taxation law services

FATCA, Form 8938 and TD F 90-22.1 Disclosure: Making Informed Decisions

/in , /by

The past decade brought on a wave of new international tax legislation as well as unprecedented enforcement of older tax laws. From FinCEN Form 114 (formerly Form TD F 90-22.1) (commonly known as “FBAR”) to new FATCA legislation that led to the creation of Form 8938, the current US tax regime with respect to international obligations of US persons has become so complex that it is almost impossible to navigate it for most taxpayers without the professional help of international tax lawyers.

Increasing Complexity of US Tax Laws Requires International Tax Attorney Involvement

With increased complexity of the international tax landscape, the chance of running afoul some US tax rule has become very, very high. Since international tax laws are usually associated with high non-compliance penalties, the taxpayers need to make an informed decision on how to deal with their prior tax non-compliance.

Nowhere is the urgency and necessity of making informed decisions is so high as when it comes to FBARs and Form 8938, primarily because of draconian penalties associated with failure to file these forms Form 114 (formerly TD F 90-22.1). The ability to analyze the fact pattern, spot all the issues and identify available options based on experience are crucial in this esoteric area of law and the international tax attorneys experienced in voluntary disclosures should be handling such cases.

Choosing the Right Attorney is a Challenge

Unfortunately, it is precisely in this area that there is a serious obstacle to getting the necessary information to make an informed decision. The obstacle is that there is a tremendously small number of international tax attorneys who practice in this area of law and these professionals are shielded by a mass of inexperienced and unqualified attorneys and especially accountants.

It is virtually impossible for taxpayers to state with certainty who is the right lawyer for their case. A lot of taxpayers immediately fall into the trap of going to their accountants to do a voluntary disclosure. In a prior article, I already explained why this could be present a huge problem for the taxpayers.

Other taxpayers correctly realized that they need a tax attorney to get help with their voluntary disclosure. However, some of these taxpayers often make a mistake of hiring a tax lawyer who is not practicing international tax law.

Some taxpayers fall into the “local” trap where they choose an attorney because he or she is in their state or town, not because the attorney is an international tax attorney or experienced in the area of voluntary disclosures.

You Should Choose an International Tax Lawyer Experienced in Form 8938 (FATCA) and FBAR Voluntary Disclosure

In order to make an informed decision, the taxpayers who have undisclosed foreign assets should contact an international tax attorney who is experienced in the are of voluntary disclosures.

Sherayzen Law Office is an international tax law firm that is highly experienced in the area of voluntary disclosures involving FBARs and Forms 8938. Owner Eugene Sherayzen is an experienced international tax attorney who will thoroughly analyze your case, identify all relevant issues, provide accurate estimates of your FBAR and Form 8938 liability, and propose creative legal voluntary disclosure options.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for help with FBARs and Form 8938.

Reducing Your FBAR Penalties

/in , /by

FBAR (FinCEN Form 114 formerly Form TD F 90-22.1) penalties can be absolutely draconian. However, with a help of an experienced international tax attorney, they do not have to be so brutal.

Unfortunately, the IRS, accountants and even many lawyers present an overly simplistic view of the FBAR penalty structure. They start out with the potential criminal penalties and absolutely outrageous willful penalties and they usually end there by arguing that a non-compliant taxpayer should enter into the OVDP program (now closed).

What many tax professionals do not discuss is the immense complexity of the FBAR penalty structure that offers various chances to reduce and, sometimes, even eliminate your FBAR penalties through establishing non-willfulness and various mitigation guidelines.

This is a discussion that a tax professional must have with his client; otherwise, the client will not get the full picture of his case and cannot make an informed decision with respect to his voluntary disclosure options.

Notice that the potential for reduction of the FBAR penalties that exists under the current law is not the same as chimerical schemes that abound the internet. On the contrary, this is a serious discussion of what your potential FBAR penalties may be and what is the likelihood of success.

In some case, mitigation of penalties is a real possibility while, in others, entering the OVDP program may constitute a better choice. The important argument at the core of this essay is that the taxpayer should know about all of the options before the decision to the OVDP is made – i.e. the taxpayer has a chance to make a fully-informed decision, not a fear-driven one.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office to Discuss the FBAR Penalty Structure and Possibilities for Reducing Your FBAR Penalties

If you have undisclosed foreign assets, contact Sherayzen Law Office for legal help with your voluntary disclosure. Our experienced tax law firm will thoroughly review your case, estimate your FBAR penalties, analyze the potential for reduction of these penalties vis-a-vis entrance into the OVDP and present to you the available voluntary disclosure options so that you can make an informed decision.

Making a Section 444 Election

/in , /by

The IRS has established various rules regarding required tax years in order to prevent excess deferral of taxes by partnerships, S corporations, and personal service corporations. In certain circumstances, however, under Internal Revenue Code Section 444, partnerships, S corporations, and personal service corporations may elect to use a tax year other than their required tax year, subject to certain limitations. This article will explain the basics of Section 444 elections. It is not intended to constitute tax or legal advice.

Partnership, S Corporation and personal service corporation taxation can involve many complex tax and legal issues, so it may be advisable to seek an experienced attorney in these matters. Sherayzen Law Office, PLLC can assist you in all of your tax and legal needs.

