Posts

Legal Threats to Wealth | Asset Protection Lawyer Minneapolis

Legal threats to wealth do not apply only to the wealthiest top 1% of US taxpayers. Rather, they also should concern middle and upper-middle classes of the United States, especially doctors, lawyers, small and mid-size business owners, professionals (self-employed and employed within by companies), high-salaried employees, corporate officers, high-net-worth families and investors.

In this article, I would like to discuss the common legal threats to wealth, whether it was earned or inherited. For the purposes of this writing, “legal threats” mean the threats stemming from various litigation theories, divorce and death.

1. Legal Threats to Wealth: Contract Claims

One of the most common threat to wealth comes from contract litigation. In these cases, a plaintiff would usually assert that the defendant failed to perform under a contract and ask for compensatory, punitive, statutory and/or exemplary damages. In addition to failure to perform under a contract, claims may be asserted with respect to debts, guarantees, contingent liabilities and joint and several partnership obligations.

The contract claim risks can be very hard to anticipate because of the surprising reach of the contract exposure (for example, a judge may interpret a guaranty far beyond its intended scope or grant huge damages to a defendant).

2. Legal Threats to Wealth: Extension of Corporate Liability to Officers and Directors

One of the most dangerous legal threats to wealth is in the trend to hold corporate Officers and Directors liable for the actions or inactions of their employer-corporation. These threats can come from the government and from the private sector.

3. Legal Threats to Wealth: Tort Litigation

The incessant growth in tort litigation is a primary concern for anyone involved in a medical profession, but it also should worry individuals in other fields. It is generally agreed that the United States is the most litigious society in the world and the risk of being sued should always be taken into account.

One of the new legal threats to wealth comes from interspousal tort liability claims – i.e. intentional infliction of emotional distress by one spouse on another. In some cases, these claims can even successfully circumvent premarital agreements.

4. Legal Threats to Wealth: Partnership Obligations

I already alluded to this threat in my discussion of joint and several liability for partners in a partnership. Here, we can also add the appearance of new partners without consent through litigation.

5. Legal Threats to Wealth: Environmental and Other Regulatory Liability

A newer set of threats to wealth comes from various US regulations, particularly the US environmental regulations (such as Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act or “CERCLA”) which makes individuals liable for environmental hazards on the land that they own irrespective of whether the present owners created the hazard or bought the land knowing that there was one. The liability can also be shared by former landowners and even officers and directors of a corporate owner (as long as they had “substantial control” over the land).

6. Legal Threats to Wealth: Divorce

The concerns over the division of property during a divorce have grown into one of the most serious threats to wealth. The threat is so critical that it has become a factor in many peoples’ preference for choosing co-living rather than a marriage.

The reason why this problem has become so serious is that, in most US tax jurisdictions, the understandable desire to protect a non-working spouse has grown to the almost automatic fifty-fifty division of property no matter how such property was brought into the marriage and how inequitable such division could be. Moreover, the attempts by lawyers to mitigate this problem though premarital and marital arrangements are often completely overturned by the judges, even in situations where such arrangements seek to protect the children’s inheritance.

7. Legal Threats to Wealth: Compulsory Dispositions

The last common legal threat to wealth that I wish to mention in this article is a forced disposition, usually upon termination of marriage or death. In a civil law system, this threat is usually materialized in the form of “forced heirs”. Dower and curtesy rights exemplify the threat of a compulsory disposition in common law jurisdictions.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Tax, Asset Protection and Estate Planning Help with Respect to Your US and Foreign Assets

If you are concerned about protecting your assets in the United States and overseas, contact Sherayzen Law Office for professional help. Our legal team will thoroughly analyze your assets and create an asset protection plan incorporating the necessary tax and estate planning features.

Form 8960 and the Net Investment Income Tax

The new Net Investment Income Tax imposed by Internal Revenue Code Section 1411 went into effect on January 1, 2013 for income tax returns of individuals, estates and trusts, beginning with their first taxable year starting on (or after) January 1, 2013. The Net Investment Income Tax applies at a rate of 3.8% on certain net investment income of individuals, estates and trusts that have income above statutory threshold limits.

Form 8960 is used by individuals, estates, and trusts to compute their Net Investment Income Tax. The IRS has posted a draft version of the instructions to Form 8960, and recently, it released the final version of the form itself.

