international tax lawyers

2015 Second Quarter IRS Underpayment and Overpayment Interest Rates

/0 Comments/in , /by

On March 13, 2015, the IRS announced that the underpayment and overpayment interest rates for the calendar quarter beginning April 1, 2015, will remain unchanged. The rates will be:

three (3) percent for overpayments [two (2) percent in the case of a corporation];
three (3) percent for underpayments;
five (5) percent for large corporate underpayments; and
one-half (0.5) percent for the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000.

How are the IRS Underpayment and Overpayment Rates Determined?

Under the Internal Revenue Code, the rate of interest is determined on a quarterly basis. For taxpayers other than corporations, the overpayment and underpayment rate is the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points.

Generally, in the case of a corporation, the underpayment rate is the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points and the overpayment rate is the federal short-term rate plus 2 percentage points. The rate for large corporate underpayments is the federal short-term rate plus 5 percentage points. The rate on the portion of a corporate overpayment of tax exceeding $10,000 for a taxable period is the federal short-term rate plus one-half (0.5) of a percentage point.

The rate for large corporate underpayments is the federal short-term rate plus 5 percentage points. The rate on the portion of a corporate overpayment of tax exceeding $10,000 for a taxable period is the federal short-term rate plus one-half (0.5) of a percentage point.

What do the IRS Underpayment and Overpayment Rates Affect?

The most important impact of the IRS underpayment and overpayment rates is felt whenever the tax liability of a US taxpayer changes from the liability indicated on the original tax return. Most often, this happens as a result of an amended tax return filed voluntarily by the taxpayer or as a result of an IRS audit.

If, as a result of an audit or an amended tax return, the taxpayer is assessed with additional tax liability, the underpayment interest rate will be applied from the due date of the original tax return (usually, April 15) through the date of assessment of additional tax liability (or the date the amended tax return is filed). Conversely, if an amended tax return or an IRS audit produces a refund, then, the IRS is obligated to pay the overpayment interest rate on the refund due.

IRS Underpayment Rate and PFIC Calculations

The IRS Underpayment Rate has a surprising additional affect on a taxpayer’s liability. If a taxpayer owns a PFIC that is considered a Section 1291 fund, then, under the default PFIC method, he will need to calculate PFIC interest on the PFIC tax due. This PFIC interest is calculated at the IRS underpayment rates.

Incorrect or Delinquent Form 5471 Penalties

/2 Comments/in , /by

Various Form 5471 penalties are associated with failure to file Form 5471 or the filing of an incorrect Form 5471. In this article, I will describe the most important of these penalties.

IRS Form 5471

The IRS Form 5471 is an extremely complex form that is used to satisfy the reporting requirements of two esoteric sections of the Internal Revenue Code: 26 U.S.C. § 6038 (“Information reporting with respect to certain foreign corporations and partnerships”) and 26 U.S.C. § 6046 (“Returns as to organization or reorganization of foreign corporations and as to acquisitions of their stock”).

As long as Form 5471 requirements are met, the Form must be filed by certain U.S. citizens and residents who are officers, directors, or shareholders in specified foreign corporations with their US tax returns.  Failure to file Form 5471 or failure to file a correct Form 5471, can result in steep penalties.

Form 5471 Penalties: Failure to file information required under section 26 U.S.C. § 6038(a) 

From the outset, it is important to note that 26 U.S.C. § 6038 applies to two different parts of Form 5471: the Form 5471 proper (i.e. the first four pages containing the identifying information and Schedules A through I) and Schedule M of Form 5471.   Failure to file either is enough to trigger a $10,000 penalty for each annual accounting period of each foreign corporation. If the IRS sends the taxpayer a notice of a failure to file, an additional $10,000 penalty (per foreign corporation) will be charged for each 30-day period (or fraction thereof), during which the failure continues after the 90-day period in which the notification occurred, has expired. This additional penalty is limited to a maximum of $50,000 for each failed filing.

Furthermore, there is an income tax penalty associated with the failure to comply with 26 U.S.C. § 6038 in a timely manner – the taxpayer may be subject to a 10% reduction of certain available Foreign Tax Credits. A further 5% reduction may be applied for each 3-month period (or fraction thereof), during which the failure to timely report or file continues after the 90-day period of IRS notification has expired. (26 U.S.C. § 6038(c)(2) places certain limitations on this penalty).

