property was a capital asset or Section 1231 asset to the contributing partner).

Treatment of Built-In Gain/Loss to the Partnership

In general, if a partner contributes (non-depreciable) property, and the partnership eventually sells or exchanges the property and recognizes gain or loss, the built-in gain or loss must be allocated to the contributing partner. (If the property is depreciable, detailed rules apply to allocation procedures).

Partner’s Basis Increases/Decreases

A partner’s basis will usually increase by any additional contributions by a partner to a partnership (including an increased share of, or assumption of, a partnership’s liabilities), a partner’s distributive share of taxable and nontaxable partnership income, and in general, a partner’s distributive share of the excess of the deductions for depletion over the basis of depletable property.

In general, a partner’s basis will decrease (but not below zero) by any money (including a decreased share of partnership liabilities, or an assumption of the partner’s individual liabilities by the partnership) and adjusted basis of property distributed by a partnership to a partner, a partner’s distributive share of partnership losses, and a partner’s distributive share of nondeductible partnership expenses that are not capital expenditures (including a partner’s share of any section 179 expenses).

Contact Sherayzen Law Office For Legal and Tax Help Regarding Partnerships

The contribution of property to partnerships and various partnership-partner taxation matters can involve complex issues, and this article only attempts to provide a very general background information that should not be relied upon in forming a partnership, contributing property to the partnership or any other specific taxation aspects. Rather, you should contact Sherayzen Law Office for legal help with this issue. Our experienced business tax firm will guide you through the complex web of rules concerning U.S. partnership formation and taxation matters and help you with your specific needs.

Case Note: Weller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

/in , /by

This brief case note describes one of the recent cases of the U.S. tax court.  This description is not a legal advice and may not be relied upon as such.

On September 20, 2011, the tax court ruled in favor of the taxpayer and found that he engaged in his business activities for profit (see Weller v. Comm’r, T.C.M. 2011-224 (T.C. 09/20/11)).

The main issue in this case was whether the taxpayer engaged in his glider plane-related activities during the years in issue with the objective of making a profit within the meaning of section 183.  After being laid off from Boeing in 2002, the taxpayer decided to start a business where he would off high-performance glider training.  On August 1, 2003, petitioner formed Northwest Eagle Soaring, L.L.C. (“Northwest”), in Washington. Northwest provides private glider flight instruction and glider plane rides. The taxpayer did not prepare a business plan for Northwest.

The taxpayer is licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as a Certified Flight Instructor Airplane, Certified Flight Instructor Instruments, and Certified Flight Instructor Glider. Petitioner performed flight instruction for the Boeing Employees Soaring Club.

In late 2003, the taxpayer used money he inherited to complete his purchase of a DG-1000 high-performance glider plane for $180,000, and he placed it in service on November 22, 2003. Northwest conducts its activities primarily on weekends from March through November. Glider flights are restricted to times of good visibility. For business promotion, Northwest maintains a Web site, distributes marketing flyers to locations such as airports and aviation-related businesses, and advertises in a flying publication. The taxpayer  maintained flight logs for the glider activities as required by the FAA.

In 2004, the taxpayer focused his time on the Northwest activities and did not have other employment.  For the years 2005-2007, he worked for other companies, but still deducted unreimbursed employee expenses related to Northwest.

The IRS audited the tax returns for the years 2005-2007 and found that the taxpayer did not have a profit-making objective (i.e. that his Northwest activities were just a hobby).

The tax court disagreed. After finding that the taxpayer’s subjective intent to make profit is the focus of the test, the court looked in detail at the factors provided by the IRS regulations to determine such intent (Section 1.183-2(b)).   There were nine relevant factors: (1) The manner in which the taxpayer carried on the activity; (2) the expertise of the taxpayer or his advisers; (3) the time and effort expended by the taxpayer in carrying on the activity; (4) the expectation that the assets used in the activity may appreciate in value; (5) the success of the taxpayer in carrying on other activities for profit; (6) the taxpayer’s history of income or losses with respect to the activity; (7) the amount of occasional profits, if any, that are earned from the activity; (8) the financial status of the taxpayer; and (9) whether elements of personal pleasure or recreation are involved in the activity.

Upon careful application of the facts to these nine factors, the court found that the taxpayer engaged in the glider activities with the primary purpose and intent of realizing an economic profit independent of tax savings during the years in issue.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office For Tax Court Representation

If you disagree with the IRS determination in your case and wish to challenge it the Tax Court, contact Sherayzen Law Office for diligent, zealous, and affordable tax court representation.