Obtaining Private Letter Rulings

/in , /by

At certain times, tax planning may involve taking a position on a tax return that is uncertain, or even controversial. If the position involves a potentially large liability, taxpayers may be left with the undesirable choices of either taking a risk in reporting the position or deciding not to and paying a much larger tax.

Thankfully, in some instances, the IRS allows for a way to receive clarification on a specific tax position for individual taxpayers, called Private Letter Rulings. The basic mechanism of obtaining a Private Letter Ruling is the essence of this essay.

Private Letter Rulings are issued by the National Office of the IRS upon request by individual taxpayers. Basically, Private Letter Rulings state how a specified tax position will be treated by the IRS if it is taken on a tax return. Hence, this process is one of the best ways to ensure proper, safe tax planning on otherwise potentially risky positions. The IRS will only issue letter rulings based upon actual transactions (even if they have not been completed yet); mere hypothetical scenarios will not qualify. While the IRS is not legally bound by letter rulings, in general, it has honored the determinations made to specific taxpayers.

A Private Letter Ruling that is issued to an individual taxpayer must be attached to the tax return filed for the year that the position in question is reported. In certain circumstances, the IRS may issue subsequent determinations to other taxpayers, based upon almost the same set of facts, that seem to contradict the earlier letter ruling. Generally, in such cases, the new ruling will not be applied retroactively to the original taxpayer who requested a letter ruling.

Furthermore, the IRS is required to make Private Letter Rulings available for the general public, with identifying individual details removed. In most cases, a Private Letter Ruling only applies to the individual taxpayer who request it. For the purposes of avoiding accuracy-related penalties, however, Private Letter Rulings issued after 1984 may be used as substantial authority by other non-requesting taxpayers.

Because a letter ruling represents the current IRS view of a tax issue, letter rulings may be superseded by new case law. Keep in mind, however, that there are limitations with respect to the IRS revocation or modification of a letter ruling sent to an individual taxpayer.

Of course, as most things in life, the benefits of a Private Letter Ruling come with certain costs. There is a fairly steep fee charged by the IRS for making a request. In addition, the legal fees involved in obtaining a Private Letter Ruling are often comparable to an administrative appeal or an arbitration case (depending on the complexity of your case). Also, there are certain prescribed areas of the law that the IRS will not rule on for Private Letter Purposes. The same applies to requests that involve only issues of fact. In fact, the complexity of obtaining the Private Ruling is such that your best course of action is to retain a tax attorney if you seek to minimize your potential tax liability and audit risk by requesting a letter ruling.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office For Help In Obtaining a Private Letter Ruling

Obtaining a Private Letter Ruling usually involves complex issues, and this articles only provides a very general background information that should not be relied upon in making the determination of your specific situation. Rather, if you would like to consider obtaining a Private Letter Ruling from the IRS, you should contact Sherayzen Law Office for legal help. Our experienced tax firm will help you determine whether your case qualifies for a Private Letter Ruling, whether this is the best course of action available, and provide rigorous, ethical and affordable IRS representation.

IRS Announces 2012 Standard Mileage Rates

/in , /by

On December 9, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service issued the 2012 optional standard mileage rates used to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes.

Beginning on January 1, 2012, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be:

  • 55.5 cents per mile for business miles driven;
  • 23 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes;
  • 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations.

The rate for business miles driven is unchanged from the mid-year adjustment that became effective on July 1, 2011. The medical and moving rate has been reduced by 0.5 cents per mile.

The standard mileage rate for business is based on an annual study of the fixed and variable costs of operating an automobile. The rate for medical and moving purposes is based on the variable costs as determined by the same study.

Taxpayers always have the option of calculating the actual costs of using their vehicle rather than using the standard mileage rates.

A taxpayer may not use the business standard mileage rate for a vehicle after using any depreciation method under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) or after claiming a Section 179 deduction for that vehicle. In addition, the business standard mileage rate cannot be used for more than four vehicles used simultaneously.

These and other requirements for a taxpayer to use a standard mileage rate to calculate the amount of a deductible business, moving, medical or charitable expense are in Rev. Proc. 2010-51.

Notice 2012-01 contains the standard mileage rates, the amount a taxpayer must use in calculating reductions to basis for depreciation taken under the business standard mileage rate, and the maximum standard automobile cost that a taxpayer may use in computing the allowance under a fixed and variable rate plan.

Alternative Minimum Tax Foreign Tax Credit

/in , /by

US persons are taxed on their worldwide income, but are allowed a foreign tax credit (FTC) for foreign taxes paid. In most cases, the FTC gives taxpayers a dollar-for-dollar credit against their US tax liability.

However, the FTC may be limited for Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) purposes in order to ensure that a taxpayer’s US liability is only reduced on foreign-source income. This article will briefly examine some of the basic elements of the Alternative Minimum Tax Foreign Tax Credit (AMTFTC).