Requirements

In general, a partnership, S corporation, or personal service corporation can make a section 444 election provided that it meets the following requirements: (1) it is not a member of a “tiered structure” (defined below), (2) it has not previously made a section 444 election, and (3) it elects a tax year that meets IRS deferral period requirements.

A tiered structure is defined in 26 C.F.R. § 1.444-2T: “—(1) In general. A partnership, S corporation, or personal service corporation is considered a member of a tiered structure if— (i) The partnership, S corporation, or personal service corporation directly owns any portion of a deferral entity, or (ii) A deferral entity directly owns any portion of the partnership, S corporation, or personal service corporation.”

Determination of the Deferral Period

The deferral period is determined by whether a partnership, S corporation, or personal service corporation is adopting or changing its tax year by making a section 444 election, or whether it is retaining its tax year.

For partnerships, S corporations, or personal service corporations adopting or changing to a tax year other than its required year, the deferral period is the number of months after the end of the new elected tax year to the end of the required tax year.

If a partnership, S corporation, or personal service corporation makes a Section 444 election to retain its tax year, the deferral period must be three months or less, determined by the number of months from the start of the tax year to be retained and the end of the first required tax year.

Making a Section 444 Election

Form 8716 must be filed in order to make a Section 444 election. In general, the form must be filed by the earlier of the due date (not including extensions) of the elected tax year or the 15th day of the 6th month of the tax year for which the Section 444 election will go into effect. Form 8716 should be attached to Form 1065, Form 1120S, or Form 1120 for the first elected tax year. A Section 444 election will remain in effect until terminated.Required Payments

A partnership or an S corporation making a Section 444 election must also file Form 8752, “Required Payment or Refund Under Section 7519” for every year that the election is in effect. If the required payment is greater than $500, the payment must be made when the form is filed. A personal service corporation must distribute required amounts to its employee-owners by December 31st of each elected Section 444 tax year.

Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Help with Section 444 election.

 

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are hereby advised that any written tax advice contained in this answer was not written or intended to be used (and cannot be used) by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.

IRS Auto Depreciation Limits Released for 2013

/in , /by

The IRS recently released Rev. Proc. 2013-21 detailing the updated price inflation adjustment limitations on depreciation deductions and lease inclusion amounts for passenger automobiles first placed in service during calendar year 2013. These adjustments are required under Internal Revenue Code Section 280F. If you need advice relating to these matters, or any other tax or legal issues, please contact Sherayzen Law Office, PLLC.

Relevant Definitions

According to the IRS, “Passenger automobiles are defined in section 280F(d)(5)(A) as any 4-wheeled vehicle which is manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, and which is rated at 6,000 pounds unloaded gross vehicle weight (or, in the case of a truck or van, 6,000 pounds gross vehicle weight) or less. Section 280F(d)(5)(B) provides exceptions from this definition, and allows the Secretary to promulgate regulations to exclude trucks and vans from the definition of passenger automobiles” (Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2003-37).

Limits for Passenger Automobiles (Excluding Trucks and Vans)

The depreciation limitations for passenger automobiles (not including trucks or vans) first placed in service during calendar year 2013, and for which the additional bonus depreciation applies (allowing for 50% “expensing” of the cost of the automobile in the year of purchase), is $11,160 for the first tax year. The amounts for following years are: $5,100 the second tax year, $3,050 for the third year, and $1,875 for each succeeding year. Note that, for this category and for each category that follows below, any personal use of a passenger automobile, truck or van will reduce the maximum depreciation deduction that may be taken by a business.

As will be seen from the deduction amounts listed below, only the first year of depreciation is affected by the adjustments.

For passenger automobiles (excluding trucks and vans) placed in service during calendar year 2013 to which 50% bonus depreciation does not apply, the depreciation is $3,160 for the first tax year. For the following years, the amounts are: $5,100 the second tax year, $3,050 for the third year, and $1,875 for each succeeding year.

Limits for Trucks and Vans

The depreciation limitations for trucks and vans first placed in service during calendar year 2013, and to which the additional 50% bonus depreciation applies, is slightly higher than passenger automobiles, at $11,360 for the first tax year. For later years, the amounts are: $5,400 the second tax year, $3,250 for the third year, and $1,975 for each succeeding year.

The depreciation limitations for trucks and vans first placed in service during calendar year 2013, and to which the additional 50% bonus depreciation does not apply, is $3,360 for the first tax year. For later years, the amounts are: $5,400 the second tax year, $3,250 for the third year, and $1,975 for each succeeding year.

Bonus Depreciation

Rev. Proc. 2013-21 includes various factors as to why bonus depreciation may not apply, including the fact that a taxpayer, “(1) purchased the passenger automobile used; (2) did not use the passenger automobile during 2013 more than 50 percent for business purposes; (3) elected out of the § 168(k) additional first year depreciation deduction pursuant to § 168(k)(2)(D)(iii); or (4) elected to increase the § 53 AMT credit limitation in lieu of claiming § 168(k) additional first year depreciation.” If a passenger automobile, truck or van is not used at least 50% of the time for business purposes, the vehicle must be depreciated under standard straight-line ADS rules.
The Rev. Proc. also includes updated tables for the dollar amount of income inclusion for passenger automobiles (excluding trucks and vans), and separate tables for trucks and vans with a lease terms beginning calendar year 2013.