The Second Set of Form 5471 Penalties: Failure to file information required by 26 U.S.C. § 6046 and related regulations (Form 5471 and Schedule O)

In addition to 26 U.S.C. § 6038 Form 5471 penalties, there is also an additional set of Form 5471 penalties associated with 26 U.S.C. § 6046 (Form 5471 and Schedule O).  Failure to comply with 26 U.S.C. § 6046 will subject the taxpayer to another $10,000 penalty for each failure for each reportable transaction. Additionally, if the failure to report or file continues for more than 90 days after the date the IRS mails notice of this failure, an additional $10,000 penalty will apply for each 30-day period (or fraction thereof) during which the failure continues after the 90-day period has expired. This additional penalty is limited to a maximum of $50,000.

Form 5471 Non-Compliance May Result in Criminal Penalties

In addition to civil penalties under 26 U.S.C. § 6038 and 26 U.S.C. § 6046, criminal penalties may apply to Form 5471 filers in certain circumstances. In particular, a willful failure to file an accurate Form 5471 may activate the  broad provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 7203 (“Willful failure to file return, supply information, or pay tax”), 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (“Fraud and false statements”), and 26 U.S.C. § 7207 (“Fraudulent returns, statements, or other documents”).

Form 5471 Penalties and Persons Other Than the Filer

In situations where the filer should have filed Forms 5471 for other persons, but failed to do so, Form 5471 penalties may be extended to these other persons.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office For Help With Form 5471 Penalties and Compliance

If you partially or fully own a foreign corporation, you may be subject to the Form 5471 requirements.  As explained in this article, failure to timely and/or correctly comply with Forms 5471 may result in steep Form 5471 penalties.

This is why you should contact the experienced Form 5471 tax professionals of Sherayzen Law Office.  We can help you  prepare and file your Form 5471 as part of your annual compliance as well as help deal with the Form 5471 voluntary disclosure. So, Call Us Now to Schedule Your Confidential Consultation!

Costa Rica Corporations and U.S. Tax Reporting

/in , /by

It has become common for U.S. citizens to engage in business abroad through a foreign corporation.  Costa Rica is definitely one of the most favored countries in Central America, partially due to its reputation for stability.  It is important to understand, however, that U.S. citizens who engage in business abroad through a foreign corporation must comply with very important tax reporting requirements.   In this article, I will try to briefly go over some of the most common US tax reporting requirements that may concern U.S. owners of Costa Rica corporations.

Form 5471

IRS Form 5471 is the most direct reporting requirement that U.S. owners of Costa Rica corporations may face.  Form 5471 may undoubtedly be considered as one of the most complex U.S. tax forms, both in its content as well as its scope.

As of the time of this writing, there are four non-exclusive (i.e. a taxpayer can belong to multiple categories at the same time) categories of filers of Costa Rica corporations who must file Form 5471.  Determining the categories, if any, to which a taxpayer belongs is a legal decision and a very important one since the number and severity of the reporting requirements directly depends on the number of  categories applicable to the taxpayer.

If the taxpayer is required to Form 5471 for Costa Rica corporations, then he must do so by attaching the completed Form 5471 with all of the numerous attachments to his tax return.

Failure to file Form 5471 for Costa Rica corporations may have severe consequences.  Explore this article for more information on Form 5471 penalties.

Form 8938

IRS Form 8938 is a newcomer to the world of U.S. tax compliance – in fact, the tax year 2001 is the first year that the form must be filed with the taxpayer’s U.S. tax return.

Form 8938 should be filed only if certain threshold requirements are met.  In case the taxpayer already disclosed the information regarding the specified foreign asset on Form 5471, Form 8938 should be filed to cross-reference Form 5471.  Explore this article to learn more about Form 8938.

FBAR

As long as the basic threshold requirement is met, the Report on Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBAR”) may be required if the taxpayer is the owner of a foreign corporation and has signatory authority (either as an officer of the corporation or an owner) over the corporate accounts.

It is highly important to comply with the FBAR requirement because the FBAR contains perhaps the most severe penalty structure of any other reporting requirement in the entire Internal Revenue Code (IRC).

Subpart “F” Income

If you are an owner of a Controlled Foreign Corporation (“CFC”) and the CFC has subpart “F” income, then you may be required to report subpart “F” income on your personal tax return (e.g. Form 1040).  This income is likely to be treated in a highly unfavorable way by the IRC.

