Posts

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions | Minneapolis Minnesota International Tax Lawyer

/in , /by

In a previous article, I discussed in detail the Substantial Presence Test and I mentioned that there are a number of exceptions to the Test. This means that, even though a person met the requirements of the substantial presence test, he can still avoid the resident alien status for US income tax purposes based on a specific exception.  In this brief essay, I will summarize these Substantial Present Test exceptions.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Closer Connection

The first set of exceptions includes the Closer Connection Exception and the Tax Treaty Exception.  Let’s deal with each one separately.

Under the Closer Connection Exception, an individual who meets the requirements of the Substantial Presence Test is able to escape being a US tax resident for income tax purposes if he can demonstrate a “closer connection” to a foreign country.

In another article, I detail all of the requirements of the Closer Connection Exception.  Here I would like to restate the main requirements under IRC § 7701(b)(3)(B) and Treas. Reg. § 301.7701(b)-2(a):

1.The individual must be present in the United States for fewer than 183 days in the current calendar year;

2.The individual must maintain a tax home in a foreign country during the year;

3.The individual must have a closer connection to that foreign country than to the United States; and

4. An individual must be an eligible individual.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Tax Treaty Exception

The Tax Treaty Exception is very similar to the Closer Connection Exception, but it is based on a completely different concept – the tie-breaker rules of a tax treaty.

 IRC §7701(b)(6) and Treas. Reg. §301.7701(b)-7 provide that an individual who meets the substantial presence test but is a resident of a treaty country under a tie-breaker provision of an income tax treaty may elect to be treated as a nonresident alien for US income tax purposes. This individual will need to make an election on Form 8833, Treaty-Based Return Position Disclosure.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Eight Categories of Exempt Individuals

While the Closer Connection and the Tax Treaty Exceptions deal with someone who actually met the Substantial Presence Test and is trying to escape the its consequences, the second set of exceptions exempts the days spent in the United States from the consideration of the Substantial Presence Test so that the exempt individual never meets the Substantial Presence Test.  This is a very important distinction, because it may greatly affect one’s obligations concerning US international information returns.

Here is a list of categories of exempt persons:

Foreign government-related individuals and their immediate family (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(B))

Teachers and trainees and their immediate family (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(C))

Foreign students on F-, J-, M- or Q-visas (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(D))

Professional athletes temporarily in the US for charitable sporting events (26 USC §7701(b)(5)(A)(iv))

Individuals unable to leave the US due to medical conditions (26 USC §7701(b)(3)(D)(ii))

commuters from Canada and Mexico 26 USC §§7701(b)(7)(B)

foreign vessel crew members 7701(b)(7)(D) and

and persons who travel between two foreign countries with a less than a 24-hour layover in the United States 7701(b)(7)(C)

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Note on the Professional Athletes Exception

The “professional athletes who are temporarily present in the United States to compete in a charitable sporting event” category  has very specific requirements for the sport events in order for exemption to apply.  First, the sports event must be organized primarily to benefit §503(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Second, the net proceeds from the event must be contributed to the benefitted tax-exempt organization. Finally, the event must be carried out substantially by volunteers.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Note on the Medical Condition Exception

Concerning the last category “foreign aliens who are unable to leave the United States because of a medical condition”, Rev. Proc. 2020-20 expanded this medical condition exception to include “COVID-19 Medical Condition Travel Exception” for eligible individuals unable to leave United States during “COVID-19 Emergency Period”. The term COVID-19 Emergency Period is a single period of up to 60 consecutive calendar days selected by an individual starting on or after February 1, 2020 and on or before April 1, 2020 during which the individual is physically present in the United States on each day. An Eligible Individual may claim the COVID-19 Medical Condition Travel Exception in addition to, or instead of, claiming other exceptions from the substantial presence test for which the individual is eligible.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Eligibility is on Day-by-Day Basis

The eligibility for any particular exception is determined on a day-by-day basis. If an alien ceases to qualify for any of these exceptions because of a change in circumstances but remains in the United States, he must count the days present in the United States for the purposes of the substantial presence.  The count must start from the very day that he no longer qualifies for the exception.

Substantial Presence Test Exceptions: Immediate Family

Immediate family can be derivatively eligible for a substantial present test exception only for the following categories: foreign government-related individual, a teacher or trainee (J-visa or Q-visa holder) and a student (F-visa or M-visa holder).  The family of the individuals in the other five categories may only claim an exception based on their own particular facts and circumstances.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help with US International Tax Law

US international tax law is incredibly complex.  This is why you need to contact Sherayzen Law Office for professional help.  Sherayzen Law Office is a highly-experienced leader in US international tax compliance that stands out for its ability to navigate complex international tax issues with creativity, precision and depth.

