Posts

FBAR Financial Accounts Definition | International Tax Lawyer & Attorney

/in , , /by

In the realm of US international tax compliance, few topics are as crucial as the reporting of foreign financial accounts, particularly The Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Report (FBAR). This article focuses on one specific aspect of FBAR compliance: what accounts need to be disclosed on FBAR.  In particular, we will delve into the intricacies of the scope of the FBAR financial accounts definition.

Please, note that this article is an upgrade of an article that I published almost fifteen years ago.

FBAR Financial Accounts Definition: FBAR Background Information

FBAR is one of the most important US international tax compliance forms.  All US persons must file an FBAR if they have a financial interest in or signature authority over foreign financial accounts with an aggregate value exceeding $10,000 at any time during the calendar year (31 USC. § 5314; 31 C.F.R. § 1010.350).

FBAR filing is separate from income tax filing and has its own distinct requirements and deadlines. Also, a taxpayer must comply with his FBAR reporting obligations even if he already reported the same foreign financial accounts elsewhere (such as Form 8621 or Form 8938). US filers must file their FBARs (officially FinCEN Forms 114a) electronically through FinCEN’s BSA E-Filing System.

Additionally, FBAR has its own unique and very severe penalty system for noncompliance, including criminal penalties. This is why it is so important to understand what type of accounts should be disclosed on FBAR.

FBAR Financial Accounts Definition: Determining Reportable Accounts

When assessing whether an account qualifies as an FBAR foreign financial account, one should consider:

1. The account’s location. The account must be outside the United States – there is special definition for FBAR purposes for what this means.  I will not discuss the definition of “foreign accounts” in this article; instead I will only focus on what type of accounts need to be disclosed.

2. The account type. The main issue is whether this particular foreign asset falls within the definition of a “financial account” – this is the main topic of this article.

3. Your relationship to the account. In other words, do you have a financial interest in or signature authority over the foreign accounts in question.

4. The aggregate value of all foreign financial accounts. Generally, the accounts must exceed $10,000 in the aggregate at any point in the year. I will discuss in another article how this is calculated.

FBAR Financial Accounts Definition: Broad Scope

The definition of “financial account” for FBAR purposes is very broad. It is very important to understand that it is so broad that many taxpayers would not even normally consider certain arrangements as financial accounts.  

In general, if there is a value maintained as part of a fiduciary relationship with a financial institution, it is likely to be a reportable account on FBAR. See 75 Fed. Reg. at 8846. The IRS, however,has stated “an account is not established simply by conducting transactions such as wiring money or purchasing a money order where no relationship has otherwise been established.” Id.

FBAR Financial Accounts Definition: Bank, Securities and Investment Accounts

For the FBAR purposes, financial accounts include all checking, savings, brokerage and securities accounts. 75 Fed. Reg. 8846 defines “securities account” as “an account maintained with a person in the business of buying, selling, holding, or trading stock or other securities.” Id. Securities derivatives and other similar financial instruments held with a financial institution all fall within the definition of a reportable account. However, paper bonds, notes and stock certificates that are not held through a financial institutions are not considered as “financial accounts.”

The  FBAR financial accounts definition also applies to all demand, deposit and time deposit accounts (in other words, CD accounts and their equivalents).

FBAR Financial Accounts Definition: Debit Cards and Prepaid Credit Cards

31 C.F.R. § 1010.350(c) further expands the definition of “account” to foreign debit cards and prepaid credit cards. This definition of an account is an interesting one as even a slight overpayment of a credit card would make it a reportable account for FBAR purposes.

FBAR Financial Accounts Definition: Other Financial Accounts

31 C.F.R. § 1010.350(c)(3) introduces four additional categories of accounts that a filer must include on his FBARs:

  • Accounts with persons accepting deposits as a financial agency;
  • Insurance policies with cash value or annuity policies (for example, this definition includes Assurance Vie accounts in France, LIC policies in India and Prudential Life Insurance policies in Hong Kong);
  • Accounts with commodity futures or options brokers; and
  • Accounts with mutual funds or similar pooled investments (e.g. mutual funds owned through individual folios in India).