Other Forms

Other forms may be required to be filed as a result of the your ownership of Costa Rica corporations.   Most of these additional tax reporting requirements are triggered by various transactional activities conducted by the corporation or between you and your corporation.  You should consult an international tax attorney for detailed analysis of your specific situation.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for U.S. Tax Compliance Requirements if You Own Shares of Costa Rica Corporations

If you own a corporation in Costa Rica or you intend to do so, you should contact Sherayzen Law Office.  Owner Eugene Sherayzen will analyze your particular situation, determine what U.S. tax reporting requirements apply to you and help you comply with them, and offer a rigorous ethical tax plan designed to make sure that you do not overpay your U.S. taxes under the current IRC provisions.

The Location of Your International Tax Lawyers Austin Texas

/0 Comments/in , /by

Choosing your lawyer among International Tax Lawyers Austin Texas is not a simple task, especially for a US taxpayer thinking about doing an offshore voluntary disclosure. One of the critical questions often arises is whether it is better to retain an international tax lawyer in Austin or in Minneapolis if you live in Austin? It is also related to a broader question: is the location of your international tax lawyer important?

Let’s analyze this question in the context of retaining one or more International Tax Lawyers Austin Texas.

International Tax Lawyers Austin Texas: US International Tax Law and Geography

One of the most critical aspects of US international tax law is that it does not respect national or state borders. Rather, it focuses on the individual taxpayer; if the taxpayer is a US person, then he is subject to US international tax law.

Another important aspect of US international tax law is that it applies uniformly (with a few exceptions, such blockades, sanctions, et cetera) irrespective of where the individual taxpayer is.

This means that, if you are in Austin and searching for International Tax Lawyers Austin Texas, it does not matter whether your lawyer is physically located in Austin, Minneapolis or Buenos Aires. The knowledge of international tax law of your lawyer and the application of that law to your specific case does not depend on the physical location of your lawyer.

International Tax Lawyers Austin Texas: Expertise and Experience in International Tax Law is the Critical Criteria, Not Geography

Based on this logic, it is easy to see that the geographical location of your International Tax Lawyers Austin Texas is not the most important factor in your decision to retain an attorney. Rather, it is a lawyer’s expertise in international tax law that should drive your decision.

If you feel comfortable with the lawyer’s grasp of the subject matter and his experience in handling cases involving issues similar to the ones involved in your case, then these factors should be the critical factors on which your decision to retain the an international tax lawyer should be based.

International Tax Lawyers Austin Texas: “Face-to-Face” Meetings Obstacle Has Been Overcome By Modern Technology

There is a common misconception that your international tax lawyer must be near you in order to understand you and be able to render advice.

About a third of my clients are overseas and, additionally, more than a third of my clients are located in the United States but outside of Minnesota, leaving me with only about a quarter of my clients physically located in Minnesota. Yet, this factor never influenced the outcome in any of my cases.

In the modern world of Video Skype Conferences, the value of the face-to-face meetings has deteriorated and, in most cases, completely disappeared.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help With International Tax Issues

Hence, if you are searching for International Tax Lawyers Austin Texas, contact the international tax law team of Sherayzen Law Office (physically based in Minneapolis, MN). Our team of international tax professionals has developed deep expertise in international tax law based on the help that we have rendered to hundreds of US taxpayers worldwide.

So, if you have international tax issues with respect to undeclared foreign accounts, international tax compliance or international tax planning, please contact an experienced international tax attorney, Mr. Eugene Sherayzen of Sherayzen Law Office for comprehensive legal and tax help.

Call Us Today to Schedule Your Confidential Consultation!

Introduction to US International Tax Anti-Deferral Regimes

/0 Comments/in , /by

Despite their enormous importance to tax compliance, there is a shocking level of ignorance of the US international tax anti-deferral regimes that is being displayed by US taxpayers, foreign bankers, foreign accountants, foreign attorneys, US accountants and even many US tax attorneys. In this article, for educational purposes only, I would like to provide a brief overview of the history and features of the main US international tax anti-deferral regimes.

What is a US International Tax Anti-Deferral Regime?

A US international tax anti-deferral regime is a set of US tax laws designed to prevent US taxpayers from utilizing various offshore strategies to defer US taxation of their income for a period of time or indefinitely.