Contact Us Today to Schedule Your Confidential Consultation!

Substantial Presence Test United States Definition | International Tax Lawyer Minneapolis

/in , /by

Foreigners who satisfy the Substantial Presence Test constitute a an important and very large category of resident aliens for US tax purposes. Substantial Presence Test is based on the number of days that an individual is physically present in the country. The definition of “United States” varies depending on a particular Internal Revenue Code (IRC) provision.  This brief essay explores the Substantial Presence Test United States definition.

Substantial Presence Test United States Definition: Background Information

In a previous article, I explored in detail the Substantial Presence Test. I will only provide a summary of the test in this essay.

In reality, there are two substantial presence tests; if an individual meets either test, he is a US tax resident unless an exception applies.

The first substantial presence test is met if a person is physically present in the United States for at least 183 days during the calendar year. 26 USC §7701(b)(3).  

The second test (the so-called “lookback test”) is satisfied if two conditions are met: (1) the person is present in the United States for at least 31 days during the calendar year; and (2) the sum of the days on which this person was present in the country during the current and the two preceding calendar years (multiplied by the fractions found in §7701(b)(3)(A)(ii)) equals to or exceeds 183 days. 26 USC 7701(b)(3)(A).  

Let’s discuss how exactly the lookback test works.  The way to determine to determine whether the 183-day test is met is to add: (a) all days present in the United States during the current calendar year (i.e. the year for which you are trying to determine whether the Substantial Presence Test is met) + (b) one-third of the days spent in the United States in the year immediately preceding the current year + (c) one-sixth of the days spent in the United States in the second year preceding the current calendar year. See 26 USC §7701(b)(3).

Substantial Presence Test United States Definition: Definition of United States

Treas. Regs. §301.7701(b)-1(c)(2)(ii) define “United States” for the purposes of the Substantial Presence Test.  In particular, the regulations state that “United States” includes all fifty states of the United States and the District of Columbia.  Moreover, the definition of “United States” also includes: “the territorial waters of the United States and the seabed and subsoil of those submarine areas which are adjacent to the territorial waters of the United States and over which the United States has exclusive rights, in accordance with international law, with respect to the exploration and exploitation of natural resources”.  Id.

Moreover, the regulations specifically exclude all possessions and territories of the United States as well as the air space over the United States. Id.  For example, time spent in Puerto Rico will not count toward the substantial presence test. Similarly, if an alien flies over the United States on a plane and never lands, then the IRS will exclude this day from the count.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help with US International Tax Law

The Substantial Presence Test United States Definition is just one of a huge array of complications in US international tax law.  This is why you need to secure the help of Sherayzen Law Office for professional help with US international tax issues, including tax compliance, tax planning and offshore voluntary disclosures.  We have helped hundreds of taxpayers around the world.  We can help you!

Contact Us Today to Schedule Your Confidential Consultation!

Residents versus Nonresidents: US Tax Differences | International Tax Lawyer Minneapolis

/in , /by

There is a huge difference between the US tax obligations of a US tax resident versus nonresident alien. This brief essay strives to outline the main differences in the US tax treatment of tax residents versus nonresidents.

Residents versus Nonresidents: Worldwide Income Taxation

One of the key differences in the tax treatment of residents versus nonresidents is concerning what income is subject to US taxation.  A resident alien is subject to worldwide income taxation similarly to a US citizen. It does not matter where the income is earned, whether it is subject to taxation in a foreign country, whether it has been repatriated to the United States, whether it comes from pre-US funds, et cetera – a resident alien is always subject to worldwide income taxation.

Moreover, a resident alien may also be subject to highly invasive anti-deferral tax regimes such as Subpart F rules and GILTI tax (see below). Under these regimes, a resident alien may have to recognize income that the IRS deems that he earned, but there was no actual distribution.

On the other hand, a nonresident alien may have to pay US taxes on only four types of income. First, US-source income (that the Internal Revenue Code does not otherwise exclude from taxation) that the IRS considers as FDAP income (fixed, determinable, annual or periodical income) under IRC §871(a) (see below more on this subject). Second, a nonresident alien has to pay US taxes on US-source capital gains.  Third, a nonresident alien has to declare on his US income tax returns all ECI (Effectively Connected Income) income from a trade or business within the United States. Finally, certain other US-source and certain other foreign-source income under highly limited exceptions. All other income is excluded from taxation of nonresident aliens.

