international tax lawyers

No Form 5471 and Form 3520 Penalties – Q&A 18 of the OVDP

/in , /by

In my practice I have encountered situations where a taxpayer has delinquent Form 5471 or Form 3520, but there is no additional tax liability associated with the delinquent forms. In these situations, a natural questions arises on how to best deal with this situation.

One of the options is to follow Q&A 18 of the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) Rules. (This program is now discontinued). In very limited circumstances, Q&A 18 allows a small number of eligible taxpayers escape Form 5471 and Form 3520 penalties.

Background Information

Form 5471 is used by the IRS to satisfy the informational reporting requirements of 26 U.S.C. § 6038 (“Information reporting with respect to certain foreign corporations and partnerships”) and 26 U.S.C. § 6046 (“Returns as to organization or reorganization of foreign corporations and as to acquisitions of their stock”). It must be filed by certain U.S. citizens and residents who are officers, directors, or shareholders in specified foreign corporations, if various requirements are met. Failure to file Form 5471 may result in the imposition of steep penalties (see this article for more details).

Form 3520 (Annual Return To Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts) is used by U.S. persons (and executors of estates of U.S. decedents) to report certain transactions with foreign trusts, ownership of foreign trusts under the rules of IRC §§ 671 through 679, and receipt of certain large gifts or bequests from certain foreign persons. Failure to file Form 3520 may result in very heavy penalties.

Q&A 18

Q&A 18 of the OVDP Rules provides a potentially zero-penalty option for non-compliant taxpayers who failed to file tax information returns, such as Form 5471 and Form 3520.

From the outset, it is important to understand that Q&A 18 has a very limited application. It is only relevant in the situation where the taxpayer failed to file Forms 5471 or Forms 3520, but he reported and paid tax on all their taxable income with respect to all transactions related to the foreign corporations or foreign trusts. The IRS is not likely to impose a penalty for the failure to file the delinquent Forms 5471 and 3520 if there are no underreported tax liabilities and the taxpayer has not previously been contacted regarding an income tax examination or a request for delinquent returns.

Whether Q&A 18 applies to your particular situation is a question that should be determined by an international tax attorney experienced in the area of voluntary disclosures. NOTE: IRS OVDI & OVDP Programs are closed. If your attorney determines that this OVDP provision is applicable in your situation, the attorney should file delinquent information returns with the appropriate service center according to the instructions for the form and attach a statement explaining why the information returns are filed late. Note that the Form 5471 should be submitted with an amended return showing no change to income or tax liability. The attorney should further include at the top of the first page of each information return “OVDI – FAQ #18” to indicate that the returns are being submitted under this procedure.

Amended Return Shows Additional Income Unrelated to Form 5471

An interesting question arises in situations where amended tax returns do show additional income, but the income is not in any way related to Form 5471. While your attorney should carefully review the nature and source of the income, it is possible that Q&A 18 will still apply assuming all other requirement of Q&A 18 are met.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Voluntary Disclosure Help with Tax Information Returns

It must be remembered that this article is produced for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice; only your tax attorney can determine whether Q&A 18 applies to your situation and how to best comply with its requirements.

Note: The OVDP has been discontinued. If you have undisclosed foreign business entities or foreign trusts, contact Sherayzen Law Office for help. Our experienced international tax team will thoroughly review your case, assess your information tax return (Form 5471, 8865, 3520, et cetera) liability, identify the available voluntary disclosure options and implement the agreed-upon strategy (including preparation of all legal and tax documents).

FATCA at Home: Crackdown on Foreigners’ Accounts in U.S. banks

/in , /by

As the IRS engages in negotiations with foreign governments to implement FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) overseas, there is a rising pressure from some countries for reciprocity – the implementation of FATCA-like disclosure of foreign clients’ U.S. accounts to those clients’ home governments.