Three Main US International Tax Anti-Deferral Regimes

Since 1937, there have been three main US international tax anti-deferral regimes: Foreign Personal Holding Company (“FPHC”) rules, subpart F rules, and PFIC rules. Let’s review the brief history and main features of each of these US international tax anti-deferral regimes.

First US International Tax Anti-Deferral Regime: FPHC

In 1937, the Congress for the first time addressed the offshore investment strategy problems by enacting the FPHC regime, which were designed to contemporaneously (i.e. in the year the income was earned) tax certain types of foreign corporations. In particular, FPHC rules targeted foreign corporations that had substantial investment income (i.e. passive income) compared to active business income – i.e. the FPHC rules effectively treat certain corporations as pass-through companies for the purposes of certain categories of passive income..

The FPHC rules were triggered only if both conditions of the then-Code §552(a) were satisfied. First, at least 60% of a foreign corporation’s gross income from the taxable year had to consist of “foreign personal holding company income”. The FPHC income included interest income, dividends, royalties, gains from the sale of securities or commodities, certain rents and certain income from personal services provided by shareholders of the FPHC. This was called the “income test”.

The second condition of the §552(a) was known as the “ownership test”. The ownership test was satisfied if at least 50% of either the total voting power or total value of the stock of the foreign corporation was owned by 5 or fewer individuals who were citizens or residents of the United States.

Despite the appearances, the FPHC regime was not very effective. It was actually not very hard to work around the FPHC rules with careful and creative tax planning. This is why, after the enactment of the Subpart F rules and the PFIC rules (which addressed some of the main inefficacies of the FPCH rules and made them redundant as a US international tax anti-deferral regime), the FPHC regime was finally repealed in the year 2004.

Second US International Tax Anti-Deferral Regime: Subpart F Rules

The second US international tax anti-deferral regime, the Subpart F rules, was enacted in 1962 and, despite numerous amendments, forms the core of the anti-deferral rules with respect to Controlled Foreign Corporations (“CFCs”). It is definitely one of the most important and complex pieces of US tax legislation.

The most important feature of the Subpart F regime is that it greatly expands the scope of the former FPHC regime by expanding the contemporaneous (i.e. pass-through) taxation to a much broader range of income and activities, including many kinds of active business activities as well as passive investment activities of a foreign corporation. Obviously, the focus of this US international tax anti-deferral regime is still on passive income or attempts to disguise passive income as active income.

Third US International Tax Anti-Deferral Regime: PFIC Rules

The third US international tax anti-deferral regime consists of the passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) rules that were adopted by US Congress in 1986. Perhaps because it is the youngest of all US international tax anti-deferral regimes, the PFIC regime is more aggressive and less forgiving than Subpart F rules or FPHC regime. A lot of innocent taxpayers have fallen victims to this severe law.

The PFIC rules impose a unique additional US income tax in two circumstances: where (1) there is a gain on the disposition of the PFIC stock by the US person; or (2) there are PFIC distributions that are considered “excess distributions”. The PFIC rules also impose an additional PFIC interest (calculated similarly to underpayment interest) on the PFIC tax.

The definition of a PFIC is in some ways reminiscent of FPHC rules, but the PFIC regime is a lot more aggressive. Generally, a PFIC is any foreign corporation if it meets either the income tax or the assets test. The income tax is met if 75% of a foreign corporation’s gross income is passive; the assets test is satisfied if at least an average of 50% of a foreign corporation’s assets produce passive income.

Notice that the PFIC rules apply irrespective of the US ownership percentage of the company. This elimination of the FPHC and Subpart F ownership rules makes PFIC rules a much more comprehensive US international anti-deferral tax regime, because it is very easy to trigger PFIC rules – a lot of US naturalized citizens and permanent residents fall into the PFIC trap by simply owning foreign mutual funds as part of their former home countries’ investment portfolio.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help With Dealing with US International Tax Anti-Deferral Regimes

If you have an ownership interest in a foreign business or have foreign investments, you may be facing the extremely complex rules of US international tax anti-deferral regimes.

Please contact Mr. Eugene Sherayzen, an experienced international tax attorney at Sherayzen Law Office. Our international tax firm has helped hundreds of clients around the globe and we can help you!

Contact Us Today to Schedule Your Confidential Consultation!