Residents versus Nonresidents: Deductions

On the other hand, a resident alien has available (at least hypothetically) a far broader range of deductions, including a more expanded list of itemized deductions (for example, mortgage interest, property taxes, et cetera) and a standard deduction.

A nonresident alien, however, has available a far more limited range of deductions.  First, deductions related to the ECI earnings. Second, only three specific kinds of itemized deductions: casualty/theft losses from property located in the United States, charitable contributions to qualified US charities only and one personal exemption (which is a moot point at the time of this writing). Third, a nonresident alien can only claim a standard deduction in the case of a few income tax treaties that allow the claim of a standard deduction; otherwise, the standard deduction is not available.

Residents versus Nonresidents: Tax Filing Status

If a resident alien marries another resident alien or a US citizen, then the couple may elect to file a joint US tax return. Married Filing Jointly is probably the most beneficial tax filing status in the United States.

On the other hand, nonresident aliens (if they want to keep their nonresident status) married to a resident alien or a US citizen can only file as “married filing separately”.  In most situations, this is the most unfavorable tax filing status from the US tax perspective.

Residents versus Nonresidents: US International Information Returns

Compliance with US international information returns is potentially a huge difference between the US tax burden of residents versus nonresidents. A resident alien may be required to file a bewildering array of US international information returns depending on his particular situation.  A failure to do so may result in the imposition of very high IRS penalties.

The main examples of such returns are: FBAR (officially FinCEN Form 114, the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts), Form 3520, Form 3520-A, Form 5471, Form 8621, Form 8865, Form 8938, Form 926, et cetera.

Residents versus Nonresidents: Tax Withholding on US-Source Income

There are several situations in which a payment to a non-US person may be classified as a US-source income and subject to tax withholding under IRC §§1441 and 1442 solely due to the “US resident” classification of the payor.  Here, I am referring to a situation where the US tax code classifies an interest payment as US-source income only because it is a resident alien made the payment. If such a payment were made by a nonresident alien, then it would be foreign-source income not subject to US tax withholding.

The most common example of such a situation involves interest payments.  Under §861(a)(1), interest paid by noncorporate resident of the United States is US-source income potentially subject to tax withholding. However, if the individual is a nonresident alien for US tax purposes, then the interest is not US-source income exempt from US tax withholding, at least under IRC §§1441 and 1442.

As a side note, I should mention that if the interest made by a US tax resident is classified as “portfolio interest” under §871(h), it would be exempt from the 30% tax withholding pursuant to §§871(a)(1) and 881.  There is also a potential for the exclusion from tax withholding under a particular tax treaty. As always, an international tax attorney should analyze each particular set of facts in its own context in order to determine whether income would be subject to US tax withholding.

Residents versus Nonresidents: Anti-deferral Tax Regimes

A US tax resident may be subject to a wide variety of various US anti-deferral tax regimes, such as PFIC (Passive Foreign Investment Company), GILTI, Subpart F rules, et cetera.

Moreover, a situation may occur where US resident classification as resident under the IRC does not impact this particular individual’s US income tax obligations but may affect such obligations of other US persons.  The most common example is the classification of a foreign corporation as a Controlled Foreign Corporation or CFC. 

Imagine where a person is a US tax resident under the IRC but utilizes the “tie-breaker” provisions of an income tax treaty to continue being classified as a nonresident alien. In this case, this individual’s US income tax obligations are the same as before. However, for the purposes of classifying a foreign corporation as a CFC, he remains a US tax resident. For example, if he owns 10% and the other US owners own at least 41% of this foreign corporation, then the corporation itself will become a CFC without any regard to the treaty provisions. See Reg. §301.7701(b)-7(a)(3).

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help Regarding US International Tax Law

In this article, I summarized some of the most important US tax differences between US residents versus nonresidents.  There are many more complexities and tax traps in this area of law.

This is precisely why you need to contact Sherayzen Law Office for professional help with your US tax classification and any other US international tax issue. Our firm has extensive experience in advising clients concerning their US tax status and the potential US tax consequences of a particular US tax classification.

Contact Us Today to Schedule Your Confidential Consultation!