FBAR Financial Accounts Definition: Retirement Plans

Reporting retirement accounts on FBAR probably presents the biggest challenge to US taxpayers. Generally, all foreign retirement accounts would be need to be disclosed on FBAR unless they fall under an exception.

For example, certain US retirement plans (under IRC sections 401(a), 403(a), 403(b), 408, or 408A) are exempt from FBAR reporting. However, US filers need to disclose on their FBARs all of their Canadian RRSP accounts, Singaporean CPF accounts, Australian Superannuation accounts, Israeli retirement accounts and many other types of foreign retirement accounts that these filers may have.

As a separate note, the greatest difficulty concerning foreign retirement accounts is not even FBAR reporting, but potential other requirements as such Form 8938 and, most importantly, Form 3520 and even Form 3520-A.  The latter forms (Forms 3520 and 3520-A) are triggered if the foreign accounts are considered to be “foreign trusts”.  However, this decision to treat foreign accounts as trusts should be done with great care.

FBAR Financial Accounts Definition: Exceptions

Finally, certain categories of foreign financial accounts are exempt from FBAR reporting:

  1. Accounts in US military banking facilities serving US government installations abroad;
  2. Accounts over which most bank officers or employees have only signature authority (unless they have a personal financial interest); and
  3. Accounts over which officers or employees of publicly traded or large privately held US corporations have only signature authority, subject to specific conditions (31 C.F.R. § 1010.350(f)).

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional FBAR Help

FBAR noncompliance is one of the most common and one of the most fearsome problems facing US individual taxpayers with respect to their US international tax compliance. Sherayzen Law Office can help you resolve past FBAR noncompliance and bring your US tax affairs into full compliance with US tax laws.

We are a leading US international tax compliance and FBAR compliance firm.  This is our core specialty in which we have profound knowledge and extensive experience.

Contact us today to discuss your specific FBAR and international tax compliance needs with an experienced tax attorney!

Substantial Presence Test | US International Tax Lawyer & Attorney

/in , /by

The substantial presence test is one of the most important legal tests in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), because it determines whether a person is a US tax resident solely by virtue of his physical presence in the United States.  Additionally, this Test is essential to the determination of whether a person is a “US Person” for FBAR and Form 8938 purposes. In this article, I will explain the substantial presence test and highlight its main exceptions.

Substantial Presence Test: The Main Rule

In reality, there are two substantial presence tests; if either test is met, a person is considered to be a US tax resident unless an exception applies.

The first substantial presence test is met if a person is physically present in the United States for at least 183 days during the calendar year. 26 USC §7701(b)(3).  

The second substantial presence test (the so-called “lookback test”) is satisfied if two conditions are met: (1) the person is present in the United States for at least 31 days during the calendar year; and (2) the sum of the days on which this person was present in the United States during the current and the two preceding calendar years (multiplied by the fractions found in §7701(b)(3)(A)(ii)) equals to or exceeds 183 days. 26 USC 7701(b)(3)(A).  

Let’s discuss how exactly the lookback test works.  The way to determine to determine whether the 183-day test is met is to add: (a) all days present in the United States during the current calendar year (i.e. the year for which you are trying to determine whether the Substantial Presence Test is met) + (b) one-third of the days spent in the United States in the year immediately preceding the current year + (c) one-sixth of the days spent in the United States in the second year preceding the current calendar year. See 26 USC §7701(b)(3).

Substantial Presence Test: Presence

As one can easily see, a critical issue in the substantial presence test is to determine during which days a person is considered to be “present in the United States”. Pursuant to 26 USC §7701(b)(7)(A), a person is considered to be present in the United States if he is physically present in the United States at any time, however short, during the day, including the days of arrival and departure.

There are limited exceptions under 26 USC §§7701(b)(7)(B) and 7701(b)(7)(C) for: commuters from Canada and Mexico, foreign vessel crew members and persons who travel between two foreign countries with a less than a 24-hour layover in the United States.

