Retaining Savannah International Tax Attorney: Location Choice

/in , /by

One of the important issues that US taxpayers with undisclosed foreign accounts face is whether it is better to retain an international tax attorney in Savannah or in Minneapolis if you live in Savannah, Georgia? If you were to search “Savannah international tax attorney”, Sherayzen Law Office, Ltd. (which is based in Minneapolis) is likely to come out on the first page together with other international tax attorneys in Savannah. The question is: should the geographical proximity of an attorney play a role in the retainer decision?

The answer depends on many factors. On the one hand, if you are looking for a sales tax attorney, then you may not have a choice but to find a local attorney. This is because local law and procedure would govern in this case, and an attorney familiar with local sales tax issues would be the best choice for handling a sales tax case. Of course, even in this case, there are exceptions because, sometimes, the unique qualities of an outside attorney are so desirable by the client that the court may accede in temporarily admitting this outside lawyer to practice just for one case.

One the other end of the spectrum, if you are searching for a Savannah international tax attorney because you have undeclared offshore accounts, then the knowledge of local law and procedure are likely to be of very little value. Instead, the experience and knowledge of an attorney in his area of offshore voluntary disclosures will become the most important factors in retaining an international tax attorney.

What if you have an international tax lawyer in Savannah, do you still want to consider an attorney in Minneapolis? The answer is “yes” – for two reasons. First, international tax attorneys differ in their natural ability to identify problems and find solutions, creativity, advocacy and many other factors. Therefore, there is no reason to stay away from a better international tax attorney in Minneapolis even if there is a lawyer in Savannah.

Second, in addition to differences in personal qualities, the experience of the international tax attorney in the area of offshore voluntary disclosures and the ability to analyze the specific subject matter of the undisclosed accounts in the broader context of the voluntary disclosure (including potential strategies that may become available due to client’s specific facts) are very important factors in retaining the attorney and should override the attorney’s particular geography.

What is a fairly unique feature about Sherayzen Law Office is that we can handle the entire case internally – both, the legal and the accounting sides of it. Most Savannah international tax attorneys in this area of law do not do that and rely on the outside accountant to provide such additional services. The outsourcing approach has various disadvantages, including potential leak of information, lack of close coordination between both sides of the case, increased possibility of missed opportunities and absence of the unity of goal among the professionals who are preoccupied with their respective areas only. The approach adopted by Sherayzen Law Office is aimed to reduce and eliminate such problems.

So, the next time you search for a Savannah international tax attorney, keep these issues in mind while retaining an attorney from Minneapolis or any other city.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help With International Tax Issues

If you have any international tax issues with respect to undeclared foreign financial accounts or international tax compliance in general, contact Sherayzen Law Office for comprehensive legal and tax help.

Swiss Program for Banks and Undisclosed Bank Accounts in Israel

/in , /by

With the DOJ Program for Swiss Banks raging in Switzerland, an obvious question arises about whether this program would be applicable in other places, most prominently, to undisclosed bank accounts in Israel. It is my opinion, as an international tax attorney, that the DOJ will attempt to apply its Swiss Program for Banks to other places, including undisclosed bank accounts in Israel.

Background Information on the Program for Swiss Banks

On August 29, 2013, the DOJ announced a new initiative – The Program for Non-Prosecution Agreements or Non-Target Letters for Swiss Banks (Program) – which is intended to allow Swiss banks to bring themselves into compliance with DOJ requirements and avoid any US enforcement action in exchanged for detailed disclosures and, in some cases, the payment of monetary penalties.

In essence, this is a voluntary disclosure program, only for Swiss Banks. Under the Program, the Swiss banks are required to turn over a vast amount of extensive and detailed information regarding its US account holders, including list the value of accounts greater than $50,000 during three separate periods; on an account by account basis, the highest value during the period beginning August 1, 2008; the number of persons affiliated with the account and their functions; whether the account was held in a structure (a foreign corporation, foundation, etc.), et cetera.