FATCA Background

FATCA was enacted in 2010 and set to begin taking effect at the end of 2013. FATCA is the mother of many new international tax requirements. One of the most unique features of FATCA (and most relevant for the purposes of this article) is requiring foreign banks to disclose information about the accounts of U.S. persons to the IRS. The goal of this provision is, of course, to expose U.S. persons who are trying to avoid the payment of U.S. taxes through undisclosed offshore accounts.

IRS Engages In Negotiations With Foreign Governments to Implement FATCA

In order to effectively implement FATCA requirements, the Department of the Treasury has to secure the cooperation of foreign governments (especially since disclosure of information required by FATCA may constitute a violation of some countries’ privacy laws). This is why the IRS is engaged in negotiations with a broad range of foreign governments (actually, over 50 foreign jurisdictions) to implement the information reporting and withholding tax provisions of FATCA.

The Department of the Treasury pursues the policy of concluding a series of bilateral tax agreements based on the model treaty developed by the Treasury.

The Treasury Department has already concluded a bilateral agreement with the United Kingdom, Ireland, Denmark and Mexico. Additional jurisdictions with which Treasury is in the process of finalizing an intergovernmental agreement and with which Treasury hopes to conclude negotiations by year end include: France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Japan, Switzerland, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Guernsey, Ireland, Isle of Man, Jersey, Mexico, the Netherlands, and Norway.

Jurisdictions with which Treasury is actively engaged in a dialogue towards concluding an intergovernmental agreement include: Argentina, Australia, Belgium, the Cayman Islands, Cyprus, Estonia, Hungary, Israel, Korea, Liechtenstein, Malaysia, Malta, New Zealand, the Slovak Republic, Singapore, and Sweden. Treasury expects to be able to conclude negotiations with several of these jurisdictions by year end.

The jurisdictions with which Treasury is working to explore options for intergovernmental engagement include: Bermuda, Brazil, the British Virgin Islands, Chile, the Czech Republic, Gibraltar, India, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Romania, Russia, Seychelles, Sint Maarten, Slovenia, and South Africa.

Push for Reciprocity from Foreign Governments

As the implementation of FATCA begins, however, the ancient Roman principle of “quid pro quo” seems to have become the theme of the IRS negotiations with foreign governments. It appears that some countries, possibly including France, Germany and China, are demanding reciprocity in the disclosure – i.e. if their banks have to disclose to the IRS the foreign accounts of U.S. persons, then U.S. banks should also disclose U.S. accounts of foreign nationals.

U.S. Positively Responds to Reciprocity Requests

It appears that the general trend in the Obama administration is to agree with the foreign governments and engage in partial or even full reciprocity. The Department of the Treasure spokesman stated that: “the United States is committed to a policy of transparency and equivalence, where appropriate, in furtherance of international cooperation to combat offshore tax evasion.”

Actually, according to an October 2012 letter to members of Congress from the Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy, Mark Mazur, the completed FATCA pacts already include commitments “to pursue equivalent levels of reciprocal automatic exchange in the future.” Moreover, the United States appears to have already shared some taxpayer information with foreign countries with which it has a tax treaty or a formal information-sharing agreement. The IRS this year started disclosing to some foreign governments information about bank interest payments earned by their citizens with U.S. bank accounts.

Mexican Nationals Maybe Impacted First, but Europeans May Follow Soon

Despite the impression that reciprocity is mainly a demand of the European government, it appears that Mexican nationals may be the first to feel the impact of disclosure, especially since, as mentioned above, the IRS already started disclosing bank interest payments to some foreign governments, including possibly Mexico.

However, while Mexicans may be the first affected by the reciprocity disclosures, it appears that it will be only a matter of time before the European nationals will be affected. This particularly concerns the French and German nationals.

2012 OVDP: The Voluntary Disclosure Period

/1 Comment/in , /by

One of the most critical aspects of the 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (2012 OVDP) are the rules pertaining to the voluntary disclosure period – i.e. what years are involved in calculating the Offshore Penalty and for how many years back should the tax returns be amended (with the corresponding consequences for the additional tax due with interest and penalties). These rules have been greatly expanded and elaborated since 2011 OVDI.