This article will explain the basics of Form 8960 and the Net Investment Income Tax. Future articles on this topic will also provide more information about this tax. The article is not intended to convey tax or legal advice. Please consult a tax attorney if you have further questions. Sherayzen Law Office, Ltd. can assist you in all of your tax and legal needs.

The Net Investment Income Tax

As mentioned above, the Net Investment Income Tax applies at a 3.8 percent to certain net investment income of individuals, estates and trusts that have income above statutory threshold limits. If individuals have Net Investment Income, they will owe the Net Investment Income Tax if they have modified adjusted gross income, for purposes of the Net Investment Income Tax (note that individuals with income from controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) and passive foreign investment companies (PFICs) may have additional adjustments to their AGI) above the following thresholds: for married filing jointly returns, the threshold is $250,000; for married filing separately returns, the threshold amount is $125,000; for single taxpayers or Head of household (with qualifying person), the threshold is $200,000; for a qualifying widow or widower with a dependent child, the threshold is $250,000.

Note also that these threshold amounts are not indexed for inflation.

According to the IRS, “In general, investment income includes, but is not limited to: interest, dividends, capital gains, rental and royalty income, non-qualified annuities, income from businesses involved in trading of financial instruments or commodities and businesses that are passive activities to the taxpayer (within the meaning of section 469). To calculate your Net Investment Income, your investment income is reduced by certain expenses properly allocable to the income.” Certain common income items, such as tax-exempt interest, Alaska Permanent Fund Dividends, and distributions from certain Qualified Plans (those described in sections 401(a), 403(a), 403(b), 408, 408A or 457(b)), are not treated as Net Investment Income.

US Persons and Nonresident Aliens

Dual-status individuals, who are US residents for a part of the year and Nonresident Aliens (NRAs) for the other part of the year, are subject to the Net Investment Income Tax only with respect to the portion of the year during which they are US residents. The threshold amounts described above, however, are not reduced or prorated for dual-status residents.

Dual-resident individuals, (see regulation §301.7701(b)-7(a)(1) for more information) who determine that they are residents of foreign countries for tax purposes pursuant to US-foreign country income tax treaties, and who claim benefits of such treaties as nonresidents of the US, are deemed to be NRAs for Net Investment Income Tax purposes.

NRAs are not subject to the Net Investment Income Tax. For married couples in which one spouse is an NRA, and the other is a U.S. citizen or resident, and the NRA has made, or is planning to make, an election to be treated as a resident alien for purposes of filing a married filing jointly return, IRS final regulations provide these couples with special rules and a respective Net Investment Income Tax IRC Section 6013(g) or (h) election.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Tax Planning Advice

In previous articles, we covered some of the new tax changes and deduction phase-outs for 2013 tax returns to be filed in 2014 that could trigger a much higher tax liability for many taxpayers. The Net Investment Income Tax will only add to the tax liabilities many high net-worth taxpayers will face. Professional tax planning may be very important in order to help you lower your future tax liabilities. The experienced tax law firm of Sherayzen Law Office, Ltd. can assist with this goal.

What is Closing Agreement

Closing agreements constitute an important part of tax representation and tax planning. A “closing agreement” is a final agreement between the IRS and the taxpayer on a specific issue or liability. Closing agreements are entered into pursuant to IRC Section 7121.

Usually, closing agreements may be entered into when it is beneficial to permanently and conclusively close a pending matter. However, a taxpayer may use other good reasons for this type of an agreement to convince the IRS. In both cases, however, it should be demonstrated that the agreement will not prejudice the government’s interests.

If a transaction is eligible for a letter ruling, the taxpayer may request a closing agreement with or in lieu of a letter ruling. Sometimes, it is the IRS that may impose closing agreement as a condition for the issuance of a letter ruling.

Sherayzen Law Office offers full IRS representation, including handling your case through a private letter ruling request and entering into a closing agreement, where appropriate.

If you have a case pending before the IRS or you are unsure about the tax consequences of a business transaction, call NOW to discuss your case with an experienced Minneapolis tax lawyer!

Higher Education Tax Credits

This is an education tax credit update from a Minneapolis tax lawyer.  American Opportunity Tax Credit and the Lifetime Learning Tax Credit are two federal tax credits designed to help eligible taxpayers offset their higher education expenses.