In return, the banks that participate in the Program can use it to effectively close-out any potential U.S. compliance issues and prevent future criminal prosecution of the banks.

Benefits of the Program for the IRS

The Program offers tremendous benefits to the IRS; I will just list the chief long-term benefits. First and foremost, it is unrealistic for the IRS and the DOJ to investigate every single bank in Switzerland by itself. In essence, the Program allows the IRS to achieve this goal by using the banks themselves to investigate whether they are compliance with U.S. tax laws.

Second, the Program will provide the IRS with a tremendous amount of information regarding the schemes and techniques used by non-compliant U.S. taxpayers and their advisors (as well as the identify of these advisors). This will allow the IRS to develop the procedures to quickly identifying and investigating future potential non-compliance schemes.

Finally, the Program has the potential to identify all of the non-compliance U.S. taxpayers with undisclosed accounts in Switzerland as well as to trace whether these funds were taken out of Switzerland and moved elsewhere, especially to undisclosed bank accounts in Israel (which is already a major target for the DOJ).

As I mentioned before, there are many more other advantageous to the program; among them: establishing the precedent for future use of a similar program in another country, focusing the investigation on particular individuals and banks, and the high publicity of the program should force banks in other countries to step-up their compliance with U.S. tax laws (in case a similar approach is adopted in their countries).

The Program Is Ready to be Applied to Other Countries, including Israel

Because of its tremendous utility to the DOJ and the IRS, I believe it is highly possible that the Program will be applied in other countries, though, most likely in a modified form. The exact form of the Program is likely to be dependent on the type of the FATCA treaty that was signed between the United States and the target country as well as the target country’s government and its willingness to give in to the U.S. demands for transparency.

It is also not inconceivable that the Program will be eventually applied worldwide so that every non-compliant bank would have an opportunity to enter it. However, it is perhaps a bit premature to discuss when such a program would be enacted and what shape it would take.

The likelihood that the Program would be applied to undisclosed bank accounts in Israel is very high. First, Israel is already a focus of several DOJ investigations. Second, the IRS can already confirm (and will find more evidence of this happening after the banks submit the required information under the Program) that numerous bank accounts were closed in Switzerland by Israeli-Americans and moved elsewhere. Finally, it appears that the Israeli government would likely cooperate with the U.S. government in this area.

High Risks for U.S. Persons with Undisclosed Bank Accounts in Israel

At this point, the situation has grown intolerably dangerous for U.S. taxpayers with undisclosed bank accounts in Israel. Not only are they already potentially subject to the IRS investigation, but, if the Program is applied in Israel, there will be no safe haven for non-compliant U.S. taxpayers with undisclosed bank accounts in Israel.

In such a situation, the most prudent step for U.S. taxpayers with undisclosed bank accounts in Israel would be to retain an international tax attorney experienced in offshore voluntary disclosures in order to conduct some type of a voluntary disclosure before it is too late.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help with Undisclosed Bank Accounts in Israel

If you have undisclosed bank accounts in Israel, you should contact Sherayzen Law Office to conduct your offshore voluntary disclosure. Our firm consists of international tax professionals highly experienced in the offshore voluntary disclosure matters. We will thoroughly analyze your case, determine the available voluntary disclosure options for your offshore assets, and meticulously implement the chosen plan of action (including preparation of all legal documents and tax forms). Contact Sherayzen Law Office

2014 Individual Income Tax Rates

/in , /by

The IRS recently announced the 2014 individual income tax rates with inflation adjustments wit respect to each tax bracket. Remember, since the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was signed into law on January 2, 2013, a new tax bracket of 39.4% appeared. Also, note that the 2014 individual income tax rates listed below do not include other taxes such as those imposed on investment income by the new health care laws. Finally, it is important to remember that the default PFIC regime calculations do not depend on your personal tax rate.