The general rule is that the voluntary disclosure period for the applicants to the 2012 OVDP involve the most recent eight tax years for which the due date has already passed. Critically important is to realize that the eight year period does not include current years for which there has not yet been non-compliance. For example, for taxpayers who submit a voluntary disclosure prior to April 15, 2012 (or other 2011 due date under extension), the disclosure must include each of the years 2003 through 2010 in which they have undisclosed foreign accounts and/or undisclosed foreign entities.

For the fiscal-year taxpayers must include fiscal years ending in calendar years 2003 through 2010. For taxpayers who disclose after the due date (or extended due date) for 2011, the disclosure must include 2004 through 2011.

For disclosures made in successive years, any additional years for which the due date has passed must be included, but a corresponding number of years at the beginning of the period will be excluded, so that each disclosure includes an eight year period.

For taxpayers who establish that they began filing timely, original, compliant returns that fully reported previously undisclosed offshore accounts or assets before making the voluntary disclosure, the voluntary disclosure period will begin with the eighth year preceding the most recent year for which the return filing due date has not yet passed, but will not include the compliant years. For example, in hypothetical where a taxpayer who historically filed income tax returns omitting the income from a foreign investment account, but who began reporting that income on his timely, original tax and information reporting returns for 2009 and 2010 without making a voluntary disclosure, and who filed a voluntary disclosure in January 2012, the voluntary disclosure period will be 2003 through 2008.

Understanding the rules of the voluntary disclosure period allows a taxpayer to plan the time of his disclosure according to his circumstances. Of course, such a benefit is only available in cases where there is sufficient time for such planning.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help with 2012 OVDP

If you have undisclosed foreign account or foreign entities and you plan to enter the 2012 OVDP, you should contact Sherayzen Law Office for help with your voluntary disclosure. Our experienced international tax firm will thoroughly analyze your case, assess your FBAR liability as well as other applicable penalties, identify the options available in your case, and work with you every step of the way until your voluntary disclosure is finished.

Gift and Estate Tax Impact of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012

/in , /by

One of the most dramatic effects of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) was felt in the area of gift and estate taxes.

Pre-ATRA Situation

In 2012, the estate and gift tax exemptions, indexed for inflation, were set at $5,120,000 each (up from $5,000,000 in 2011). Moreover, in 2012, the surviving spouse could use the unused exemption of a deceased spouse (this is called “portability”). Finally, the gift tax exemption was the same as the estate tax exemption, so taxpayers could make lifetime gifts that fully utilized their exemptions. In some situations, these gifts would shift the gifted assets’ future appreciation and income out of the donors’ taxable estates. The maximum tax rate for transfers in excess of the exemption was 35 percent.

All of these provisions expired on January 1, 2013. The $5,120,000 exemption was reduced to a $1,000,000 and the maximum tax rate was increased to 55 percent; the portability provision also expired. There was also a problem of the infamous “clawback” with respect to taxpayers who gifted their property using the higher exemption limits in 2012.

ATRA Changes

ATRA corrected the negative impact of the expiration of the 2012 gift and estate tax provisions. It set the permanent exemptions at $5,000,000 with one unexpected surprise – the exemption amount was indexed for inflation. This means that, for 2013, the exemption amount is $5,250,000. The higher exemption amount also renders the clawback provision harmless at this point.

Furthermore, ATRA reinstated the portability provision so that a surviving spouse can still use a deceased spouse’s unused exemption (provided that an estate tax return is filed and the portability election is properly made). However, it should be remembered that the portability is not available for a deceased spouse’s unused generation-skipping transfer tax exemption.

On the more negative side, ATRA raised the maximum tax rate from the 2012 levels to 40 percent. On the other hand, it is still a lot lower than the 55-percent tax that would have been applicable without ATRA.