Substantial Presence Test: Exempt Persons

In addition to the exceptions above, the Internal Revenue Code contains a large number of categories of persons exempt from the Substantial Presence Test. 26 USC §§7701(b). In other words, the days that these “exempt persons” spend in the United States do not count toward the Substantial Presence Test. Here is a most common list of exempt persons:

Foreign government-related individuals and their immediate family (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(B))

Teachers and trainees and their immediate family (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(C))

Foreign students on F-, J-, M- or Q-visas (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(D))

Professional athletes temporarily in the US for charitable sporting events (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(A)(iv))

Individuals unable to leave the US due to medical conditions (26 USC §7701(b)(3)(D)(ii))

A couple of notes on these categories. First, for the “professional athletes who are temporarily present in the United States to compete in a charitable sporting event” category, the sports event must meet the following requirements for the exemption to apply: (1) it must be organized primarily to benefit §503(c)(3) tax-exempt organization; (2) the net proceeds from the event must be contributed to the benefitted tax-exempt organization; and (3) the event must be carried out substantially by volunteers.

Second, concerning the last category “foreign aliens who are unable to leave the United States because of a medical condition”, Rev. Proc. 2020-20 expanded this medical condition exception to include “COVID-19 Medical Condition Travel Exception” for eligible individuals unable to leave United States during “COVID-19 Emergency Period”. The term COVID-19 Emergency Period is a single period of up to 60 consecutive calendar days selected by an individual starting on or after February 1, 2020 and on or before April 1, 2020 during which the individual is physically present in the United States on each day. An Eligible Individual may claim the COVID-19 Medical Condition Travel Exception in addition to, or instead of, claiming other exceptions from the substantial presence test for which the individual is eligible.

Substantial Presence Test: “Closer Connection” Exception

In addition to exceptions and exemptions listed above, there is one more highly important exception to the Substantial Presence Test called the “Closer Connection” Exception. Under 26 USC §§7701(b)(3)(C), a person is exempt from the application of the Substantial Presence Test if the following four conditions are met:

1) the person is present less than 183 days in the United States during the current year;

2) the person can establish that, during the current year, he had a tax home in a foreign country (obviously, “tax home” is a term of art that has its special significance for the purposes of the “closer connection” exception;

3) the person has a “closer connection” to that foreign country than to the United States; and

4) the person has not applied for a lawful permanent residency status in the United States.

I have addressed the Closer Connection Exception in detail here.

Substantial Presence Test:  Tax Treaty Exception

Tax treaties provide another exception. IRC §7701(b)(6) and Treas. Reg. §301.7701(b)-7 provide that an individual who meets the substantial presence test but is a resident of a treaty country under a tie-breaker provision of an income tax treaty may elect to be treated as a nonresident alien for US tax purposes. This election is made on Form 8833, Treaty-Based Return Position Disclosure.

It’s important to note that while this treaty election can significantly affect an individual’s US tax obligations, it does not negate the fact that the individual met the substantial presence test. This distinction is crucial for certain reporting requirements, such as FBAR and Form 8938.

Substantial Presence Test: Closer Connection Exception and Treaty Election vs. FBAR

One of the most common pitfalls of US international tax compliance relates to a situation where the substantial presence test is met but either a closer connection exception is claimed or an election is made to be taxed as a resident of another country.  In such a situation, even many practitioners incorrectly conclude that the taxpayer is not required to file FBAR.  This is not the case; even where a tax treaty foreign tax residency election or a closer connection exception claim is made, the taxpayer may still need to file an FBAR. 76 Fed. Reg. 10,234, 10,238; IRM 4.26.16.2.1.2(6) (11-06-15).

I will discuss this FBAR exception to the closer connection and tax treaty exceptions in another article.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help With US International Tax Law

Understanding the nuances of the US international tax law, including the Substantial Presence Test with its numerous exceptions and its implications for both tax residency and FBAR reporting, is essential for individuals who spend significant time in the United States. Given the complexity of these rules and their potential US tax impact, you need qualified professional help to properly navigate these complex rules.

This is why you need to contact Sherayzen Law Office.  Our international tax team is highly knowledgeable and experienced in this area of law. We have helped hundreds of US taxpayers to determine their US tax residency status, and we can help you!  

Contact us today to schedule your confidential consultation!