Alternative Minimum Tax Foreign Tax Credit Calculation

The AMT for individuals in calculated on Form 6251. Taxpayers who need to determine whether they will have an AMTFTC, will first need to calculate their foreign tax credit for their regular tax. Once this is done, line 34 of the form should be filled in, and if the amount on this line is greater than or equal to the amount on line 31 (see IRS instructions for specifics), then a zero would be entered on line 35 (the AMT line), and the instructions should be reviewed to determine whether the form will need to be attached to the tax return. If the AMT is not owed, line 32 of the form will still need to be filled in, in order to determine whether a taxpayer has an AMTFTC carryback or carryforward.

If the AMT is owed, the FTC may be limited by IRS rules. In general, for purposes of calculating the AMTFTC limitation, foreign-source AMT income (AMTI) is divided by total AMTI. This amount is then multiplied by the tentative minimum tax (and not the regular tax). This calculation must be determined for each separate basket type of income (i.e. general and passive income). FTCs that are not used because of the AMTFTC may be carried forward.

Taxpayers may elect to use regular foreign-source income in the numerator of this equation, provided that it does not exceed total AMTI.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office For Tax Help With Determining AMT, FTC and AMTFTC

Determing your Foreign Tax Credit and Alternative Minumum Tax can involve complex issues and this article only attempts to provide a very general background information that should not be relied upon in making the determination of your specific situation. Rather, you should contact Sherayzen Law Office for legal help with this issue. Our tax firm will help you determine your AMT, FTC and AMTFTC for the relevant tax years as well as provide sound tax planning for the future.

Post-OVDI Voluntary Disclosure of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts

/in , /by

Since the enrollment into the 2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (“OVDI”) closed on September 9, 2011, I have been asked repeatedly by new and prospective clients about their post-OVDI options – i.e. is there a voluntary disclosure option for clients who were not able to enroll into the program by the September 9 deadline?

The answer is – Yes! The IRS traditional voluntary disclosure is now an option for clients who wish to come forward with the voluntary disclosure of their foreign assets and foreign income.

Historic Relationship Between Traditional Voluntary Disclosure and Amnesty Initiatives

In order to understand this option, it is important to understand the relationship between the OVDI and the IRS traditional voluntary disclosure. The traditional voluntary disclosure has existed for a very long time, much earlier than the 2011 OVDI or the 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (“OVDP”) or the 2004 Last Chance Compliance Initiative (“LCCI”) or even the very first 2003 Offshore Voluntary Compliance Initiative (“OVCI”).

The four offshore amnesty programs I just mentioned really represent a special type of the voluntary disclosure program that offers advantages to certain individuals who otherwise would be subject to much higher penalties under the traditional voluntary disclosure program. Every time one of the amnesty initiatives. It is important to emphasize, however, that, as the time goes, the advantages for some categories of taxpayers diminish with each subsequent amnesty initiative (while new categories of taxpayers are given additional incentives).

For example, the OVDI offered more penalty categories for the purposes of the offshore penalty calculation (i.e. FBAR penalties) than OVDP. On the other hand, the way OVDI calculates its penalty made the program less advantageous than OVDP for some categories of taxpayers.

Thus, every time there is an amnesty initiative, the traditional voluntary disclosure takes a back seat and limits itself mostly to the domestic voluntary disclosure.

OVDI and Traditional Voluntary Dislcosure

The same story occurred in 2011. Once the OVDI initiative was announced on February 8, 2011, the traditional voluntary disclosure stopped accepting applications involving offshore accounts. Rather, it limited itself to the voluntary disclosures involving U.S.-source income. After a short transitional period of time, all voluntary disclosures involving foreign income were diverted solely to the OVDI program. The updates of June 2, 2011, clarified many such changes, including the opt-out options.

Post-OVDI Voluntary Disclosure

When the OVDI program closed on September 9, 2011, the IRS Traditional Voluntary Disclosure was reinstated to its full size and started to accept the voluntary disclosure applications. However, it is yet to be seen just how much the procedures of the traditional voluntary disclosure have been impacted by the OVDI. At this point, it is clear that the streamlining of applications and the processing structure that existed under the OVDI are impacting the current procedures of the Traditional Voluntary Disclosure program.

On the other hand, substantively, it is also clear that the pre-OVDI FBAR penalty structure has been reinstated with its differentiation between willful and non-willful violations.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office To Conduct Voluntary Disclosure of Foreign Assets and Foreign Income

If you would like to enroll into the IRS Traditional Voluntary Disclosure program or if you would like to consult an attorney about it, contact Sherayzen Law Office by email [email protected] or telephone (952) 500-8159. Our firm’s core tax compliance practice is to help people like you to properly conduct voluntary disclosures.

Our international tax firm is experienced in these matters and will guide you through every stage of this complex process, from initial acceptance into the program (pre-clearance) to strategy development, document submission (amendment of tax returns, FBAR drafting, and other documents), aggressive ethical advocacy, and penalty negotiation with the IRS.

The IRS has professionals working on its side and so should you. Contact Sherayzen Law Office for experienced and professional legal representation!