To qualify for either credit, a taxpayer must pay postsecondary tuition and fees for himself, spouse or dependent. The credit may be claimed by the parent or the student, but not by both. If the student was claimed as a dependent, the student cannot file for the credit.

Only one of the credits is available in a single tax year per each student. This means that, in a given tax year, a taxpayer cannot claim both credits for the same student’s college expenses. If a taxpayer pays college expenses for two or more students in the same year, then he can choose to take credits on a per-student, per-year basis. For example, the taxpayer can claim the American Opportunity Credit for a sophomore daughter and the Lifetime Learning Credit for a senior son.

Let’s look closer at some of the key facts about American Opportunity Tax Credit and Lifetime Learning Tax Credit.

The American Opportunity Credit

The credit is available for students enrolled in a post-secondary education program in pursuit of an undergraduate degree or other recognized educational credential, but only for the first four years. The student must be enrolled at least half time for at least one academic period. Qualified expenses include tuition and fees, coursed related books supplies and equipment.

The credit can be up to $2,500 per eligible student. The full credit is generally available to eligible taxpayers who make less than $80,000 or $160,000 for married couples filing a joint return. Moreover the credit is refundable; this means that a taxpayer may be able to receive up to $1,000 in refund even if he owes no taxes.

Lifetime Learning Credit

Unlike the American Opportunity Credit, the Lifetime Learning Tax Credit is available for all years of postsecondary education and for courses to acquire or improve job skills. This also means that the student does not need to be studying in pursuit of a degree or other recognized education credential. Qualified expenses include tuition and fees, course related books, supplies and equipment.

The credit can be up to $2,000 per eligible student. The full credit is generally available to eligible taxpayers who make less than $60,000 or $120,000 for married couples filing a joint return. This tax credit, however, is not refundable and is limited to the amount of tax a taxpayer must pay on his return.

If you have questions with respect to any tax credits, contract us NOW to discuss your case with an experienced Minneapolis tax attorney.

Business Tax Returns: The Advantages of a Tax Attorney Review

A lot of businesses simply look at the tax returns as “adding numbers.” Yet, tax returns are so much more than that. A tax return is a result of a long series of decisions made by the business, such as elections, classifications, investment strategies, structuring of business transactions, and numerous other actions and inactions. Dealing with this interior constitution of a business tax return from a legal perspective (rather than from a more rudimentary accounting view) is the superior advantage of a business tax attorney.

The advantages of the legal approach to tax returns can be grouped in three classifications. First, an attorney will review a business tax return from a structural perspective, taking into account the temporal element of a business transactions (i.e. comparing the effect of a business strategy throughout different time periods – prior years and future projections) and non-tax business and legal goals. This structural overview is especially effective in advantageous positioning of a tax strategy into the overall legal structure of a business.

This first approach necessarily leads to the second advantage – a business tax attorney will explore an alternative treatment of a given business and/or tax issue and will strive to find a legal solution to a taxation matter. Armed with a deeper understanding of other legal and non-legal goals of a business client, a tax attorney may engage in re-classification of certain business transactions to take better advantage of the contemporary provision of the Internal Revenue Code. In certain situations, an attorney review may even result in filing amended tax returns for prior tax years in an attempt to recapture tax benefits (i.e. receive tax refunds), which were unavailable or overlooked in the past.

Finally, an overview of a business tax return by a business tax lawyer is likely to lead to comprehensive tax planning for the future. In some situations, an overview of a business tax return by a business tax lawyer will result in a recommendation of a complete re-structuring of business transactions in a more tax-advantageous matter while seeking to achieve the same business goals. In others, a business tax lawyer may implement tax deferment and tax reduction strategies centered around purely legal and tax concepts.

Whether your business is small or large, growing or maturing, local or international, retaining the services of a business tax lawyer to overview your business tax return should become your annual practice. The benefits of such overview are usually substantial. In addition to the direct advantages of a better current tax strategy and future tax planning, an overview of a business tax return by an attorney may lead to completely unexpected and important discoveries about the legal and tax situation of your business – the legal issues that were overlooked in the past, but could have grown into severe problems in the future had it not been for their timely discovery.

Sherayzen Law Office can help you review your business tax returns and create responsible and tax effective strategies for the current and future tax years. Call NOW to discuss your business tax return(s) with an international business tax lawyer!