2024 FBAR Civil Penalties | FBAR International Tax Lawyer & Attorney

/in , /by

This article is an update of prior articles on the FBAR Civil Penalties. Since the US Congress mandated the IRS to adjust FBAR civil penalties for inflation on an annual basis, this article discusses the year 2024 FBAR Civil Penalties.

2024 FBAR Civil Penalties: Overview of the FBAR Penalty System

FinCEN Form 114, the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (commonly known as “FBAR”), has always had a very complex, multi-layered system of penalties, which has grown even more complicated over the years. These penalties can be grouped into four categories: criminal, willful, non-willful and negligent.

Of course, the most dreaded penalties are FBAR criminal penalties. Not only is there a criminal fine of up to $500,000, but, in some cases, a person can be sentenced to 10 years in prison for FBAR violations (and these two criminal penalties can be imposed simultaneously). Since the focus of this article is on FBAR civil penalties.

The next category of penalties are FBAR civil penalties imposed for the willful failure to file an FBAR. These penalties are imposed per each violation – i.e. on each account per year, potentially going back six years (the FBAR statute of limitations is six years).

The third category of penalties are FBAR penalties imposed for a non-willful failure to file an FBAR or a filing of an incorrect FBAR. These penalties can be imposed on US persons who do not even know that FBAR exists.

Finally, with respect to business entities, a penalty can be imposed for a negligent failure to file an FBAR or a filing of an incorrect FBAR.

It is important to note that FBAR has its own reasonable cause exception that may be used to fight the assessment of any of the aforementioned civil penalties. Moreover, each of these penalty categories has numerous levels of penalty mitigation that a tax attorney may utilize to lower his client’s FBAR civil penalties.

2024 FBAR Civil Penalties: Penalties Prior to November 2 2015

Prior to November 2, 2015, FBAR penalties were not adjusted for inflation and stayed flat at the levels mandated by Congress. Let’s go over each category of penalties prior to inflation adjustment.

As of November 1, 2015, Willful FBAR penalties were up to $100,000 or 50% of the highest balance of an account, whichever is greater, per violation. Again, a violation meant a failure to correctly report an account in any year. Non-willful FBAR penalties were up to $10,000 per violation per year; per US Supreme Court’s decision last year, the penalty should have been imposed on a per form (not per account) basis. Finally, FBAR penalties for negligence were up to $500 per violation; if, however, there was a pattern of negligence, the negligence penalties could increase ten times up to $50,000 per violation.

2024 FBAR Civil Penalties: Inflation Adjustment

The situation changed dramatically in 2015. As a result of the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (“2015 Inflation Adjustment Act”), Congress mandated federal agents to: (1) adjust the amounts of civil monetary penalties with an initial “catch-up” adjustment; and (2) make subsequent annual adjustments for inflation. The inflation adjustment applied only to civil penalties.

The “catch-up” adjustment meant a huge increase in penalties, because federal agencies were required to update all of these penalties from the time of their enactment (or the last year Congress adjusted the penalties) through November of 2015. This meant that, in 2015, the penalties jumped to account for all accumulated multi-year inflation. The catch-up adjustment was limited to two and a half times of the original penalty.

Fortunately, the Congress adjusted FBAR penalties in 2004 and the “catch-up” adjustment did not have to go back to the 1970s. It still meant a very large (about 25%) increase in FBAR civil penalties, but it was not as dramatic as some other federal penalties.

2024 FBAR Civil Penalties: Bifurcation of FBAR Penalty System

The biggest problem with the inflation adjustment, however, was the fact that it further complicated the already dense multi-layered FBAR system of civil penalties – FBAR penalties became dependent on the timing of a violation and IRS penalty assessment. In essence, the 2015 Inflation Adjustment Act split the FBAR penalty into two distinct parts.

The first part applies to FBAR violations that occurred on or before November 2, 2015. The old pre-2015 FBAR penalties described above applies to these violations irrespective of when the IRS actually assesses the penalties for these violations. The last FBAR violations definitely eligible for the old statutory penalties are those that were made concerning 2014 FBAR which was due on June 30, 2015. The statute of limitations for the 2014 FBAR ran out on June 30, 2021.