Foreign Inheritance Tax Attorney Minneapolis | International Tax Lawyer Minnesota

/in , , /by

Receiving a foreign inheritance may open a litany of US international tax compliance obligations. Therefore, one of the first things you should do is to seek the help of an international tax attorney who specializes in foreign inheritance reporting.  If you reside in Minneapolis, Minnesota, you need to look for a Foreign Inheritance Tax Attorney Minneapolis. You will find that Sherayzen Law Office Ltd. is very likely to be the perfect fit for you.

Foreign Inheritance Tax Attorney Minneapolis: Why Foreign Inheritance is So Important to Your US international Tax Compliance

There are two main reasons why receiving a foreign inheritance may be a critical event for your US international tax compliance. First, receiving a foreign inheritance means that you have additional assets, income and transactions to report to the IRS.  The way that US international tax law works, it means that it is usually more than just one requirement is triggered. Rather, it may be a set of issues and reporting obligations that require an experienced international tax attorney to resolve them correctly. 

The multitude and complexity of issues can be fairly large: from the reporting of the foreign inheritance itself, income recognition, transfer of cash/assets to the United States to additional reporting requirements concerning newly acquired foreign assets and offshore voluntary disclosures involving prior noncompliance. You should keep in mind that noncompliance with these requirements may result in the assessment of high IRS penalties.

The second reason why a foreign inheritance is so important and so dangerous is the relative complacency with respect to and even complete nonrecognition of the potential US tax consequences of receiving a foreign inheritance with all of the multitude of issues to which I alluded above.  The problem is not just that many US taxpayers are completely ignorant of the fact that a foreign inheritance may require extensive US tax compliance. Even worse, many taxpayers erroneously but ardently believe that a foreign inheritance is something completely unrelated to the United States and should not have any US tax consequences. At best, they may focus on Form 3520 reporting while overlooking the complexity of the rest of the issues involved in receiving a foreign inheritance.

This is precisely why I highly recommend consulting an international tax lawyer with extensive experience in foreign inheritance US tax reporting, such as Sherayzen Law Office, if you have received or about to receive a foreign inheritance.

Foreign Inheritance Tax Attorney Minneapolis: International Tax Lawyer

I just mentioned that you need to seek the help of an international tax attorney rather than just a foreign inheritance tax attorney.  Why is that?

The answer is simple: a foreign inheritance attorney is first and foremost an international tax lawyer – i.e. a lawyer with profound knowledge of and extensive experience in US international tax law, particularly in the area of US international tax compliance. This means that a lawyer must be familiar with such common US international tax forms as Form 3520 (critically important for foreign inheritance reporting) and Form 8938.  He must also understand and be able to identify related US international tax compliance forms such as Forms 3520-A, 5471, 8858, 8865 cetera.  Of course, every US international tax lawyer must be very familiar with FinCEN Form 114 commonly known as FBAR.

In addition to these information returns, an international tax lawyer must be familiar with all types of foreign income reporting.  This requirement includes the knowledge of foreign rental income, PFIC compliance, GILTI income, capital gains concerning foreign real estate, et cetera.

Sherayzen Law Office is a highly experienced international tax law firm with respect to all of these income tax and information return requirements, including specifically all of the aforementioned forms.

Foreign Inheritance Tax Attorney Minneapolis: Tax Planning

It is highly prudent to engage in tax planning concerning a foreign inheritance. This is important not only for the purpose of limiting future tax burdens, but also to control future US tax compliance costs.  

Sherayzen Law Office has extensive experience in foreign inheritance US tax planning for its clients in Minneapolis and all over the world.  We also have a highly valuable experience of combining income tax planning with offshore voluntary disclosures.

Foreign Inheritance Tax Attorney Minneapolis: Offshore Voluntary Disclosures

Perhaps you learned late about your US international tax compliance requirements concerning foreign inheritance. In fact, this is a very common situation. In this case, you will find yourself in a very uncomfortable position of facing potentially multiple high IRS penalties for multiple violations of US international tax law.

For this reason, your foreign inheritance tax attorney must also have a profound understanding of the IRS voluntary disclosure options. In fact, in my experience, a discussion of a foreign inheritance often leads to the identification of past US international tax noncompliance and the immediate discussion of IRS offshore voluntary disclosure to remedy past noncompliance.