With respect to charitable contributions, ATRA reinstated the exclusion from gross income for qualified charitable contributions by taxpayers over age 70 ½ of up to $100,000 distributed from an IRA through December 31, 2013. See this article for more details.

Annual Exclusion and Form 3520 Threshold Amount

For the tax year 2013, the gift tax annual exclusion increased from $13,000 to $14,000 per donee and from $139,000 to $143,000 for gifts made to a non-citizen spouse. The threshold at which gifts receivable from foreign partnerships and corporations become reportable to the IRS also increased from $13,258 to $15,102. The threshold amount for Form 3520 (with respect to value of gifts from foreign individuals and estates) remains at $100,000.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help with Your Estate and Tax Planning

If you are in the process of creating your estate and/or tax plan, contact Sherayzen Law Office for help. Our experienced estate planning tax firm will thoroughly review your case, identify available options and prepare all of the required legal and tax documents to implement your plan.

Offshore Accounts Disclosure and John Doe Summons

/in , , /by

If a taxpayer is about to conduct a voluntary disclosure of his offshore accounts, a question arises about his eligibility to do so in a situation where the IRS already served a “John Doe” summons or made a treaty request seeking information that may identify a taxpayer as holding an undisclosed foreign account or undisclosed foreign entity. The answer is that it depends on the timing of the disclosure.

Background Information

In an earlier article, I discussed the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) now closed eligibility requirements. Specifically, I discussed the timeliness eligibility requirement of IRM 9.5.11.9 and how a failure to satisfy this requirement will prevent the taxpayer from conducting a voluntary disclosure.

Under IRM 9.5.11.9, a voluntary disclosure is timely if it is received by the IRS before either of the following events occurs:

(a) the IRS has initiated a civil examination or criminal investigation of the taxpayer, or has notified the taxpayer that it intends to commence such an examination or investigation. Notice, it is not relevant whether the IRS has initiated a civil examination which is not related to undisclosed foreign accounts or undisclosed foreign entities – either of the two, civil examination and criminal investigation, will prevent OVDP participation;

(b) the IRS has received information from a third party (e.g., informant, other governmental agency, or the media) alerting the IRS to the specific taxpayer’s noncompliance;

(c) the IRS has initiated a civil examination or criminal investigation which is directly related to the specific liability of the taxpayer; or

(d) the IRS has acquired information directly related to the specific liability of the taxpayer from a criminal enforcement action (e.g., search warrant, grand jury subpoena).

General Analysis

For the purposes of this essay, John Doe summons and treaty requests most likely fit the situation described in paragraph (b). Hence, the main criteria regarding the taxpayer’s eligibility to conduct voluntary disclosure of his offshore accounts in such situations would be whether the IRS already received information under the John Doe summons, treaty request or other similar action and whether the information is sufficiently specific.

For example, the mere fact that the IRS served a John Doe summons, made a treaty request or has taken similar action does not make every member of the John Doe class or group identified in the treaty request or other action ineligible to participate.

On the other hand, if the IRS or the U.S. Department of Justice already obtained information under a John Doe summons, treaty request or other similar action that provides evidence of a specific taxpayer’s noncompliance with the tax laws or FBAR reporting requirements, that particular taxpayer will become ineligible for OVDP and Criminal Investigation’s Voluntary Disclosure Practice.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help With Offshore Voluntary Disclosure

Based on the analysis above, it is evident that a taxpayer concerned that a party subject to a John Doe summons, treaty request or similar action will provide information about him to the IRS should apply to make a voluntary disclosure as soon as possible.

This is why you should contact Sherayzen Law Office. Our experienced international tax law firm can help you with the entire voluntary disclosure process, including initial assessment of your FBAR liability, determination of available voluntary disclosure options, preparation of all of the required legal and tax documents, and rigorous representation of your interests during your negotiations with the IRS.