As adjusted for inflation, the following marginal income tax rates will apply to individuals in the tax year 2014:

Filing Single

10% $0 – $9,075
15% $9,076 – $36,900
25% $36,901 – $89,350
28% $89,351 – $186,350
33% $186,351 – $405,100
35% $405,101 – $406,750
39.6% $406,751 and greater

Notice the small range of the 35% tax bracket.

Filing Married Filing Jointly and Surviving Spouses

10% $0 – $18,150
15% $18,151 – $73,800
25% $73,801 – $148,850
28% $148,851 – $226,850
33% $226,851 – $405,100
35% $405,101 – $457,600
39.6% $457,601 and greater

Filing Married Filing Separately

10% $0 – $9,075
15% $9,076 – $36,900
25% $36,901 – $74,425
28% $74,426 – $113,425
33% $113,426– $202,550
35% $202,551 – $228,800
39.6% $228,801 and greater

Filing Head of Household

10% $0 – $12,950
15% $12,951 – $49,400
25% $49,401 – $127,550
28% $127,551 – $206,600
33% $206,601 – $405,100
35% $405,101 – $432,200
39.6% $432,201 and greater

2013 Minnesota Income Tax Rates

/in , /by

Below, I list the information provided by the Minnesota Department of Revenue with respect to 2013 Minnesota Income Tax Rates. Notice, the new 9.85% tax bracket that was created last year and introduced a radical new change to 2013 Minnesota Income Tax Rates. Taxpayers who file estimated taxes may use this information to plan and pay taxes beginning in April 2013.

Single

For income between $ 0- 24,270: 5.35%
For income between $ 24,271-79,730: 7.05%
For income between $ 79,731-150,000: $7.85%
For income $150,001 and above: 9.85%

Married Filing Jointly

For income between $ 0-35,480: 5.35%
For income between $35,481-140,960: 7.05%
For income between $140,961-250,000: 7.85%
For income $250,000 and above: 9.85%

Married Filing Separately

For income between $ 0-17,140: 5.35%
For income between $17,741-70,480: 7.05%
For income between $ 70,481-125,000: $7.85%
For income $125,001 and above: 9.85%

Head of Household

For income between $ 0- 29,880: 5.35%
For income between $ 29,881- 120,070: 7.05%
For income between $ 120,071- 200,000: $7.85%
For income $200,001 and above: 9.85%

2014 Foreign Earned Income Exclusion

/in , /by

On November 18, 2013, the IRS announced that the foreign earned income exclusion amount under §911(b)(2)(D)(i) is going to be $99,200 for tax year 2014. This up from $97,600 in 2013 and $95,100 in 2012.

Generally, if a qualified individual meets certain requirements of I.R.C. §911, he may exclude part or all of his foreign earned income from taxable gross income for the U.S. income tax purposes. This income may still be subject to U.S. Social Security taxes.

Remember, if your overseas earnings are above $99,200 for the tax year 2013, then you may be subject to U.S. income taxation on the excess amount (i.e. amount exceeding the 2014 foreign earned income exclusion).

It is also important to note, despite the income tax exclusion, your tax bracket will still be the same as if you were taxed on the whole amount (i.e. as if you had not claimed the foreign earned income exclusion). For most U.S. expatriates, this means that the tax bracket is likely to start at 25% or higher. If you are self-employed, however, your situation may differ from this description.

Furthermore, it is worth noting that additional amount of earnings may also be excluded under the foreign housing exclusion.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office For Foreign Earned Income Exclusion Legal Help

If you are a U.S. taxpayer living abroad or you are planning to accept a job overseas, contact us to discuss your tax situation. Our experienced tax law office will guide you through the complex maze of U.S. tax reporting requirements, help you make sure that you are in full compliance with U.S. tax laws, and help you take advantage of the relevant provisions of the Internal Revenue Code to make sure that you do not over-pay your taxes in the United States.