Offshore Voluntary Disclosures is a core area of our international tax practice at Sherayzen Law Office. We have helped hundreds of US taxpayers worldwide, including in Minneapolis, to bring their tax affairs into full compliance with US tax laws. This work included the preparation and filing of all kinds of offshore voluntary disclosures including: SDOP (Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures), SFOP (Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures), DFSP (Delinquent FBAR Submission Procedures), DIIRSP (Delinquent International Information Return Submission Procedures), et cetera.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Foreign Inheritance Tax Help

Sherayzen Law Office is an international tax law firm that specializes in US international tax compliance, including foreign inheritance reporting.  We have helped numerous clients around the world with their foreign inheritance US tax compliance. We can help you! Hence, if you are looking for a Foreign Inheritance Tax Attorney Minneapolis, contact us now to schedule Your Confidential Consultation!

Digital Currency Final Regulations: Broad Overview | Cryptocurrency Tax Attorney

/in , /by

On June 28, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have issued final regulations requiring brokers to report sales and exchanges of digital assets, including cryptocurrency. These digital currency final regulations aim to improve tax compliance and provide taxpayers with necessary information for accurate tax reporting.

Digital Currency Final Regulations: Scope and Implementation

The new regulations will apply to transactions beginning in calendar year 2025, with reports to be filed on the new Form 1099-DA. These rules primarily affect custodial brokers who take possession of digital assets being sold by their customers, including:

  • Operators of custodial digital asset trading platforms
  • Certain digital asset hosted wallet providers
  • Digital asset kiosks
  • Certain processors of digital asset payments (PDAPs)

Notably, the regulations do not currently include reporting requirements for non-custodial or decentralized brokers. The Treasury and IRS plan to address these entities in a separate set of regulations in the future.

Digital Currency Final Regulations: Key Provisions

There are six key areas addressed in the final regulations:

  1. Basis, Gain, and Loss Determination: The regulations provide rules for taxpayers to determine their basis, gain, and loss from digital asset transactions. This is very important, because we will now have a more or less clear set of rules to follow.
  2. Backup Withholding: New rules for backup withholding on certain digital asset transactions are included. This is a critical issue, especially in the context of US international tax law.
  3. Real Estate Transactions: Real estate professionals must report the fair market value of digital assets used in real estate transactions with closing dates on or after January 1, 2026. Another key provision aimed to improve tax compliance in this area.
  4. Aggregate Reporting: An optional aggregate reporting method is provided for certain sales of stablecoins and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that exceed specified thresholds.
  5. PDAP Transactions: Reporting is required on a transactional basis only if customer sales exceed a de minimis threshold.
  6. Basis Reporting: Certain brokers must report basis for transactions occurring on or after January 1, 2026. This is a very good provision for US taxpayers, because cost-basis determination is often very cumbersome when it comes to digital asset gain reporting.

Digital Currency Final Regulations: Transitional Relief and Exceptions

Obviously, the new reporting requirements is an increased compliance burden on affected custodial brokers. In order to ease this burden, the IRS is providing the following transitional and penalty relief:

  1. Notice 2024-56 offers general transitional relief from reporting penalties and backup withholding for brokers making good faith efforts to comply during calendar year 2025.
    Limited relief from backup withholding is provided for certain digital asset sales in 2026 for brokers using the IRS TIN-matching system.
  2. Notice 2024-57 temporarily exempts six types of transactions from reporting requirements, including wrapping and unwrapping transactions, liquidity provider transactions and staking transactions, among others.
  3. Revenue Procedure 2024-28 allows taxpayers to use reasonable allocation methods for unused basis across wallets or accounts holding the same digital asset.

Digital Currency Final Regulations: IRS Rationale

IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel emphasized the importance of these regulations in addressing potential noncompliance in digital currency transactions. The new reporting requirements are expected to improve detection of noncompliance and provide taxpayers with information to simplify their reporting process.

Werfel also highlighted the need for adequate IRS funding to keep pace with the evolving complexity of the tax system, particularly in relation to new digital assets.

Digital Currency Final Regulations: Impact

These Digital Currency Final Regulations represent a major development in the taxation and reporting of digital asset transactions, in particular with respect to integration of digital assets into the existing tax framework. As the digital asset landscape continues to evolve, further refinements and additional regulations are likely to follow, particularly regarding non-custodial and decentralized brokers. While the regulations provide clarity for many custodial brokers and taxpayers, the full impact of these regulations will become clearer as implementation begins in 2025 and beyond.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Tax Help With US International Tax Aspects of Digital Currencies

Given the complex and evolving nature of digital currency regulations, it is crucial to seek expert guidance. Sherayzen Law Office specializes in US international tax law and can provide invaluable assistance in navigating the intricate landscape of digital currency taxation across borders. Contact us today to schedule your confidential consultation!