The second part applies to all FBAR violations that occurred after November 2, 2015. For all of these violations, the exact amount of penalties will depend on the timing of the IRS penalty assessment, not when the FBAR violation actually occurred. In other words, if an FBAR violation occurred on October 15, 2017 and the IRS assessed FBAR penalties June 17, 2021, the IRS would use the inflation-adjusted FBAR penalties as of the year 2021, not October 15, 2017.

2024 FBAR Civil Penalties: Penalties Assessed On or After January 25, 2024

Now that we understand the history of FBAR penalties, we can specifically discuss the 2024 FBAR Civil penalties. The first thing to understand is that we are talking about penalties assessed by the IRS on or after January 25, 2024; prior to that date, the 2023 FBAR civil penalties were still effective.

The 2024 Willful FBAR penalty imposed under 31 U.S.C. §5321(a)(5)(C)(i)(I) is $161,166 per violation. Per last year’s court decisions, the term “violation” in the context of willful FBAR penalties means on a “per account for each year” basis described above.

The 2024 Non-Willful FBAR penalty imposed under 31 U.S.C. §5321(a)(5)(B) is $16,117 per violation. The term “violation” in the context of non-willful FBAR penalties at this point has been settled to mean “per form” (rather than per-account) basis.

The 2024 Negligence FBAR penalty imposed under 31 U.S.C. §5321(a)(6)(A) is $1,394; if there is a pattern of negligence under 31 U.S.C. §5321(a)(6)(B), then the penalty goes up to $108,489.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help With Your Prior FBAR Noncompliance

Sherayzen Law Office is a leader in US international tax law and FBAR compliance. We have successfully helped hundreds of clients from over eighty countries resolve their prior FBAR noncompliance, including through various voluntary disclosure programs (such as Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures, Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures, Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures, et cetera). We can help you!

Contact Us Today to Schedule Your Confidential Consultation!

Happy New Year 2024 From International Tax Law Firm Sherayzen Law Office!!!

/in , /by

Dear clients, followers, readers and colleagues:

Mr. Eugene Sherayzen, an international tax attorney, and the entire international tax team of Sherayzen Law Office, Ltd. wishes you a very Happy New Year 2024!!!

Dear clients and prospective clients, in the New Year 2024, you can continue to rely on Sherayzen Law Office for:

  1. Resolution of your prior FBAR, FATCA and other US international tax noncompliance through offshore voluntary disclosure, including Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures (SDOP), Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures (SFOP), Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures, Delinquent International Information Return Submission Procedures, IRS Voluntary Disclosure Practice and Reasonable Cause Disclosures;
  2. Help with your IRS audits and examination, including audits of: your prior SDOP and SFOP submissions (as well as other voluntary disclosure options) and your annual international tax compliance. We can also help you fight the imposition of IRS penalties for prior international tax noncompliance, including FBAR penalties, Form 8938 penalties, Form 3520 and 3520-A penalties, Form 5471 penalties, Form 5472 penalties, Form 8865 penalties, Form 926 penalties, et cetera;
  3. Preparation of your annual US international tax compliance, including the reporting of foreign income and preparation of FBAR, FATCA Form 8938 and other US international tax compliance forms such as: Forms 3520, 3520-A, 5471, 8621, 8865, 8938 and 926 and
  4. Your international tax planning (inbound and outbound), including individual and business tax planning, We intend to continue to help US firms with conducting business overseas, US owners of foreign businesses and foreign businesses who wish to expand their presence to the United States (including real estate investors).

In resolving all of your current US international tax issues, we will continue to employ ethical creativity, diligence, professionalism and many years of experience with helping other clients. We will also continue to utilize an individual, customized approach, understanding each client’s particular situation.

In 2024, the US international tax compliance requirements will likely grow even more complex, detailed and extensive. The IRS will continue to demand more and more information from US taxpayers, employing its expanding number of revenue agents to enforce US tax laws across the globe and especially in the United States.

In order to deal with this ever-increasing US tax compliance burden, you will need the professional help of Sherayzen Law Office. In this New Year 2024, we can help you!

Your professional US international tax help is but a phone call away from you! Contact us today to schedule a confidential consultation in this New Year 2024!

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2024 EVERYONE!!!